stunnel-users January 2015

stunnel-users@stunnel.org

16 participants
15 discussions

Stunnel 4 failing to connect to gmail
by Asif Iqbal 11 Dec '20

11 Dec '20

I am faling to connect to gmail. Not sure what that bind error means. iqbala@ghar:~$ sudo stunnel4 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Snagged 64 random bytes from /home/iqbala/.rnd 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to /home/iqbala/.rnd 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: RAND_status claims sufficient entropy for the PRNG 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: PRNG seeded successfully 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Certificate: /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Certificate loaded 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Key file: /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Private key loaded 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: SSL context initialized for service ssmtp 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG5[3839:3083650736]: stunnel 4.22 on i486-pc-linux-gnu with OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG5[3839:3083650736]: Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Sockets:POLL,IPv6 Auth:LIBWRAP 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG6[3839:3083650736]: file ulimit = 1024 (can be changed with 'ulimit -n') 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG6[3839:3083650736]: poll() used - no FD_SETSIZE limit for file descriptors 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG5[3839:3083650736]: 500 clients allowed 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: FD 10 in non-blocking mode 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: FD 11 in non-blocking mode 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: FD 12 in non-blocking mode 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: SO_REUSEADDR option set on accept socket 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG3[3839:3083650736]: Error binding ssmtp to 74.125.93.111:587 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG3[3839:3083650736]: bind: Cannot assign requested address (99) Here is how my conf file looks like iqbala@ghar:~$ cat /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf | egrep -v "^;|^$" cert = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem foreground = yes sslVersion = SSLv3 chroot = /var/lib/stunnel4/ setuid = stunnel4 setgid = stunnel4 pid = /stunnel4.pid socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 debug = 7 output = /var/log/stunnel4/stunnel.log client = yes [ssmtp] accept = smtp.gmail.com:587 connect = 25 Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu

5 9

stunnel and hosts.allow
by Yousef Alhashemi 06 Jul '16

06 Jul '16

Hi, This may be a little bit off-topic, but does anyone here use stunnel with pan? My connections to stunnel (in pan) are always refused by libwrap. I was looking for the right rule to add to /etc/hosts.allow but nothing seems to work aside from "ALL : ALL" (which is obviously not good) and "nntps: KNOWN". Is the latter reasonable? The hosts_access(5) manpage is confusing to say the least. It mentions that daemon (the first token on any line) is the name of the daemon running the process, which would be "stunnel" in my case, but using "stunnel : LOCAL" or even "stunnel : ALL" doesn't work. The rule that seems to work, as mentioned, is "nntps : KNOWN" ("nntps" being the group name in stunnel.conf). What's even more confusing to me is that "nntps : LOCAL" does not work either. Nor does "nntps : localhost 127.0.0.1", "nntps : localhost", "nntps : 127.0.0.1", or "nntps : 192.168.1.". Pan is running on the same machine as stunnel so all connections must be coming from localhost. Why do these rules not trigger? Either way, I'd like to know the "least permissive" hosts.allow rule that would allow me to connect to my news provider from pan, and/or whether "nntps : KNOWN" is a safe option. Thanks, Yousef

3 6

Can't compile stunnel 5.10 on Linux ... got fatal signal 11 error
by amontaron 03 Feb '15

03 Feb '15

Hi everybody ! I tried to compile stunnel 5.10 (latest) on my old Suse 7 Linux distrib and got "a fatal signal 11 error message" when doing the make command. Just before, openssl 1.0.2 (latest) compile fine with no errors. Also, I add some stuffs like xemacs 21.4.22 (latest) just to say that that rather old distrib is able to do all that :-D So, here is the latest messages from make I got : > Making all in src > make[1]: Entering directory `/root/stunnel-5.10/src' > make all-am > make[2]: Entering directory `/root/stunnel-5.10/src' > source='stunnel.c' object='stunnel-stunnel.o' libtool=no \ > DEPDIR=.deps depmode=gcc /bin/sh ../auto/depcomp \ > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/usr/kerberos/include > -I/usr/local/ssl/include -DLIBDIR='"/usr/local/lib/stunnel"' > -DCONFDIR='"/usr/local/etc/stunnel"' -g -O2 -pthread -Wall > -Wformat=2 -Wconversion -Wno-long-long -Wno-deprecated-declarations > -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c -o stunnel-stunnel.o `test -f 'stunnel.c' || > echo './'`stunnel.c > In file included from /usr/include/string.h:346, > from common.h:201, > from stunnel.c:38: > /usr/include/bits/string2.h: In function `__strsep_g': > /usr/include/bits/string2.h:1171: warning: passing arg 2 of > `__strpbrk_c2' with different width due to prototype > /usr/include/bits/string2.h:1171: warning: passing arg 3 of > `__strpbrk_c2' with different width due to prototype > /usr/include/bits/string2.h:1171: warning: passing arg 2 of > `__strpbrk_c3' with different width due to prototype > /usr/include/bits/string2.h:1171: warning: passing arg 3 of > `__strpbrk_c3' with different width due to prototype > /usr/include/bits/string2.h:1171: warning: passing arg 4 of > `__strpbrk_c3' with different width due to prototype > gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11 > make[2]: *** [stunnel-stunnel.o] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/stunnel-5.10/src' > make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/stunnel-5.10/src' > make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Previously got lots of warning messages. Perhaps need "make report" also ? I've look at stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org mail archive up to July 2011 with no success. So, that's why I'm writting to you there... Then, I tried different versions of stunnel 4.xx like 4.00, 4.56, 4.28 and more. All simply don't compile with differents errors messages. The only one I could compile completly is stunnel 3.22 (so latest 3.xx) Note that I'm happy with that because I was running stunnel 3.3 just before and that everything works with the latest openssl version I download and everything works fine for what I would ! Remark: Suse7 distrib (not OpenSuse) is Linux 2.2.16 kernel (not latest :-D) Alex. PS: Another things, on the same machine I ran stunnel 4.56 on (old) Windows 98 with no problems. --- Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection avast! Antivirus est active. http://www.avast.com

2 2

issue with stunnel forwarding
by David 03 Feb '15

03 Feb '15

I am trying to configure stunnel on a bridge server which needs to use ssl to talk to 3 others servers. below is my conf file: ; ***************************************** Example SSL server mode services [ xyz ] accept=10.10.10.74:9908 connect= 127.0.0.10:1040 transparent = source[ hp ] accept=10.10.10.218:9904 connect=127.0.0.10:1041 transparent = source[ sql] accept=10.10.10.214:59053 connect=127.0.0.10:1042 transparent = source when I run the stunnel GUI start I get following message: [ ] No limit detected for the number of clients [.] stunnel 5.10 on x86-pc-msvc-1500 platform [.] Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.0.1l 15 Jan 2015 [.] Threading:WIN32 Sockets:SELECT,IPv6 TLS:ENGINE,FIPS,OCSP,PSK,SNI [ ] errno: (*_errno()) [.] Reading configuration from file stunnel.conf [ ] GUI message loop initialized [.] UTF-8 byte order mark detected [ ] Enabling support for engine "capi" [ ] Initializing engine #1 (capi) [ ] Engine #1 (capi) initialized [.] FIPS mode disabled [ ] Compression disabled [ ] Snagged 64 random bytes from C:/.rnd [ ] Wrote 1024 new random bytes to C:/.rnd [ ] PRNG seeded successfully [!] Line 62: "transparent = source": Specified option name is not valid here[!] Server is down what am I missing here? thanks! nazja2015

2 1

Re: [stunnel-users] Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3
by Sebastian Ochsenkühn 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

Hi Mike, thanks for your fast response, but I think there is a big issue. The latest version that is available in the CENTOS 6 Base Repo is "stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64" - In this version the SSLv3 is disabled by default, but there is not option to enable it. I hope you understand my situation :-) ________________________________ Von: stunnel-users <stunnel-users-bounces(a)stunnel.org> im Auftrag von Michal Trojnara <Michal.Trojnara(a)mirt.net> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015 11:44 An: stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org Betreff: Re: [stunnel-users] Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3 Hi Sebastian, My documentation describes the latest version of stunnel. For an old version please refer to the appropriate manual page distributed with the specific version you're using. Mike On 29.01.2015 11:40, Sebastian Ochsenkühn wrote: Hi, I have a big problem with the new stunnel version on CentOS 6.6 (stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64) that is available in the CentOS base repository. You describe in your documentation that SSLv3 is disabled by default. -> OK for me, but I need SSLv3 and the option with -NO_SSLv3 is not working?! PS: this is also not working with -NO_SSLv2 option. options = -NO_SSLv3 = NOT Working option = NO_SSLv3 = Working. Currently i have installed an older version, where the SSLv3 protocoll is not disabled by default. Is there anything that I'm doing wrong? Thanks and Regards, Sebastian. _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org<mailto:stunnel-users@stunnel.org> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

2 1

Re: [stunnel-users] Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3
by Sebastian Ochsenkühn 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

Hi Mike, yes your correct, but I have forced the installation with "stunnel-4.29-3.el6_4.x86_64" ( all other packages openssl, etc. updated) and SSLv3 is working again. So, for my understanding there must be a bug or they have disabled SSLv3 in version "stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64". Regards, Sebastian. ________________________________ Von: stunnel-users <stunnel-users-bounces(a)stunnel.org> im Auftrag von Michal Trojnara <Michal.Trojnara(a)mirt.net> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015 12:12 An: stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org Betreff: Re: [stunnel-users] Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3 Hi Sebastian, The ChangeLog does not say anything about disabling SSLv3: http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/centos/updates/6.6/x86_64/Packages/stunnel-4.2… I guess it may be disabled in the OpenSSL rather than in stunnel. Anyway, if you connect stunnel with some software that's so old that it doesn't support TLS, the software is almost certainly no longer supported, and most likely vulnerable to attacks. This is a serious risk! Mike On 29.01.2015 11:58, Sebastian Ochsenkühn wrote: Hi Mike, thanks for your fast response, but I think there is a big issue. The latest version that is available in the CENTOS 6 Base Repo is "stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64" - In this version the SSLv3 is disabled by default, but there is not option to enable it. I hope you understand my situation :-) ________________________________ Von: stunnel-users <stunnel-users-bounces(a)stunnel.org><mailto:stunnel-users-bounces@stunnel.org> im Auftrag von Michal Trojnara <Michal.Trojnara(a)mirt.net><mailto:Michal.Trojnara@mirt.net> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015 11:44 An: stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org<mailto:stunnel-users@stunnel.org> Betreff: Re: [stunnel-users] Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3 Hi Sebastian, My documentation describes the latest version of stunnel. For an old version please refer to the appropriate manual page distributed with the specific version you're using. Mike On 29.01.2015 11:40, Sebastian Ochsenkühn wrote: Hi, I have a big problem with the new stunnel version on CentOS 6.6 (stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64) that is available in the CentOS base repository. You describe in your documentation that SSLv3 is disabled by default. -> OK for me, but I need SSLv3 and the option with -NO_SSLv3 is not working?! PS: this is also not working with -NO_SSLv2 option. options = -NO_SSLv3 = NOT Working option = NO_SSLv3 = Working. Currently i have installed an older version, where the SSLv3 protocoll is not disabled by default. Is there anything that I'm doing wrong? Thanks and Regards, Sebastian. _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org<mailto:stunnel-users@stunnel.org> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

1 0

Centos 6.6 Final stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64 - options set problem SSLv3
by Sebastian Ochsenkühn 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

Hi, I have a big problem with the new stunnel version on CentOS 6.6 (stunnel-4.29-3.el6_6.1.x86_64) that is available in the CentOS base repository. You describe in your documentation that SSLv3 is disabled by default. -> OK for me, but I need SSLv3 and the option with -NO_SSLv3 is not working?! PS: this is also not working with -NO_SSLv2 option. options = -NO_SSLv3 = NOT Working option = NO_SSLv3 = Working. Currently i have installed an older version, where the SSLv3 protocoll is not disabled by default. Is there anything that I'm doing wrong? Thanks and Regards, Sebastian.

1 0

Blue Iris
by Patrick wickline 23 Jan '15

23 Jan '15

I have stunnel set up on my machine. It works locally and lets me connect to my Blue Iris server with https. However, I am unable to do this remotely. I have forwarded the port in my router to stunnel, from stunnel to blue iris, but still doesn't work. Below is part of my conf file [Blue Iris] accept = 8344 (forwarded this in the router to my static IP of my machine) connect = 127.0.0.1:8081 (8081 is my blue iris web server) I hope someone is able to give some advice

2 1

stunnel 5.10 released
by Michal Trojnara 22 Jan '15

22 Jan '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Users, I have released version 5.10 of stunnel. The ChangeLog entry: Version 5.10, 2015.01.22, urgency: LOW: * New features - OCSP AIA (Authority Information Access) support. This feature can be enabled with the new service-level option "OCSPaia". - Additional security features of the linker are enabled: "-z relro", "-z now", "-z noexecstack". * Bugfixes - OpenSSL DLLs updated to version 1.0.1l. https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20150108.txt - FIPS canister updated to version 2.0.9 in the Win32 binary build. Home page: https://www.stunnel.org/ Download: https://www.stunnel.org/downloads.html SHA-256 hashes: 032bfc1854f8a0b9e452343c36ec6b52c7e0daef0863423c6b13a61a7c92eb23 stunnel-5.10.tar.gz 7c29753b6488f37b29f365e9c4a6060c3da8a89000af1cd29eab7c37d419d148 stunnel-5.10-installer.exe 93cd0941580eaa7815ed62ec88a111cb449e9bad97cd1a35d7524867a8238234 stunnel-5.10-android.zip Best regards, Mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlTBMTsACgkQ/NU+nXTHMtE+uQCg9N0butSpAQ2mM1M5ySe7T18i oe8AoOAHKJ9F7jMlUfHnmuzBtIPbbghN =e9ed -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] No DNS lookup?
by Colin van der Zanden 21 Jan '15

21 Jan '15

Ludolf, Thanks for your quick response. I have no clue on how to respond on the stunnel users list, so i'll try it this way. The support on the host we are trying to reach states to following: It really sounds like the stunnel is not connecting to "something.host.com" but perhaps to the IP address behind it? The use of the hostname something.host.com is however an requirement. Is there anyway we can force the stunnel to connect to the hostname instead of resolving it as an IP adress? Met vriendelijke groeten, H.N. Post en Zonen Colin van der Zanden c.vanderzanden(a)duurzaam-transport.com c.vanderzanden(a)hnpostenzonen.nl <dm.post(a)hnpostenzonen.nl> ---------------------------------------------- Dit e-mailbericht is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n). Wilt u direct contact met ons opnemen indien deze e-mail bij vergissing bij u terecht is gekomen? Wij verzoeken u in dat geval de e-mail te vernietigen, de inhoud ervan niet te gebruiken en niet onder derden te verspreiden, omdat het bericht vertrouwelijke informatie kan bevatten, beschermd door een beroepsgeheim.

5 5

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

stunnel-users January 2015