stunnel-users September 2005

stunnel-users@stunnel.org

18 participants
21 discussions

Re: stunnel-users Digest, Vol 14, Issue 7
by mxrtmxd72＠att.net 22 Sep '05

22 Sep '05

Thanks Michael. -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: stunnel-users-request(a)mirt.net > Send stunnel-users mailing list submissions to > stunnel-users(a)mirt.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > stunnel-users-request(a)mirt.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > stunnel-users-owner(a)mirt.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of stunnel-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Help Installing Stunnel After Reformat Drive (mxrtmxd72(a)att.net) > 2. Re: Help Installing Stunnel After Reformat Drive (Michal Trojnara) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:21:03 +0000 > From: mxrtmxd72(a)att.net > Subject: [stunnel-users] Help Installing Stunnel After Reformat Drive > To: stunnel-users(a)mirt.net (stunnel-users) > Message-ID: > > <092120052021.21511.4331C0AE000BE230000054072160376316CDC90B98039B9D9803(a)att.net > > > > > I have been using Stunnel with Agent versioin 3. My system recently crashed and > I had to re-format the hard drive, reinstall Windows XP, and reinstall my apps. > I have followed the directions at wurd.com/cl_ssl_stunnel.php#Windows. > Fortunately, I had backups of the required files. > > I placed libeay32.dll, libssl32.dll, stunnel-4.10.exe, and stunnel.conf in > C:\Stunnel. > > I placed a shortcut on the desktop which points to C:\Batch\runagent.bat. > > C:\Batch\runagent.bat consists of the following line: > c:\batch\runagent.cmd > > c:\batch\runagent.cmd consists of the following lines: > net start stunnel > "C:\Program Files\Agent\agent.exe" > net stop stunnel > > There is also a desktop shortcut which points to C:\Stunnel\stunnel-4.10.exe. > > When I place a pause command following the net start stunnel line in > runagent.cmd a message appears: The service name is invalid. > > The WURD document seems to imply that it is not necessary to run stunnel-410.exe > -install unless you want Stunnel to run all the time. Am I missing something? > I don't remember exactly how I made this work when I first installed it before > my system crashed. > > Any assistance would be gratefully appreciated. Thanks. > > Mort Middleman > > > > > > > Print. > Move to folder: > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:05:51 +0200 > From: "Michal Trojnara" <Michal.Trojnara(a)mobi-com.net> > Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] Help Installing Stunnel After Reformat > Drive > To: "stunnel-users" <stunnel-users(a)mirt.net> > Message-ID: <001401c5bf4c$823b6f00$df66a8c0@DT1518000186> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-2"; > reply-type=original > > Mort Middleman <mxrtmxd72(a)att.net> wrote: > > net start stunnel > [cut] > > The WURD document seems to imply that it is not necessary to run > > stunnel-410.exe > > -install unless you want Stunnel to run all the time. Am I missing > > something? > > Yes. You need to install a service in order to start it. 8-) > You can change Startup Type in your Control Panel/Services so stunnel > service is not started automatically. > > BTW: Stunnel 4.12 is going to be released with a Windows installer, so users > won't have to maually copy the dlls. 8-) > You could try a prerelease here: > ftp://ftp.mirt.net/stunnel/stunnel-4.12rc1-installer.exe > > Best regards, > Mike > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > stunnel-users mailing list > stunnel-users(a)mirt.net > http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users > > > End of stunnel-users Digest, Vol 14, Issue 7 > ********************************************

1 0

Help Installing Stunnel After Reformat Drive
by mxrtmxd72＠att.net 22 Sep '05

22 Sep '05

I have been using Stunnel with Agent versioin 3. My system recently crashed and I had to re-format the hard drive, reinstall Windows XP, and reinstall my apps. I have followed the directions at wurd.com/cl_ssl_stunnel.php#Windows. Fortunately, I had backups of the required files. I placed libeay32.dll, libssl32.dll, stunnel-4.10.exe, and stunnel.conf in C:\Stunnel. I placed a shortcut on the desktop which points to C:\Batch\runagent.bat. C:\Batch\runagent.bat consists of the following line: c:\batch\runagent.cmd c:\batch\runagent.cmd consists of the following lines: net start stunnel "C:\Program Files\Agent\agent.exe" net stop stunnel There is also a desktop shortcut which points to C:\Stunnel\stunnel-4.10.exe. When I place a pause command following the net start stunnel line in runagent.cmd a message appears: The service name is invalid. The WURD document seems to imply that it is not necessary to run stunnel-410.exe -install unless you want Stunnel to run all the time. Am I missing something? I don't remember exactly how I made this work when I first installed it before my system crashed. Any assistance would be gratefully appreciated. Thanks. Mort Middleman Print. Move to folder:

2 1

RE: [stunnel-users] Access to a daemon that has SSL abilities
by Amiram Oren 15 Sep '05

15 Sep '05

10x for the quick reply Alaric! Just want to see if I fully understand your note.. You set the stunnel daemon (/application) on a certain client machine. (let's say you have an IMAP client on it) Then, you configure your Argosoft server, which is set on another machine, to listen to SSL communication (i.e. IMAPS). Is this correct? Cheers, Oren. -----Original Message----- From: Alaric Dailey [mailto:alaricd@pengdows.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 7:44 PM To: Amiram Oren; stunnel-users(a)mirt.net Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] Access to a daemon that has SSL abilities Amiram Oren wrote: > Hi. > > Can I use stunnel only on a client side, in case on the other side, > the server already supports SSL? > > Will this work for SPOP3 and SMTP\S? > > 10X! > > Oren Amiram > >ilman/listinfo/stunnel-users > > I use it on my Argosoft email server to support IMAP, pop3 and HTTP with SSL onWindows 2003 yet :) - ______________________________________________________________________ This email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-Secure and has been found clean.

2 1

Failed to initialize remote connection
by stunnel-users＠tinfoil.cotse.net 15 Sep '05

15 Sep '05

Hello I am running the Win32 binaries, v4.11, and up to now, they were working fine, as had all the 4.x versions before. But now my http connection will not work; it says "Failed to initialize remote connection". 2005.09.14 22:50:04 LOG3[2500:1492]: Failed to initialize remote connection 2005.09.14 22:50:06 LOG3[2500:1608]: Failed to initialize remote connection Please can anyone advice me what is wrong and how to put this right? Thanks.

1 0

Re: stunnel-4.11 stable?
by Serge Marigold 14 Sep '05

14 Sep '05

FYI, I'm trying to make a case so that my employer will feel some degree of comfort if we deploy it. Is there any other commercial entity that uses this version (4.11) of stunnel. Thanks

1 0

stunnel-4.11 patch for multiple certificates
by Nick Tolomiczenko 14 Sep '05

14 Sep '05

Hi stunnel users, I placed a patch to stunnel-4.11 that will enable it to handle multiple certificates. It is currently awaiting moderator approval. For those who can't wait, please contact myself, Nick Tolomiczenko, or Shem Ali below. Here's the description of what it does: This patch addresses the need for service-level ssl contexts. In particular, the following options which were only available as global options may now be used at the service level: cert, key, CApath, CAfile, ciphers, CRLpath, CRLfile, options, client and verify. If any of these options are used in a service section, stunnel will override its global setting -- if it exists -- and initialize a separate ssl context for the service. On the other hand, for those services that do not specify any of these options, stunnel will fall back on what was specified in the global section of the configuration file and intialize a "common" ssl context for those services. Note: If all services each specified at least one the the above ssl options, then the no "common" ssl context will be initialized since each service will have its own. In this case, it's still a good idea to put common default ssl options in the global section as each service will inherit these settings even if the service initializes its own ssl context. Brought to you by: Nick Tolomiczenko: nick(a)renderquest.com or nick(a)neikos.com Shem Ali: shem(a)renderquest.com

1 0

stunnel-4.11 patch for multiple certificates
by Nick Tolomiczenko 14 Sep '05

14 Sep '05

This patch addresses the need for service-level ssl contexts. In particular, the following options which were only available as global options may now be used at the service level: cert, key, CApath, CAfile, ciphers, CRLpath, CRLfile, options, client and verify. If any of these options are used in a service section, stunnel will override its global setting -- if it exists -- and initialize a separate ssl context for the service. On the other hand, for those services that do not specify any of these options, stunnel will fall back on what was specified in the global section of the configuration file and intialize a "common" ssl context for those services. Note: If all services each specified at least one the the above ssl options, then the no "common" ssl context will be initialized since each service will have its own. In this case, it's still a good idea to put common default ssl options in the global section as each service will inherit these settings even if the service initializes its own ssl context. Brought to you by: Nick Tolomiczenko: nick(a)renderquest.com or nick(a)neikos.com Shem Ali: shem(a)renderquest.com

1 0

Access to a daemon that has SSL abilities
by Amiram Oren 14 Sep '05

14 Sep '05

Hi. Can I use stunnel only on a client side, in case on the other side, the server already supports SSL? Will this work for SPOP3 and SMTP\S? 10X! Oren Amiram

2 1

stunnel-4.11 stable?
by Serge Marigold 13 Sep '05

13 Sep '05

Hi, Is anyone using stunnel-4.11 in a heavily trafficed production environment?

1 0

4.10 stable?
by conover＠rahul.net 09 Sep '05

09 Sep '05

Stunnel 4.10 has gzip compression, right? Is it stable? Thanks, John -- John Conover, conover(a)rahul.net, http://www.johncon.com/

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

stunnel-users September 2005