stunnel-users May 2016

stunnel-users@stunnel.org

20 participants
33 discussions

Requests to cloud server that requires host header
by Lorne Kates 13 Nov '24

13 Nov '24

(related to Akamai message from before-- but I have better troubleshooting information). I'm tying to route traffic through stunnel to a "cloud" based-endpoint. That endpoint has a static server name-- test.authorize.net. (This is the dev sandbox for auth.net). But if you do an nslookup on test.authorize.net, you'll get back a different servername and IP, because it's so wonderfully "cloud". Stunnel apparently tries to connect to the nslookup value. The server rejects the request because it can't route it back to test.authorize.net. I've tried adding "delay = yes" and "sni = test.authorize.net", but neither work. To see this in action, a simple setup with any accept, then connect to test.authorize.net:443 in client = yes mode. This is what a valid response looks like (13 -- give me the darn merchant ID in a POST): https://test.authorize.net/gateway/transact.dll This is what you'll get if you try to use stunnel (400 invalid url) : https://23.195.204.150/gateway/transact.dll So how can I get stunnel to send the proper Request Header (host: test.authorize.net), make sure it's using http/1.1, etc?

4 3

Stunnel 4 failing to connect to gmail
by Asif Iqbal 11 Dec '20

11 Dec '20

I am faling to connect to gmail. Not sure what that bind error means. iqbala@ghar:~$ sudo stunnel4 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Snagged 64 random bytes from /home/iqbala/.rnd 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to /home/iqbala/.rnd 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: RAND_status claims sufficient entropy for the PRNG 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: PRNG seeded successfully 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Certificate: /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Certificate loaded 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Key file: /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Private key loaded 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: SSL context initialized for service ssmtp 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG5[3839:3083650736]: stunnel 4.22 on i486-pc-linux-gnu with OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG5[3839:3083650736]: Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Sockets:POLL,IPv6 Auth:LIBWRAP 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG6[3839:3083650736]: file ulimit = 1024 (can be changed with 'ulimit -n') 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG6[3839:3083650736]: poll() used - no FD_SETSIZE limit for file descriptors 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG5[3839:3083650736]: 500 clients allowed 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: FD 10 in non-blocking mode 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: FD 11 in non-blocking mode 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: FD 12 in non-blocking mode 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: SO_REUSEADDR option set on accept socket 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG3[3839:3083650736]: Error binding ssmtp to 74.125.93.111:587 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG3[3839:3083650736]: bind: Cannot assign requested address (99) Here is how my conf file looks like iqbala@ghar:~$ cat /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf | egrep -v "^;|^$" cert = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem foreground = yes sslVersion = SSLv3 chroot = /var/lib/stunnel4/ setuid = stunnel4 setgid = stunnel4 pid = /stunnel4.pid socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 debug = 7 output = /var/log/stunnel4/stunnel.log client = yes [ssmtp] accept = smtp.gmail.com:587 connect = 25 Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu

5 9

Stunnel & Gmail security
by BOXI31 TEST 17 Oct '20

17 Oct '20

Hi all, To make "Stunnel 5.31" work with Gmail, I have to go in security settings of Gmail and "allow less secure apps to access my account". Is it mandatory ? Is it possible to set Stunnel to access Gmail without lowering it security level ? How ? I checked in log file TLS v1.2 is used by Stunnel but Gmail still consider it as a "less secure app." ! Regards, Steve

2 1

Re: [stunnel-users] Public domain [PATCH] support environment variables in config file
by Dmitry Bakshaev 21 Dec '16

21 Dec '16

2016-05-31 12:02 GMT+04:00 Pierre Delaage <delaage.pierre(a)free.fr>: > Did not have a look at the code yet, but should it be possible to replace > envvars usage by some keys in the registry on windows platform and/or > %userprofile%/config-file ? > > Anyway, my opinion on the patch is that there is no real interest for > "generic/self-expanding" config file , and it is even dangerous : > I would not trust stunnel if, at run time, its config could be modified by > USER envvars... > which difference between %userprofile%/config-file and USER envvars? both are USER owned and USER controlled. certificate and keys also USER private data. and stunnel started by USER owned by USER. if stunnel started by SYSTEM/ADMIN he uses SYSTEM/ADMIN envvars (if needed), certs, keys, etc. global "generic/self-expanding" config file is ADMIN owned. USER has permissions to substitute some values, restricted by ADMIN.

2 10

stunnel and hosts.allow
by Yousef Alhashemi 06 Jul '16

06 Jul '16

Hi, This may be a little bit off-topic, but does anyone here use stunnel with pan? My connections to stunnel (in pan) are always refused by libwrap. I was looking for the right rule to add to /etc/hosts.allow but nothing seems to work aside from "ALL : ALL" (which is obviously not good) and "nntps: KNOWN". Is the latter reasonable? The hosts_access(5) manpage is confusing to say the least. It mentions that daemon (the first token on any line) is the name of the daemon running the process, which would be "stunnel" in my case, but using "stunnel : LOCAL" or even "stunnel : ALL" doesn't work. The rule that seems to work, as mentioned, is "nntps : KNOWN" ("nntps" being the group name in stunnel.conf). What's even more confusing to me is that "nntps : LOCAL" does not work either. Nor does "nntps : localhost 127.0.0.1", "nntps : localhost", "nntps : 127.0.0.1", or "nntps : 192.168.1.". Pan is running on the same machine as stunnel so all connections must be coming from localhost. Why do these rules not trigger? Either way, I'd like to know the "least permissive" hosts.allow rule that would allow me to connect to my news provider from pan, and/or whether "nntps : KNOWN" is a safe option. Thanks, Yousef

3 6

Re: [stunnel-users] Public domain [PATCH] support environment variables in config file
by Dmitry Bakshaev 31 May '16

31 May '16

2016-05-31 12:02 GMT+04:00 Pierre Delaage <delaage.pierre(a)free.fr>: > Hi Michal, > Did not have a look at the code yet, but should it be possible to replace > envvars usage by some keys in the registry on windows platform and/or > %userprofile%/config-file ? > why not just start stunnel with config parameter on command line? stunnel %USERPROFILE%/stunnel-config-file (windows) stunnel ${HOME}/stunnel-config-file (*nix)

2 1

Re: [stunnel-users] IPv4 and IPv6
by Konstantin Belousov 31 May '16

31 May '16

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:04:24AM +0200, Micha?? Trojnara wrote: > On 31.05.2016 00:42, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > I have a following configuration for the outgoing connection > > [XXX-1] > > client = yes > > accept = 127.0.0.1:1564 > > connect = some-server:9999 > > local = some-other-address > [cut] > > The socket was created with INET6 address family, but bind was done for > > INET AF. > > This is pretty much expected if "some-server:9999" is an IPv6 address > and "some-other-address" is an IPv4 address. The "local" option indeed > cannot handle a mix of IPv4 and IPv6 "connect" addresses. Usually some-server is the list of addresses, one of them is IPv4, and another is IPv6. This is the only reasonable way to name dual-stack host. > > What do you think might be a proper solution? I would expect that the code which binds the socket for connect(2), matched the address types before binding. A good implementation needs to iterate over the results of getaddrinfo(3) for remote host to try to connect to each returned address. In the same manner, when one outgoing address is attempted to connect to, the getaddrinfo(3) list for the local address would be iterated over, and first matched compatible address selected for binding. It seems that it is enough to match addrinfo pairs by ai_family/ai_socktype/ai_protocol, but you might also need to e.g. pay some attention to filter out IPv4 mapped to IPv6 entries. I am not sure how much additional plumbing is required to have local getaddrinfo(3) result in the local_bind().

1 0

IPv4 and IPv6
by Konstantin Belousov 31 May '16

31 May '16

Hi. I have a following configuration for the outgoing connection [XXX-1] client = yes accept = 127.0.0.1:1564 connect = some-server:9999 local = some-other-address Sometimes, or rather, quite regular, the connection to localhost port 1564 results in immediate connection close and logging the following: May 30 23:06:58 tom stunnel: LOG5[4]: Service [XXX-1] accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:12848 May 30 23:06:58 tom stunnel: LOG3[4]: local_bind (ephemeral port): Invalid argument (22) I traced the syscalls and see the following: 28196 stunnel CALL socket(PF_INET6,SOCK_STREAM,IPPROTO_IP) 28196 stunnel RET socket 10/0xa 28196 stunnel CALL fcntl(0xa,F_GETFL,0) 28196 stunnel RET fcntl 2 28196 stunnel CALL fcntl(0xa,F_SETFL,0x6<O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK>) 28196 stunnel RET fcntl 0 28196 stunnel CALL fcntl(0xa,F_SETFD,FD_CLOEXEC) 28196 stunnel RET fcntl 0 28196 stunnel CALL bind(0xa,0x802808a6c,0x10) 28196 stunnel STRU struct sockaddr { AF_INET, 176.36.249.139:0 } 28196 stunnel RET bind -1 errno 22 Invalid argument The socket was created with INET6 address family, but bind was done for INET AF. Indeed, both some-server and some-other-address have both A and AAAA records, corresponding addresses are configured and functional. OS is FreeBSD, I was ensured that this combination (INET6 socket and INET bind) is not correct. It probably works sometime when first resolved addresses for names happen to come from the same address family, but when resolvers return different order, the situation above occurs. Disabling ipv6 support makes the connection work reliably, which confirms my observations. I am using stunnel 5.31. Would be nice to have this fixed. Thanks.

1 0

Public domain [PATCH] support environment variables in config file
by Dmitry Bakshaev 28 May '16

28 May '16

the problem frequently occurs on the client side: admin need to configure stunnel for multiple users. every user has own key, certificate, own permissions on file system (for log-files, etc) this patch allow to write flexible config. some examples: cert = %USERPROFILE%\.config\my.pem (windows) cert = ${HOME}/.config/my.pem (other) output = %APPDATA%\stunnel.log (windows) output = ${HOME}/stunnel.log (other) CAfile = %ALLUSERSPROFILE%\ourCAbundle.crt (windows) CAfile = /etc/ssl/certs/ourCAbundle.crt (other, not using variables) "secure" :) random port example: ... [srv1] accept = 127.0.0.1:%SRV1_PORT% (windows) accept = 127.0.0.1:${SRV1_PORT} (other) ... start stunnel (batch-file or shell-script): set SRV1_PORT=%RANDOM% (windows) limitations: 1. don't support unicode on windows (localized usernames, files, etc) 2. only ${NAME} syntax supported on *nix (not $NAME).

2 1

Potential performance degradation moving from Stunnel 5.06 to 5.32
by Mark Brookes 24 May '16

24 May '16

There might be a throughput degradation in the more recent versions of stunnel. I have recently been testing the 5.32 version of stunnel and have noticed that the tps drop quite significantly when moving from 5.06 to 5.32. Im willing to admit it could be something to do with my config or testing. But if anyone could offer some suggestions it would be much appreciated. The config is setup as follows - Stunnel VIP -> Haproxy. (I have configured haproxy to return a simple page). I am using a self signed 1024 bit certificate and the cipher I am using is ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (I also tested with aNull:eNULL:MD5:LOW:HIGH and noticed a similar drop in performance) My Stunnel config is - setuid = stunnel pid = /var/run/stunnel/stunnel.pid debug = local1.0 socket = a:IP_FREEBIND=yes socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 [VIP_Name-1] cert = /root/server1024.pem ciphers = ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 accept = 192.168.80.131:443 connect = 127.0.0.1:80 connect = 127.0.0.2:80 delay = no options = CIPHER_SERVER_PREFERENCE options = DONT_INSERT_EMPTY_FRAGMENTS renegotiation = no TIMEOUTclose = 0 My HAProxy config is - global daemon stats socket /var/run/haproxy.stat mode 600 level admin pidfile /var/run/haproxy.pid maxconn 100000 tune.maxrewrite 1024 nbproc 3 defaults #mode http #balance roundrobin timeout connect 4000 timeout client 42000 timeout server 43000 peers loadbalancer_replication peer lbmaster localhost:7778 peer lbslave localhost:7778 listen VIP_Name bind 127.0.0.1:80 transparent #bind 192.168.80.121:80 transparent monitor-uri / mode http errorfile 200 /etc/haproxy/200.http listen VIP_Name_2 monitor-uri / mode http bind 127.0.0.2:80 transparent errorfile 200 /etc/haproxy/200.http All the versions of stunnel mentioned here have been built against Openssl1.0.1s I am using siege to generate the load and issuing the following command - siege https://192.168.80.131 -t1M -c 15 -b The test is stop stunnel service, replace stunnel binary with different version, restart service, run test. The results im seeing are as follows (All results are quoted in transactions per second as reported by siege). v5.06 - 2233 v5.07 - 2229 v5.25 - 2171 v5.30 - 2092 v5.32 - 302 In my results you can see roughly a 200 tps drop from version 5.06 to v5.30 then when we get to v5.32 it drops further. To reiterate the only thing I am changing in my configuration is the stunnel binary. Everything else is remaining the same. Does anyone have any ideas what could be happening? Thankyou Mark

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

stunnel-users May 2016