September 2024 - stunnel-users

stunnel FIPS mode 140-2/ Other Modes
by mehmet ozisik 19 Sep '25

19 Sep '25

Hi All, I would like to ask a question about stunnel fips mode. There are lots of question and answers on the internet related with this, but I could not find any answer related with mine. I am compiling with openssl (auto detecting fips) . Here is a part of confgiure output : checking for FIPS_mode_set... yes configure: FIPS mode detected So I am thinking that fips also is being included. Then I try to run stunnel on target platform (in stunnel.conf fips=yes) and it gives below error : Compiled/running with OpenSSL 0.9.8w-fips 23 Apr 2012 Threading:PTHREAD Sockets:POLL,IPv6 SSL:ENGINE,OCSP,FIPS Reading configuration from file stunnel.conf FIPS_mode_set: 2D06906E: error:2D06906E:FIPS routines:FIPS_CHECK_INCORE_FINGERPRINT:fingerprint does not match there are lots of information about this errror on internet. Then when I configure stunnel.conf with fips=no, stunnel is running successfully. I know that fips=yes means that enables FIPS 140-2 mode and I guess my fips canister does not supoort fips 140-2 mode (I do not know which fips mode it has supported). Now my question is coming : When I set fips=no, stunnel also starts with other available fips modes which the canister included? Or it skips running fips mode completely? Plase inform me if anyone has any idea? Regards

2 1

stunnel - client conexion close by TLS alert (write) fatal decode error
by Rodigo Alvarez 07 Mar '25

07 Mar '25

Hi All! I would appreciate any clue to solve the problem we are having with a client mode service that stopped working this week (we verified that the service works directly without stunnel). The error I identify in the trace is the following: "TLS alert (write): fatal: decode error" Stunnel Config (windows version): [afip-prod-fce] client = yes accept = ARSASSRV4DMS06:1031 connect = serviciosjava.afip.gob.ar:443 debug = 7 ws: https://serviciosjava.afip.gob.ar/wsfecred/FECredService Complete trace: 2024.01.24 09:28:46 LOG5[main]: stunnel 5.71 on x64-pc-mingw32-gnu platform 2024.01.24 09:28:46 LOG5[main]: Compiled/running with OpenSSL 3.1.3 19 Sep 2023 2024.01.24 09:28:46 LOG5[main]: Threading:WIN32 Sockets:SELECT,IPv6 TLS:ENGINE,OCSP,PSK,SNI 2024.01.24 09:28:46 LOG5[main]: Reading configuration from file C:\Program Files (x86)\stunnel\config\stunnel.conf 2024.01.24 09:28:46 LOG5[main]: UTF-8 byte order mark detected 2024.01.24 09:28:46 LOG5[main]: FIPS mode disabled 2024.01.24 09:28:46 LOG4[main]: Service [afip-prod-fce] needs authentication to prevent MITM attacks 2024.01.24 09:28:46 LOG5[main]: Configuration successful 2024.01.24 09:29:23 LOG7[0]: Service [afip-prod-fce] started 2024.01.24 09:29:23 LOG7[0]: Setting local socket options (FD=892) 2024.01.24 09:29:23 LOG7[0]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2024.01.24 09:29:23 LOG5[0]: Service [afip-prod-fce] accepted connection from 10.70.162.24:57723 2024.01.24 09:29:23 LOG6[0]: s_connect: connecting 200.1.116.19:443 2024.01.24 09:29:23 LOG7[0]: s_connect: s_poll_wait 200.1.116.19:443: waiting 10 seconds 2024.01.24 09:29:23 LOG7[0]: FD=896 ifds=rwx ofds=--- 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG5[0]: s_connect: connected 200.1.116.19:443 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG5[0]: Service [afip-prod-fce] connected remote server from 10.72.0.69:64788 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: Setting remote socket options (FD=896) 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on remote socket 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: Remote descriptor (FD=896) initialized 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG6[0]: SNI: sending servername: serviciosjava.afip.gob.ar 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG6[0]: Peer certificate not required 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: TLS state (connect): before SSL initialization 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: Initializing application specific data for session authenticated 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS write client hello 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS write client hello 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS read server hello 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG6[0]: CERT: Certificate verification disabled 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG6[0]: CERT: Certificate verification disabled 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG6[0]: CERT: Certificate verification disabled 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS read server certificate 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS read server key exchange 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: OCSP stapling: Client callback called 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG6[0]: OCSP: Certificate chain verification disabled 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG6[0]: Client certificate not requested 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS read server done 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS write client key exchange 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS write change cipher spec 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS write finished 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS write finished 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS read change cipher spec 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: TLS state (connect): SSLv3/TLS read finished 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: New session callback 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: Peer certificate was cached (6643 bytes) 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG6[0]: Session id: D63C79766AC02C9A3E8494AD528954A183E9F7C250856695BA05C16A2219A4B3 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: 1 client connect(s) requested 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: 1 client connect(s) succeeded 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: 0 client renegotiation(s) requested 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: 0 session reuse(s) 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG6[0]: TLS connected: new session negotiated 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG6[0]: TLSv1.2 ciphersuite: ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128-bit encryption) 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG6[0]: Peer temporary key: ECDH, P-256, 256 bits 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: Compression: null, expansion: null 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: Remove session callback 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: TLS alert (write): fatal: decode error 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG6[0]: TLS socket closed (SSL_read) 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: Sent socket write shutdown 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG5[0]: Connection closed: 1755 byte(s) sent to TLS, 634 byte(s) sent to socket 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: Remote descriptor (FD=896) closed 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: Local descriptor (FD=892) closed 2024.01.24 09:29:24 LOG7[0]: Service [afip-prod-fce] finished (0 left) Thank you! Kind regards, Rodrigo.

3 3

Requests to cloud server that requires host header
by Lorne Kates 13 Nov '24

13 Nov '24

(related to Akamai message from before-- but I have better troubleshooting information). I'm tying to route traffic through stunnel to a "cloud" based-endpoint. That endpoint has a static server name-- test.authorize.net. (This is the dev sandbox for auth.net) But if you do an nslookup on test.authorize.net, you'll get back a different servername and IP, because it's so wonderfully "cloud". Stunnel apparently tries to connect to the nslookup value. The server rejects the request because it can't route it back to test.authorize.net. I've tried adding "delay = yes" and "sni = test.authorize.net", but neither work. To see this in action, a simple setup with any accept, then connect to test.authorize.net:443 in client = yes mode. This is what a valid response looks like (13 -- give me the darn merchant ID in a POST): https://test.authorize.net/gateway/transact.dll This is what you'll get if you try to use stunnel (400 invalid url) : https://23.195.204.150/gateway/transact.dll So how can I get stunnel to send the proper Request Header (host: test.authorize.net) make sure it's using http/1.1, etc?

4 3

Re: [stunnel-users] CPU 100%
by Eric Eberhard 06 Nov '24

06 Nov '24

Long ago I had a server with a bad network card. Every once in a while it would spew uncontrollable bytes onto the network. If you open a stunnel connection and it does that this could very well be the problem. If it cheap, try changing the network card. If not, you should be able to look in your firewall/router and it will tell you who is sending what bytes to whomever. See if that machine is indeed streaming the bytes in massive quantities. If not, I would suspect your stunnel is getting stuck in it's own loop. There are a million reasons this can happen (well a few less than a million) - such as maybe a bad library in the FreeBSD or a bad choice in the Makefile - such as doing threads or something in a way your O/S does not like (I use threads=fork or whatever it is, instead of actual threading). You might tinker with some of the options that make the stunnel build and try different ones. Especially if stunnel was compiled on a different version of the O/S - could be differences in bytes in things and who knows what. That is all I can suggest beyond setting the debug level to 7 (I think is highest) and then watching the log file. Eric From: stunnel-users [mailto:stunnel-users-bounces@stunnel.org] On Behalf Of Murrey, Brian J. Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 10:57 AM To: stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org Subject: [stunnel-users] CPU 100% We are running stunnel 5.49 on FreeBSD 11.2 and we're running into a problem once in a while. CPU pegs at 100% when we get an stunnel connection from one of our external devices. This affects 100% of all cores and we can't even log in to console. To mitigate this temporarily, we have a script running in the background to watch when stunnel begins to spike and restarts the daemon. It doesn't happen 100% of the time, and so far I have been unable to distinguish what makes the connection do this to the CPU. Have any of you run in to this issue? Sincerely, Brian Murrey System Engineer II, IT Infrastructure _____ NOTICE: This message may contain privileged and confidential information and/or protected health information intended solely for the use of the named recipient and may be privileged or otherwise protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you should immediately notify the sender and delete this message. Do not disseminate, reproduce, or review this message or attachments if you are not the intended recipient. The sender or others may have legal rights restricting the dissemination of the information contained in this message and, as a result, remedies against you in the event of the improper dissemination of confidential information, trade secrets, personal information or privileged communications. This message is the work of the sender and does not necessarily reflect the position, views, or policies of TriMedx LLC or its affiliates. WARNING: The integrity and security of this message cannot be guaranteed and may contain or transmit a virus or other illicit code. Neither TriMedx LLC or its affiliates accept liability for any damage attributable to viruses or illicit code transmitted through this message or an attachment.

2 1

stunnel overhead: Tunneling over stunnel - How does this affect MTU?
by Marek Küthe 15 Oct '24

15 Oct '24

Hello, I am tunneling packets via stunnel using OpenVPN. I would now like to have an MTU in my tunnel where no fragmentation occurs. Hence my question: What overhead does stunnel introduce? Is the plaintext with a length one-to-one translated into the ciphertext? How large is the stunnel / TLS header? I look forward to any answer! Regards Marek Küthe -- Marek Küthe m.k(a)mk16.de er/ihm he/him

1 0

Newbie: installation and config
by ajbguinto＠yahoo.com 30 Sep '24

30 Sep '24

Hi, I am tasked to make stunnel work in our organization but a newbie I seem not to be able to follow the instructions for installation. can you help me out? plan to install this on our servers that will cater to oracle / mssql in transit data encryption. how do I know if im installing on a client or a server? will this work standalone (server will act as server and client too). how will this be configured.

2 5

External PSK and TLS 1.3
by mike ads 18 Sep '24

18 Sep '24

Hello, I'm looking for a solution to connect to a server using TLS 1.3 and an external PSK. Does stunnel support this? I see that there are configuration options to set TLS 1.3, and configuration options to specify a PSK; if those were used together, would that result in TLS 1.3 with the PSK? If so, how would I choose between ephemeral vs non-ephemeral DH? This doesn't seem to be an option. Ephemeral is an important choice for forward secrecy. Would it default to ephemeral? Thank you.

1 0

stunnel 5.73 released
by Michał Trojnara 09 Sep '24

09 Sep '24

Dear Users, I have released version 5.73 of stunnel. ### Version 5.73, 2024.09.09, urgency: MEDIUM * Security bugfixes - OpenSSL DLLs updated to version 3.3.2. - OpenSSL FIPS Provider updated to version 3.0.9. * Bugfixes - Fixed a memory leak while reloading stunnel.conf sections with "client=yes" and "delay=no". - Fixed TIMEOUTocsp with values greater than 4. - Fix the IPv6 test on a non-IPv6 machine. * Features - HELO replaced with EHLO in the post-STARTTLS SMTP protocol negotiation (thx to Peter Pentchev). - OCSP stapling fetches moved away from server threads. - Improved client-side session resumption. - Added support for the mimalloc allocator. - Check for protocolHost moved to configuration file processing for the client-side CONNECT protocol. - Clarified some confusing OpenSSL's certificate verification error messages. - stunnel.nsi updated for Debian 13 and Fedora. - Improved NetBSD compatibility. Home page: https://www.stunnel.org/ Download: https://www.stunnel.org/downloads.html SHA-256 hashes: bc917c3bcd943a4d632360c067977a31e85e385f5f4845f69749bce88183cb38 stunnel-5.73.tar.gz d686b1a4135947718e7a8157a8cb6694ed50e2267713de1972941148a8859789 stunnel-5.73-win64-installer.exe 9d6065ea1e7fa59405b5a152eeeaed9296bd5a0d2b11964800e95867e7391f16 stunnel-5.73-android.zip Best regards, Mike

1 0

Re: GMail and OAuth 2.0
by meirman＠fastmail.com 02 Sep '24

02 Sep '24

I would prefer to use stunnel, which I used for 10 or 20 years until recently, but this proxy is supposed to work for the new problem: SIMON ROB'S EMAIL-OAUTH2-PROXY Go to https://github.com/simonrob/email-oauth2-proxy/releases Download emailproxy-YYYY-MM-DD_pyinstaller-Windows.zip from the most recent release. Unzip the emailproxy-YYYY-MM-DD_pyinstaller-Windows.zip file, extracting the contents to the desired location; avoid the protected system folders such as "Program Files", "Program Files (x86)", etc. Right-click each extracted file, go to Properties, and enable "Unblock"..... Write me at traveler(a)mm.st if you want me to post the rest of the instructions. Maybe experienced people don't need them. I havent' tried to install either this or stunnel yet.

1 0