- stunnel-users - stunnel.org

stunnel log message
by Daniel Trickett 01 Apr '22

01 Apr '22

Hello all, Happy Friday! Hope I can get some clarification on this entry from the stunnel log. The below shows up in our log, our input to stunnel is SSLv3. Is that all this is referring to? TLS state (connect): SSLv3 Thanks for your reply! Best regards, Dan This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any other person. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message and any attachment from your system. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its subsidiaries do not accept liability for any omissions or errors in this message which may arise as a result of E-Mail-transmission or for damages resulting from any unauthorized changes of the content of this message and any attachment thereto. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and any of its subsidiaries do not guarantee that this message is free of viruses and does not accept liability for any damages caused by any virus transmitted therewith. Click emdgroup.com/disclaimer<https://www.emdgroup.com/en/legal-disclaimer/mail-disclaimer.html> to access the German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Polish and Slovak versions of this disclaimer. Please find our Privacy Statement information by clicking here: merckgroup.com/privacy-statement-countries<https://www.merckgroup.com/en/privacy-statement/privacy-statement-countries…>

1 0

Stunnel version 5.63 and openssl 3.0.2 CA signature digest algorithm too weak
by c t browne 30 Mar '22

30 Mar '22

I upgraded to version 5.63 on openssl 3.02 and received a CA signature digest algorithm too week error. I tried setting the securityLevel to 2 and also to 1 and the error did not go away. I have no way to change the certificate on the remove system. Is there an way around this problem? Thanks, Carter

2 2

Can parent proxy see what's going through stunnel
by mingheng wang 28 Mar '22

28 Mar '22

Hi community, I'm using stunnel behind my company proxy like this: protocol=connect connect=proxy.ourcompany.com:3128 protocolHost=myownproxy.net:443 Since I notice that our company seems to be intercepting HTTPS because my web browser sometimes sees our company's certificate instead of the real websites'. So I want to make sure if the company proxy can see what's going through stunnel. Thanks in advance.

1 0

Stunnel aborted the workflow silently in half way
by ygaochn＠amazon.com 25 Mar '22

25 Mar '22

Hey stunnel-users, We are using stunnel as the encryption transit between our NFS client and server. Recently we detected that the stunnel aborted the workflow silently in half way for unknown reason. We'd like to understand what could be the potential reason that cause the issue. Stunnel version: 4.56/5.56, below logs are for 4.56, 5.56 is from customer report without detail log Occurance #1: 2022.03.17 02:19:58 LOG7[1105:139990955783936]: connect_blocking: s_poll_wait IP:PORT: waiting 10 seconds # -> There should be a `TIMEOUTconnect exceeded` failure if the connection failed, but there is no info about how is the waiting going on, there is no log further 2022.03.17 02:56:09 LOG7[1105:139990955789440]: Dispatching signals from the signal pipe Occurance #2: 2022.03.23 16:10:49 LOG6[19003:140551554406144]: CERT: Host name "**" matched with "**" # Aborted again, this is the handshake phase 2022.03.23 16:56:09 LOG7[19003:140551554411648]: Dispatching signals from the signal pipe From the PCAP of the #2 occurance, there is no client side cert and key send to server side, so we can rule out the network issue. 8510 2022-03-23 16:09:47.660910 A B TLSv1.2 5507 Server Hello, Certificate[Packet size limited during capture] 8511 2022-03-23 16:09:47.660919 B A TCP 68 38390 → 2049 [ACK] Seq=340 Ack=5440 Win=57472 Len=0 TSval=698509941 TSecr=1821371384 ... No other client side packet send to server side afterwards, server side are waiting Does anyone encounter this before? I searched the archive but there is no similar issue. What could cause stunnel swallow all the subsequent workflow? Thanks.

1 0

Fix the expansion of @sysconfdir@ in the sample config file
by Peter Pentchev 19 Mar '22

19 Mar '22

Hi, Thanks a lot for writing and maintaining stunnel over the years! What do you think about the attached trivial patch that makes sure @sysconfdir@ is expanded correctly in the sample config file? If something should go wrong with the attachment, it is also available at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/stunnel/-/blob/master/debian/patches/05-sam… Thanks in advance, and keep up the great work! G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev roam(a)ringlet.net roam(a)debian.org pp(a)storpool.com PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13

1 0

the stunnel stops showing the ssl after a few hours of operation
by Daniel Cordero Gonzalez 18 Mar '22

18 Mar '22

I send an image of the error presented by the stunnel

1 0

the stunnel stops showing the ssl after a few hours of operation
by daniel＠hostingtico.com 18 Mar '22

18 Mar '22

hello, thank you very much for the opportunity to humbly ask for help, I had a server with centos 6 for approximately 3 years and the stunnel never gave me any problem, I recently changed my server with centos 7 but now after a few hours of being active it stops showing the ssl in the ports that I have configured to show shoutcast when viewing the stunnel status: service stunnel status after a few hours it shows most of the result in red and there it does not show the shoutcast in ssl, after giving restart: service stunnel restart everything returns to normal but before 6 hours the problem returns, Could someone give me a light to solve this problem, I'm running the latest version of stunnel my stunnel.conf: client=no [Orto] accept=7000 connect=208.77.20.179:8006 cert = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem sslVersion = TLSv1.2 [radio] accept=7002 connect=208.77.20.179:9942 cert = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem sslVersion = TLSv1.2 [Metro] accept=7004 connect=208.77.20.179:8014 cert = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem sslVersion = TLSv1.2 [arrge] accept=7006 connect=208.77.20.179:8016 cert = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem sslVersion = TLSv1.2 [radio2] accept=7008 connect=208.77.20.179:9932 cert = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem sslVersion = TLSv1.2 [Radiored] accept=7010 connect=208.77.20.179:8023 cert = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem sslVersion = TLSv1.2

1 0

stunnel error message
by Stephen McQuaid 18 Mar '22

18 Mar '22

Hello, I am getting the following error message in stunnel 2022.03.18 14:27:01 LOG3[0]: SSL_read (s_ssl_read_eof): Operation would block (WSAEWOULDBLOCK) (10035) 2022.03.18 14:27:01 LOG5[0]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to TLS, 0 byte(s) sent to socket But when I send a second email immediately after the first one, it goes through ok, does anyone know how to resolve this please?? Regards, Stephen McQuaid Local I.T. Office, Dublin, Ireland Henkel dx - creating the next [Ein Bild, das Schild, Ende, sitzend, Front enth?lt. Automatisch generierte Beschreibung] Office : +353-1-4046338 Mobile: +353-87-2470012 stephen.mcquaid(a)henkel.com<mailto:stephen.mcquaid@henkel.com> www.henkeldx.com<http://www.henkeldx.com/> Have a question visit Digital Business Norden<https://henkelgroup.sharepoint.com/teams/IBSNITInfoPortal/SitePages/IBS-Nor…>

1 0

stunnel 5.63 released
by Michał Trojnara 15 Mar '22

15 Mar '22

Dear Users, I have released version 5.63 of stunnel. ### Version 5.63, 2022.03.15, urgency: HIGH * Security bugfixes - OpenSSL DLLs updated to version 3.0.2. * New features - Updated stunnel.spec to support bash completion. * Bugfixes - Fixed a PRNG initialization crash (thx to Gleydson Soares). Home page: https://www.stunnel.org/ Download: https://www.stunnel.org/downloads.html SHA-256 hashes: c74c4e15144a3ae34b8b890bb31c909207301490bd1e51bfaaa5ffeb0a994617 stunnel-5.63.tar.gz 723f54c28073f17b1ac095a2ab9922735c69f73fba6144a5c68cc160dc673b10 stunnel-5.63-win64-installer.exe c77850c39dfb42f95d26d4f5830a261a95c3785d8c39bdd9f28764ba43ee1d7d stunnel-5.63-android.zip Best regards, Mike

1 0

src/ssl.c:319 - RAND_get_rand_method() may return NULL
by Gleydson Soares 03 Mar '22

03 Mar '22

Hello, The following patch avoids crashess. In src/ssl.c:prng_init(), the RAND_get_rand_method() may return NULL so strict the check to skip PRNG initialization. Diff inline below, against 5.62 gsoares --- ssl.c.orig Thu Mar 3 16:10:39 2022 +++ ssl.c Thu Mar 3 16:13:17 2022 @@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ NOEXPORT int prng_init(GLOBAL_OPTIONS *global) { const RAND_METHOD *meth=RAND_get_rand_method(); /* skip PRNG initialization when no seeding methods are available */ - if(meth->status==NULL || meth->add==NULL) { + if(meth==NULL || meth->status==NULL || meth->add==NULL) { s_log(LOG_DEBUG, "No PRNG seeding methods"); return 0; /* success */ }

1 0