- stunnel-users - stunnel.org

stunnel 5.64 released
by Michał Trojnara 06 May '22

06 May '22

Dear Users, I have released version 5.64 of stunnel. This release only includes Windows fixes and improvements. ### Version 5.64, 2022.05.06, urgency: MEDIUM * Security bugfixes - OpenSSL DLLs updated to version 3.0.3. * New features - Updated the pkcs11 engine for Windows. * Bugfixes - Removed the SERVICE_INTERACTIVE_PROCESS flag in "stunnel -install". Home page: https://www.stunnel.org/ Download: https://www.stunnel.org/downloads.html SHA-256 hashes: eebe53ed116ba43b2e786762b0c2b91511e7b74857ad4765824e7199e6faf883 stunnel-5.64.tar.gz 600e76b52a86b21f97a1af13734fdd2226c26646bb77f5f9f074ba3d5755f024 stunnel-5.64-win64-installer.exe 391db6166b22a6648fd1f1df584c13ade61c93f620e46b12ebb30b643e61d2d3 stunnel-5.64-android.zip Best regards, Mike

1 0

Handling AUTH LOGIN for SMTP
by reaperunknown＠live.com 22 Apr '22

22 Apr '22

Hello everyone. Perhaps I'm a little new with Stunnel but, I've successfully used it to get an old EarthLink MailStation compatible with GMail SMTP and POP mail. Kind of neat. That said, I wish to use Outlook, but going through the SMTP process manually via Telnet, I've found that the SMTP requires you issue "AUTH LOGIN" command, and give the username and password in Base64. If I do this manually, I can send SMTP mail all day. However, this unit is old enough that I don't think it knows how to do anything with SMTP auth. It also looks like Outlook doesn't turn SMTP auth off for Outlook.com personal accounts. Is there any way that I've missed to have Stunnel handle the AUTH LOGIN part of the SMTP process, so that device that can't, doesn't have to? Thanks!

2 1

Force PSK Authentication
by gerhard＠ats.hacktic.nl 19 Apr '22

19 Apr '22

Hi stunnel-users, Is there a way to force PSK Authentication? Current behavior is that if the client has no PSK Authentication configured, no authentication is performed and the connection proceeds even when the server has this configured: ciphers = PSK PSKsecrets = mypsk.txt Is this expected behavior? Is there a way to enforce PSK, in other words block clients without PSK Authentication? Thanks

2 1

Windows service won't start. ""The Stunnel TLS wrapper service is marked as an interactive service."
by robert.croteau＠quest.com 15 Apr '22

15 Apr '22

Window 10 LTCS (1089): "The Stunnel TLS wrapper service is marked as an interactive service. However, the system is configured to not allow interactive services. This service may not function properly." looks like starting with version 5.61, this above error appears in the System Event log. I've given a quick glance at the changes from 5.60 to 5.61 and there a lot of them. From the release notes, seems that windows services code might have been affected: New features for the Windows platform - Added client mode allowing authenticated users to view logs, reconfigure and terminate running stunnel services. - Added support for multiple GUI and service instances distinguised by the location of stunnel.conf. On GitHub, I also noticed that in the source code for src/ui_win_gui.c the service is created as follows: service=CreateService(scm, SERVICE_NAME, SERVICE_DISPLAY_NAME, SERVICE_ALL_ACCESS, SERVICE_WIN32_OWN_PROCESS|SERVICE_INTERACTIVE_PROCESS, SERVICE_AUTO_START, SERVICE_ERROR_NORMAL, service_path, NULL, NULL, TEXT("TCPIP\0"), NULL, NULL);ui_win_gui.c at around line 1622 the SERVICE_INTERACTIVE_PROCESS flag is set Is this flag necessary? I guess that would be the culprit. my reason to upgrade is because of the CVE-2022-0778 OpenSSL vulnerability anyone has a workaround for this? Microsoft has fully disabled Interactive Service Detection starting with Windows 10 Build 1803 and Windows Server 2016 and 2019. So, it looks like that that Interactive services are no longer allowed and this can't be circumvented by changing some registry setting like it seems it was possible before. thank you

3 5

issue with vendor trying to use proxy for tls
by Daniel Trickett 14 Apr '22

14 Apr '22

Hi stunnelers, We have a supplier which we are attempting punchout to ecommerce site. We use the url http://local-val.dc-clic.com:8899/punchout/request/0fd1ef2b-d09a-441d-b161-… to initiate punchout. The host local-val.dc.clic.com routes to our local host, where stunnel is listening on port 8899. Our config file contains the following below. accept = local-val.dc-clic.com:8899 connect = val.dc-clic.com:443 The application fails to connect and is trying to connect using the incorrect url. Error Code: 202 Supplier Site Does Not Respond Unable to send the Login Request XML. Supplier Login URL: http://local-val.dc-clic.com:8899/punchout/request/0fd1ef2b-d09a-441d-b161-… We use stunnel as tls proxy for various suppliers and have been encountering more issues lately. I am feeling that the long string after the request is causing an issue for stunnel, but unclear to us. Our understanding is stunnel will open the connection to https:// val.dc-clic.com:443/punchout/request/0fd1ef2b-d09a-441d-b161-5ada0e226b80. Stunnel log indicates that a connection is opened to val.dc-clic.com. Any help appreciated! Thanks and best regards Dan This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any other person. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message and any attachment from your system. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its subsidiaries do not accept liability for any omissions or errors in this message which may arise as a result of E-Mail-transmission or for damages resulting from any unauthorized changes of the content of this message and any attachment thereto. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its subsidiaries do not guarantee that this message is free of viruses and does not accept liability for any damages caused by any virus transmitted therewith. Click emdgroup.com/disclaimer<https://www.emdgroup.com/en/legal-disclaimer/mail-disclaimer.html> to access the German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Polish and Slovak versions of this disclaimer. Please find our Privacy Statement information by clicking here: merckgroup.com/privacy-statement-countries<https://www.merckgroup.com/en/privacy-statement/privacy-statement-countries…>

1 0

stunnel log message
by Daniel Trickett 01 Apr '22

01 Apr '22

Hello all, Happy Friday! Hope I can get some clarification on this entry from the stunnel log. The below shows up in our log, our input to stunnel is SSLv3. Is that all this is referring to? TLS state (connect): SSLv3 Thanks for your reply! Best regards, Dan This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any other person. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message and any attachment from your system. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its subsidiaries do not accept liability for any omissions or errors in this message which may arise as a result of E-Mail-transmission or for damages resulting from any unauthorized changes of the content of this message and any attachment thereto. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its subsidiaries do not guarantee that this message is free of viruses and does not accept liability for any damages caused by any virus transmitted therewith. Click emdgroup.com/disclaimer<https://www.emdgroup.com/en/legal-disclaimer/mail-disclaimer.html> to access the German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Polish and Slovak versions of this disclaimer. Please find our Privacy Statement information by clicking here: merckgroup.com/privacy-statement-countries<https://www.merckgroup.com/en/privacy-statement/privacy-statement-countries…>

1 0

Stunnel version 5.63 and openssl 3.0.2 CA signature digest algorithm too weak
by c t browne 30 Mar '22

30 Mar '22

I upgraded to version 5.63 on openssl 3.02 and received a CA signature digest algorithm too week error. I tried setting the securityLevel to 2 and also to 1 and the error did not go away. I have no way to change the certificate on the remove system. Is there an way around this problem? Thanks, Carter

2 2

Can parent proxy see what's going through stunnel
by mingheng wang 28 Mar '22

28 Mar '22

Hi community, I'm using stunnel behind my company proxy like this: protocol=connect connect=proxy.ourcompany.com:3128 protocolHost=myownproxy.net:443 Since I notice that our company seems to be intercepting HTTPS because my web browser sometimes sees our company's certificate instead of the real websites'. So I want to make sure if the company proxy can see what's going through stunnel. Thanks in advance.

1 0

Stunnel aborted the workflow silently in half way
by ygaochn＠amazon.com 25 Mar '22

25 Mar '22

Hey stunnel-users, We are using stunnel as the encryption transit between our NFS client and server. Recently we detected that the stunnel aborted the workflow silently in half way for unknown reason. We'd like to understand what could be the potential reason that cause the issue. Stunnel version: 4.56/5.56, below logs are for 4.56, 5.56 is from customer report without detail log Occurance #1: 2022.03.17 02:19:58 LOG7[1105:139990955783936]: connect_blocking: s_poll_wait IP:PORT: waiting 10 seconds # -> There should be a `TIMEOUTconnect exceeded` failure if the connection failed, but there is no info about how is the waiting going on, there is no log further 2022.03.17 02:56:09 LOG7[1105:139990955789440]: Dispatching signals from the signal pipe Occurance #2: 2022.03.23 16:10:49 LOG6[19003:140551554406144]: CERT: Host name "**" matched with "**" # Aborted again, this is the handshake phase 2022.03.23 16:56:09 LOG7[19003:140551554411648]: Dispatching signals from the signal pipe From the PCAP of the #2 occurance, there is no client side cert and key send to server side, so we can rule out the network issue. 8510 2022-03-23 16:09:47.660910 A B TLSv1.2 5507 Server Hello, Certificate[Packet size limited during capture] 8511 2022-03-23 16:09:47.660919 B A TCP 68 38390 → 2049 [ACK] Seq=340 Ack=5440 Win=57472 Len=0 TSval=698509941 TSecr=1821371384 ... No other client side packet send to server side afterwards, server side are waiting Does anyone encounter this before? I searched the archive but there is no similar issue. What could cause stunnel swallow all the subsequent workflow? Thanks.

1 0

Fix the expansion of @sysconfdir@ in the sample config file
by Peter Pentchev 19 Mar '22

19 Mar '22

Hi, Thanks a lot for writing and maintaining stunnel over the years! What do you think about the attached trivial patch that makes sure @sysconfdir@ is expanded correctly in the sample config file? If something should go wrong with the attachment, it is also available at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/stunnel/-/blob/master/debian/patches/05-sam… Thanks in advance, and keep up the great work! G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev roam(a)ringlet.net roam(a)debian.org pp(a)storpool.com PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13

1 0