stunnel-users

stunnel-users@stunnel.org

6 participants
3294 discussions

Using stunnel with Brother MFC-8890
by Scott McKeown 08 Jun '12

08 Jun '12

Hi Rolando, Can you please give us a bit more detail. What have you tried doing? How is your network setup? Whats your current STunnel Configuration file settings? Hopefully with this information we should be able to assist. -- With Kind Regards. Scott McKeown Loadbalancer.org http://www.loadbalancer.org

1 0

Using stunnel with Brother MFC-8890
by Rolando Pineda 07 Jun '12

07 Jun '12

Hi, Someone can help me to use stunnel and set up my Brother MFC-8890 to send email through SSL using the stunnel? Thanks in advanced. -- Saludos, _____________ Rolando Pineda

1 0

stunnel - haproxy setup with protocol = proxy
by Scott McKeown 07 Jun '12

07 Jun '12

Hi Robert, I've been doing some work on both HAProxy and STunnel myself over the last month or so. Your actual configuration files both look fine but one thing that you possibly missed is that you will have needed to have build HAProxy with the TProxy flag enabled, and I'm going to guess that you have also written and applied the Firewall rules for the transparent proxy. I've attached a DRAFT pdf of the work that I have been doing, its a very basic how-to on setting up both STunnel and HAProxy in Transparent mode on a Centos 6.2 system. -- With Kind Regards. Scott McKeown Loadbalancer.org http://www.loadbalancer.org

2 4

stunnel - haproxy setup with protocol = proxy
by Robert Garcia 07 Jun '12

07 Jun '12

I am trying to setup stunnel with protocol = proxy through haproxy to my apache2 cluster. I have been using haproxy for a while, and wanted to try this before having to go to nginx, or some other proxy. My config works fine as is if I remove the "accept proxy" from the haproxy.cfg and the protocol=proxy from stunnel config, as soon as those are in, I get a 502 bad gateway. My haproxy.cfg: global log 127.0.0.1 local0 log 127.0.0.1 local1 debug #log loghost local0 info maxconn 50000 #chroot /usr/share/haproxy user haproxy group haproxy daemon #debug #quiet defaults log global mode http option httplog option dontlognull option forwardfor retries 3 option redispatch maxconn 50000 contimeout 5000 clitimeout 60000 srvtimeout 300000 stats uri /haproxy_xxxx stats realm Global\ statistics stats auth xxxxxx:xxxxxxx frontend dev-stg bind *:80 mode http timeout client 5m option forwardfor default_backend dev-www frontend dev-stg-ssl bind *:81 accept-proxy mode http option httpclose option forwardfor timeout client 5m default_backend dev-www backend dev-www mode http timeout connect 10s timeout server 600s balance roundrobin #begin_web_config server ws1 10.0.2.10 maxconn 1000 check port 80 #end_web_config stats uri /haproxy_xxxx stats realm Global\ statistics stats auth xxxxxx:xxxxxxx My stunnel config: ; ***************************************************************************** ; * Global Options * ; ***************************************************************************** ; A copy of some devices and system files is needed within the chroot jail ; Chroot conflicts with configuration file reload and many other features chroot = /var/lib/stunnel4/ ; Chroot jail can be escaped if setuid option is not used setuid = stunnel4 setgid = stunnel4 ; PID is created inside the chroot jail pid = /stunnel4.pid ; Debugging stuff (may useful for troubleshooting) debug = 7 output = /var/log/stunnel4/stunnel.log ; ***************************************************************************** ; * Service Defaults (may also be specified in individual service sections) * ; ***************************************************************************** ; Certificate/key is needed in server mode and optional in client mode cert = /usr/local/certs/server.crt key = /usr/local/certs/server.key ; Disable support for insecure SSLv2 protocol options = NO_SSLv2 ; Workaround for Eudora bug ;options = DONT_INSERT_EMPTY_FRAGMENTS ; The following options provide additional security at some performance penalty ; Default ECDH/DH parameters are strong/conservative, so it is quite safe to ; comment out these lines in order to get a performance boost ;options = SINGLE_ECDH_USE ;options = SINGLE_DH_USE ; ***************************************************************************** ; * Service Definitions (remove all services for inetd mode) * ; ***************************************************************************** ; Example SSL server mode services ; Example SSL front-end to a web server [proxy] accept = 443 connect = 127.0.0.1:81 ; "TIMEOUTclose = 0" is a workaround for a design flaw in Microsoft SSL ; It does not use SSL close-notify alert designed to prevent truncation attacks TIMEOUTclose = 0 protocol = proxy ; vim:ft=dosini And here is the syslog for haproxy and stunner (ip address in log and cfgs are changed to protect the innocent ;-) ) Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG7[1737:140557193127680]: Service [proxy] accepted (FD=3) from 1.2.3.4:35045 Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG7[1737:140557193119488]: Service [proxy] started Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG5[1737:140557193119488]: Service [proxy] accepted connection from 1.2.3.4:35045 Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG6[1737:140557193119488]: connect_blocking: connecting 127.0.0.1:81 Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG7[1737:140557193119488]: connect_blocking: s_poll_wait 127.0.0.1:81: waiting 10 seconds Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG5[1737:140557193119488]: connect_blocking: connected 127.0.0.1:81 Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG5[1737:140557193119488]: Service [proxy] connected remote server from 127.0.0.1:49010 Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG7[1737:140557193119488]: Remote socket (FD=8) initialized Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG6[1737:140557193119488]: Server-mode proxy protocol negotiations started Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG7[1737:140557193119488]: -> PROXY TCP4 1.2.3.4 10.0.2.9 35045 443 Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG6[1737:140557193119488]: Server-mode proxy protocol negotiations succeeded Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG6[1737:140557193119488]: SSL accepted: new session negotiated Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG6[1737:140557193119488]: Negotiated TLSv1/SSLv3 ciphersuite: DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256-bit encryption) Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG6[1737:140557193119488]: Compression: null, expansion: null Jun 7 07:10:50 localhost haproxy[1710]: 1.2.3.4:35045 [07/Jun/2012:07:10:50.496] dev-stg-ssl dev-www/ws1 214/0/1/-1/216 502 754 - - PH-- 0/0/0/0/0 0/0 "GET / HTTP/1.1" Jun 7 07:10:50 localhost haproxy[1710]: 1.2.3.4:35045 [07/Jun/2012:07:10:50.496] dev-stg-ssl dev-www/ws1 214/0/1/-1/216 502 754 - - PH-- 0/0/0/0/0 0/0 "GET / HTTP/1.1" Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG7[1737:140557193119488]: Socket closed on read Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG7[1737:140557193119488]: Sending close_notify alert Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG6[1737:140557193119488]: SSL_shutdown successfully sent close_notify alert Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG3[1737:140557193119488]: transfer: s_poll_wait: TIMEOUTclose exceeded: closing Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG5[1737:140557193119488]: Connection closed: 204 byte(s) sent to SSL, 137 byte(s) sent to socket Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG7[1737:140557193119488]: Remote socket (FD=8) closed Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG7[1737:140557193119488]: Local socket (FD=3) closed Jun 7 07:10:50 ec2-204-236-129-168 stunnel: LOG7[1737:140557193119488]: Service [proxy] finished (0 left) 1.2.3.4 = my external ip I am testing with 10.0.2.9 = haproxy/stunnel server 10.0.2.10 = my apache server Any ideas greatly appreciated. -- Robert Garcia BigHead Technology 15520 Coutolenc Rd Magalia, Ca 95954 ph: 530.645.4040 x222 fax: 530.645.4040 rgarcia(a)bighead.net (mailto:rgarcia@bighead.net) - http://bighead.net/

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] Outlook and stunnel
by James Devine 05 Jun '12

05 Jun '12

I'm using stunnel as a reverse proxy. I have an smtp server smtp1 and an stunnel server proxy1. Clients connect to and negotiate ssl on proxy1 which then connects to smtp1 via a plaintext connection. stunnel does not reside on the client. If I connect the client directly to smtp1 via ssl it works fine. On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Pierre DELAAGE <delaage.pierre(a)free.fr>wrote: > Hmmm if you are using stunnel on client side (as suggested by your > correction) it is that YOU DO NOT WANT TO USE SSL OPTION in OUTLOOK. > > because stunnel will act as an "almost transparent' ssl tunnel. > > So in outlook : uncheck ssl option and give "localhost" as your smtp > server. > > and adapt local port according to your stunnel conf. > > Apart from that : I use stunnel on the server ONLY, with self signed > certificate coming from openssl, > and outlook configured as ssl client is working. > SSLversion = all is always GOOD > > works with stunnel 4.20 on linux mandriva 2008, outlook 2007 > > Pierre > > > > Le 05/06/2012 20:08, James Devine a écrit : > > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:52 AM, James Devine <fxmulder(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am trying to setup stunnel to ssl proxy mail to an smtp server and this >> seems to work fine for thunderbird but when I try using outlook 2010 to >> connect via ssl I get the error: >> >> Send test e-mail message: Your server does not support the connection >> encryption type you have specified. Try changing the encryption method. >> >> For sslVersion I have the option of SSLv3 and TLSv1, all and SSLv2 do >> not seem to work so I'm not sure if that is the problem >> >> Anyone else run in to this or know what I might do to resolve it? >> > > I can get it to work if I setup ssl on the end server directly and bypass > stunnel > > > _______________________________________________ > stunnel-users mailing liststunnel-users@stunnel.orghttp://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users > > >

1 0

Outlook and stunnel
by James Devine 05 Jun '12

05 Jun '12

I am trying to setup stunnel to ssl proxy mail to an smtp server and this seems to work fine for thunderbird but when I try using outlook 2010 to connect via ssl I get the error: Send test e-mail message: Your server does not support the connection encryption type you have specified. Try changing the encryption method. For sslVersion I have the option of SSLv3 and TLSv1, all and SSLv2 do not seem to work so I'm not sure if that is the problem Anyone else run in to this or know what I might do to resolve it?

1 1

stunnel 4.53 released
by Michal Trojnara 03 Jun '12

03 Jun '12

Dear Users, I have released version 4.53 of stunnel. This is major a bugfix release. Upgrade is highly recommended. The ChangeLog entry: Version 4.53, 2012.03.19, urgency: MEDIUM: * New features - Added client-mode "sni" option to directly control the value of TLS Server Name Indication (RFC 3546) extension. - Added support for IP_FREEBIND socket option with a pached Linux kernel. - Glibc-specific dynamic allocation tuning was applied to help unused memory deallocation. - Non-blocking OCSP implementation. * Bugfixes - Compilation fixes for old versions of OpenSSL (tested against 0.9.6). - Usage of uninitialized variables fixed in exec+connect services. - Occasional logging subsystem crash with exec+connect services. - OpenBSD compilation fix (thx to Michele Orru'). - Session id context initialized with session name rather than a constant. - Fixed handling of a rare inetd mode use case, where either stdin or stdout is a socket, but not both of them at the same time. - Fixed missing OPENSSL_Applink http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#PROG2 - Fixed crash on termination with FORK threading model. - Fixed dead canary after configuration reload with open connections. - Fixed missing file descriptors passed to local mode processes. - Fixed required jmp_buf alignment on Itanium platform. - Removed creating /dev/zero in the chroot jail on Solaris platform. - Fixed detection of WSAECONNREFUSED Winsock error. - Missing Microsoft.VC90.CRT.manifest added to Windows installer. Home page: http://www.stunnel.org/ Download: ftp://ftp.stunnel.org/stunnel/ SHA-256 hash for stunnel-4.53.tar.gz: 3e640aa4c96861d10addba758b66e99e7c5aec8697764f2a59ca2268901b8e57 Best regards, Mike

3 2

Re: [stunnel-users] BEAST Attack
by Scott McKeown 31 May '12

31 May '12

Hi Mike, Thank you for your input. I'll rebuild today and retest. Our company openly supports Open Source projects that we use and we will continue to do so. However, since we are still in a R&D position with STunnel at the moment I thought it would be better to continue to use the users group. I'll post again once I've rebuilt and tested, which might not be until the end of next week now as we have an nice extended weekend in the UK for the Golden Jubilee which is nice. ~Yours, Scott -- With Kind Regards. Scott McKeown Loadbalancer.org http://www.loadbalancer.org

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] BEAST Attack
by Scott McKeown 30 May '12

30 May '12

Hi Michal, Thanks for following this up. I'm using the latest build of STunnel v4.53 as shown below (I check the site once a week just to make sure too) # stunnel -version stunnel 4.53 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu platform Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.0.0-fips 29 Mar 2010 Threading:PTHREAD SSL:+ENGINE+OCSP+FIPS Auth:none Sockets:POLL+IPv6 Global options: debug = daemon.notice pid = /usr/local/var/run/stunnel/stunnel.pid RNDbytes = 64 RNDfile = /dev/urandom RNDoverwrite = yes Service-level options: ciphers = FIPS (with "fips = yes") ciphers = ALL:!SSLv2:!aNULL:!EXP:!LOW:-MEDIUM:RC4:+HIGH (with "fips = no") session = 300 seconds sslVersion = TLSv1 (with "fips = yes") sslVersion = TLSv1 for client, all for server (with "fips = no") stack = 65536 bytes TIMEOUTbusy = 300 seconds TIMEOUTclose = 60 seconds TIMEOUTconnect = 10 seconds TIMEOUTidle = 43200 seconds verify = none I've also included a copy of my stunnel.cfg file below: # more /etc/stunnel/stunnel.cfg # STunnel configuration file generated by loadbalancer.org appliance setgid = nobody pid = /stunnel.pid debug = 0 [S1] accept = 192.168.82.182:443 connect = 192.168.82.181:81 cert = /etc/loadbalancer.org/certs/S1.pem ciphers = RC4:HIGH:!MD5:!aNULL options = NO_SSLv2 protocol = proxy I'm looking to include the STunnel Product within our Loadbalancer Appliance in our next upcoming release but with everyone now using the SSL checker that I mentioned in one of my last e-Mails more customers are becoming concerned about MITM Attacks etc. so I would really like to get this solved before I move forward with the project. Oh, I guess I should also mention that this is running on a Centos 6.2 box. ~Yours, Scott

2 1

BEAST Attack
by Scott McKeown 29 May '12

29 May '12

Hi All, Has anyone looked at the current issue with the BEAST Attack. I'm looking at https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/index.html which can be used for testing SSL Certificates I also use Pound Proxy which I have now patched and this has removed the threat. However, I don't seem to be able to get the same result from a STunnel installation. If anyone can give some advice that would be great. ~Yours, Scott

3 5

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

stunnel-users