stunnel-users

stunnel-users@stunnel.org

5 participants
3293 discussions

stunnel 4.16 wrapped around an ldap server causing very slow binds
by Mark McCoy 05 Nov '06

05 Nov '06

Hey all, I have an instance of stunnel 4.16 on Solaris 10 that I am trying to use to wrap Sun Directory Server LDAP traffic in SSL. LDAP 'binds' take over 2 minutes to complete using stunnel, but only a split second (as they should) when using an SSH tunnel. I have disabled tcpwrappers per the stunnel FAQ with no results, and tried settting delay = "yes" and "no", with no differences in the results. An interesting thing is that if I try to bind using the wrong password, the "Invalid Credentials" error returns immediately. Using the correct password, the bind hangs for over 2 minutes. Any ideas on what to look for? ------------- Output of stunnel -version: stunnel 4.16 on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 with OpenSSL 0.9.8c 05 Sep 2006 Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Sockets:POLL,IPv4 Global options debug = 5 pid = /usr/local/stunnel/var/run/stunnel/stunnel.pid RNDbytes = 64 RNDfile = /dev/urandom RNDoverwrite = yes Service-level options cert = /usr/local/stunnel/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem ciphers = ALL:!ADH:+RC4:@STRENGTH key = /usr/local/stunnel/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem session = 300 seconds sslVersion = SSLv3 for client, all for server TIMEOUTbusy = 300 seconds TIMEOUTclose = 60 seconds TIMEOUTconnect = 10 seconds TIMEOUTidle = 43200 seconds verify = none -------------- -- Mark McCoy -- Professional Unix geek Here in America we are descended in blood and in spirit from revolutionists and rebels - men and women who dared to dissent from accepted doctrine. As their heirs, may we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower

2 1

newbie sendmail + smtp question
by Fred nietzsche 03 Nov '06

03 Nov '06

My ISP requires all my mail to go to mail.myISP.net via SSL to port 465. I have sendmail compiled with STARTTLS, configured authinfo and I've set up sendmail's smarthost to send everything to mail.myISP.net I run stunnel like this. stunnel /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf -c -d 25 -r mail.myISP.net:465 There are no errors in the log. I can see stunnel listening on 25 with netstat. When I try to send mail I get: bash-3.00# sendmail -v sc00b123(a)yahoo.com <test sc00b123(a)yahoo.com... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay... Which just hangs for ever. My stunnel.conf looks like: cert = /etc/stunnel/mail.pem chroot = /var/stunnel/ setuid = nobody setgid = nogroup pid = /stunnel.pid socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 debug = 7 output = /var/log/stunnel.log [smtp] accept = 25 connect = 465 Thanks for any help, hints, etc.. --------------------------------- Low, Low, Low Rates! Check out Yahoo! Messenger's cheap PC-to-Phone call rates.

1 0

stunnel[2840]: Error binding pop3s to 0.0.0.0:995
by fxper 02 Nov '06

02 Nov '06

I'm trying to use stunnel on a redhat machine to securely check email, via xinetd via pop3d. My /etc/xinetd.d/pop3s looks like this: service pop3s { socket_type = stream wait = no user = root server = /usr/sbin/stunnel log_on_success += USERID log_on_failure += USERID disable = no } And netstat just shows xinetd on 995: netstat -apn|grep 995 tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:995 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 2797/xinetd When I try to check mail with my client hitting port 995, I get this in /var/log/secure using debug level 7: Nov 1 16:17:24 myhostname xinetd[2797]: START: pop3s pid=2840 from=x.x.x.x Nov 1 16:17:54 myhostname stunnel[2840]: stunnel 4.04 on i386-redhat-linux-gnu PTHREAD+LIBWRAP with OpenSSL 0.9.7a Feb 19 2003 Nov 1 16:17:54 myhostname stunnel[2840]: Snagged 64 random bytes from /dev/urandom Nov 1 16:17:54 myhostname stunnel[2840]: RAND_status claims sufficient entropy for the PRNG Nov 1 16:17:54 myhostname stunnel[2840]: PRNG seeded successfully Nov 1 16:17:54 myhostname stunnel[2840]: Certificate: /usr/share/ssl/certs/stunnel.pem Nov 1 16:17:54 myhostname stunnel[2840]: Key file: /usr/share/ssl/certs/stunnel.pem Nov 1 16:17:54 myhostname stunnel[2840]: FD_SETSIZE=1024, file ulimit=1024 -> 500 clients allowed Nov 1 16:17:54 myhostname stunnel[2840]: FD 4 in non-blocking mode Nov 1 16:17:54 myhostname stunnel[2840]: SO_REUSEADDR option set on accept socket Nov 1 16:17:54 myhostname stunnel[2840]: Error binding pop3s to 0.0.0.0:995 Nov 1 16:17:54 myhostname stunnel[2840]: bind: Address already in use (98) Any suggestions? Thanks! --------------------------------- Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.

1 0

How to disable SSLv2
by Tommi Nieminen 30 Oct '06

30 Oct '06

I'm using Stunnel 4.18. I would like to disable SSLv2, but allow SSLv3 and TLSv1. Is this currently possible in Stunnel? I've tried two things so far: first I tried to use the option options = SSL_OP_NO_SSLv2 (from "man SSL_CTX_set_options") It didn't work. This is what I got: 2006.10.27 18:32:48 LOG7[6358:3082897088]: Snagged 64 random bytes from /root/.rnd 2006.10.27 18:32:48 LOG7[6358:3082897088]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to /root/.rnd 2006.10.27 18:32:48 LOG7[6358:3082897088]: RAND_status claims sufficient entropy for the PRNG 2006.10.27 18:32:48 LOG7[6358:3082897088]: PRNG seeded successfully file /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf line 18: Illegal SSL option Nothing gets logged, the above is the response to the startup command. The other thing I tried, though I really didn't expect it to work, was replacing the "options" option with sslVersion = SSLv3 TLSv1 This option seems to accept only one version at a time, or alternatively all of them with "all" on the right hand side, so this failed, stunnel didn't start. Any suggestions? The only thing I can think of is that the SSL option SSL_OP_NO_SSLv2 is something that should have been when configuring the OpenSSL installation, and since I have a readily wrapped package, it has not been included there. In that case I could install OpenSSL from the scratch. But before I try that, I thought I would ask if somebody were already familiar with the problem. Tommi Nieminen --------------------------------------------------- Here is the stunnel config file I was using: CAfile = /etc/stunnel/root-cert.pem cert = /etc/stunnel/device-cert.pem key = /etc/stunnel/device-key.pem output = /var/log/stunnel/stunnel.log pid = /var/run/stunnel/stunnel.pid debug = 7 client = no [https] accept = 443 connect = 192.168.10.17:5010 verify = 1 options = SSL_OP_NO_SSLv2 ;sslVersion = SSLv3 TLSv1

2 2

stunnel patch for extra logging
by Steven Van Acker 29 Oct '06

29 Oct '06

Hi, we use stunnel in server-mode where an SSL enabled client can connect to our stunnel, and then stunnel connects to a non-SSL backend server. The backend server logs incoming connections from stunnel (source IP and port), but stunnel doesn't log the same information. This makes it difficult to match logs between stunnel and the backend. This patch solves exactly this problem. I rewrote the patch so that it can be cleanly applied to any future (and past) version of stunnel. >From the website: "How do I get a patch included into the release versions of Stunnel? Only patches released into the public domain stand a chance of getting into the actual Stunnel source. This means revised BSD patches are likely acceptable. Original BSD and GNU patches are not for example." Since I would like very much that this patch makes it into the next release, I'll release it into the public domain or any other license that makes this possible. kind regards, Steven -- My amazon wishlist: http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/1DB4XNEIEQBPB

2 1

Re: [stunnel-users] Fork Error
by Michal Trojnara 29 Oct '06

29 Oct '06

On Friday 27 October 2006 22:39, John O'Fallon wrote: > I do believe, though, that the problem is due to a change in Stunnel > between version 4.15 and 4.17, since the crash occurs when running > 4.17, but reverting to 4.15 on exactly the same system clears it up. > I have seen this on at least 2 different Mac servers. Please make some tests for me: 1. Try: ./configure --disable-libwrap make clean make make install 2. Check if there are some zombies produced by stunnel. 3. Include your configuration file and the output of "stunnel -version" with your next email. Best regards, Mike

1 0

SMTP & TLS
by Eric B. 27 Oct '06

27 Oct '06

Hi, I've been looking over using stunnel to secure SMTP connections, but am a little confused about how the protocol works. From what I've read, the STARTTLS command is used to allow a client/server to upgrade a connection from plaintext to SSL secured. Further to that, from what I understand, the concept is to allow/use a single port to initiate all connections - ex: port 25. >From what I can tell from stunnel however, is that once stunnel issues the STARTTLS command, if the client doesn't respond in kind, then the connection is terminated. I've tried reading the RFC, but can't seem to find what happens in the case where the client rejects or does not respond to the STARTTLS command. Logicially, I would expect the SMTP connection to continue normally in plaintext. Apparently, this is not how stunnel works. Can someone please help fill in the blanks for me please? What is supposed to happen if the client refuses the STARTTLS request from the server? If the connection is supposed to die, why bother with the STARTTLS request at all, and not just impose the SSL encrypted tunnel from the very beginning (as per the old SSMTP specs)? Thanks, Eric

1 0

Fork Error
by John O'Fallon 27 Oct '06

27 Oct '06

Since upgrading to Stunnel 4.17, I occasionally get the following error: 2006.10.18 23:08:45 LOG3[7007:25232896]: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable (35) 2006.10.18 23:08:45 LOG5[7007:25232896]: Connection reset: 0 bytes sent to SSL, 0 bytes sent to socket The problem doesn't occur right away, but after some number of hits on the server. Reverting to Stunnel 4.15 corrects the problem. This is an OS X 10.4 Mac. I haven't confirmed the problem with 4.18, because the release notes indicate mainly changes relevant to Win32. Has any one else seen the problem? Michal, any thoughts? TIA, John

2 1

Stunnel hangs on big flows of data
by Dario Mariani 27 Oct '06

27 Oct '06

Hi... I'm deploying stunnel on some servers. I did some tests, and i never had problems. For example, i tried 5k parallel connections, and i didn't have any problem. But, i have problems when a small number of connections wants to transfer big chunks of information; the connection hangs. This is a snippet of logs: Server side: 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:1]: oracle11521 accepted FD=226 from 192.168.22.10:39721 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: oracle11521 started 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: FD 226 in non-blocking mode 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: TCP_NODELAY option set on local socket 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG5[20302:200]: oracle11521 connected from 192.168.22.10:39721 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: SSL state (accept): before/ accept initialization 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read client hello A 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write server hello A 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write change cipher spec A 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write finished A 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 flush data 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read finished A 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: 3 items in the session cache 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: 0 client connects (SSL_connect ()) 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: 0 client connects that finished 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: 0 client renegotiations requested 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: 199 server connects (SSL_accept()) 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: 194 server connects that finished 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: 0 server renegotiations requested 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: 173 session cache hits 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: 0 session cache misses 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: 18 session cache timeouts 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG6[20302:200]: SSL accepted: previous session reused 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: FD 227 in non-blocking mode 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: oracle11521 connecting 192.168.22.13:1521 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: connect_wait: waiting 10 seconds 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: connect_wait: connected 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: Remote FD=227 initialized 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:200]: TCP_NODELAY option set on remote socket 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:75]: SSL_read returned WANT_READ: retrying 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:75]: SSL_read returned WANT_READ: retrying 2006.10.20 16:00:58 LOG7[20302:75]: SSL_read returned WANT_READ: retrying client side: 2006.10.20 16:16:01 LOG6[12415:91]: SSL connected: new session negotiated 2006.10.20 16:16:01 LOG6[12415:91]: Negotiated ciphers: DES-CBC3- SHA SSLv3 Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=3DES(168) Mac=SHA1 2006.10.20 16:16:01 LOG7[12415:91]: Socket closed on read 2006.10.20 16:16:01 LOG7[12415:91]: SSL write shutdown 2006.10.20 16:16:01 LOG7[12415:91]: SSL alert (write): warning: close notify 2006.10.20 16:16:01 LOG7[12415:91]: SSL_shutdown retrying 2006.10.20 16:16:01 LOG7[12415:91]: SSL doesn't need to read or write 2006.10.20 16:16:01 LOG7[12415:91]: SSL alert (read): warning: close notify 2006.10.20 16:16:01 LOG7[12415:91]: SSL closed on SSL_read 2006.10.20 16:16:01 LOG7[12415:91]: Socket write shutdown 2006.10.20 16:16:01 LOG5[12415:91]: Connection closed: 3663 bytes sent to SSL, 5239 bytes sent to socket 2006.10.20 16:16:01 LOG7[12415:91]: oracle11521 finished (3 left) The timings are shifted, i don't know if the delta of time is related to a misconfiguration of clock on the machines, or are snippets taken from different events... i don't have direct access to the machines. I tried to make a test (client and server on the same machine) client: nc localhost 10001 >>/dev/null stunnel accept on 10001 and connect to localhost:11521 on the server side: stunnel accept on 11521 and connect on 1521 cat 230megsfile | nc -l -p 1521 & 2>&1 >>/dev/null so, when the nc on client side connects, the server starts the cat. It did complete correctly within a pair of minutes on an ibook 64 1.33 1g ram, but with LOADS of want_read and want_write errors on both sides of stunnel. The server and client are working on "big iron", i mean some superdome hardware with 30-40 cpu on both sides, and with an estimated traffic of 10gig/day And, important... the version of the stunnel instances is 4.15 Can you help me? Bye, dario.

2 4

Fwd: [stunnel-users] Stunnel client not sending data
by Jeremiah Martell 26 Oct '06

26 Oct '06

I forgot to send this to the entire group. My server program was listening on the wrong port. :-) Thanks, - Jeremiah ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jeremiah Martell <inlovewithgod(a)gmail.com> Date: Oct 25, 2006 8:59 AM Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] Stunnel client not sending data To: Carter Browne <cbrowne(a)cbcs-usa.com> HA! Such a simple thing, but yes, that was the problem. I had the wrong port. :-) Thanks, - Jeremiah On 10/25/06, Carter Browne <cbrowne(a)cbcs-usa.com> wrote: > Jeremiah, > > I set the debug level on a stunnel configuration to 7 to understand better where you are failing. You have established > good connection to stunnel, but stunnel cannot get to 127.0.0.1:10000. So is your application listening on > 127.0.0.1:10000? Have you tried running netstat -an to establish that there is a process listening to the port? > > Carter > > Jeremiah Martell wrote: > > Carter, > > > > You're right. That was a typo error on my part. My config says 1.2.3.70. > > > > Anything other ideas? > > > > Thanks, > > - Jeremiah > > > > On 10/25/06, Carter Browne <cbrowne(a)cbcs-usa.com> wrote: > >> On the server side, I think you should be receiving on 1.2.3.70 (since > >> that is where you are sending the data). > >> > >> Carter > >> > >> Jeremiah Martell wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > I have a program that opens up a connection to port 10000 of a server > >> > and sends it some data. It works normally. I'm trying to "stunnel" > >> > both ends. > >> > > >> > In my program I create a socket, connect to local port 7033, send my > >> > data, and close the socket. I verified that every function call > >> > returns success (socket, setsockopt (for TCP_NODELAY), gethostbyname, > >> > connect, and send). > >> > > >> >> From what the logs show below, it seems that server stunnel gets the > >> > connection from the client stunnel, they successfully negotiate the > >> > SSL stuff, then the client stunnel waits for any data to proxy to the > >> > server stunnel. The server stunnel is waiting too, and after 10 > >> > seconds of no data, it closes the socket. > >> > > >> > For some reason the client stunnel is not getting my data and > >> > therefore doesn't forward anything over to the server stunnel. I'm not > >> > sure why this is happening, because my program works normally and I've > >> > verified that everything returned success. > >> > > >> > Any ideas? > >> > > >> > - Jeremiah > >> > > >> > ----------------------------- > >> > > >> > ON CLIENT (1.2.3.60) > >> > > >> > Linux > >> > stunnel 4.16 > >> > OpenSSL 0.9.7c > >> > > >> > stunnel.conf is... > >> > pid = > >> > client = yes > >> > > >> > [7033] > >> > accept = 127.0.0.1:7033 > >> > connect = 1.2.3.70:7033 > >> > > >> > ----------------------------- > >> > > >> > ON SERVER (1.2.3.70) > >> > > >> > Windows > >> > stunnel 4.16 windows binary installer (Aug 31 2006) > >> > > >> > stunnel.conf is... > >> > > >> > cert = stunnel.pem > >> > socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 > >> > socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 > >> > debug = 7 > >> > > >> > [7033] > >> > accept = 1.2.3.60:7033 > >> > connect = 127.0.0.1:10000 > >> > > >> > ----------------------------- > >> > > >> > On client I see this debug... > >> > > >> > Oct 24 14:38:22 stunnel: LOG5[2892:258]: 7033 connected from > >> > 127.0.0.1:10251 > >> > Oct 24 14:38:32 stunnel: LOG3[2892:258]: SSL_read: Connection reset by > >> > peer (104) > >> > Oct 24 14:38:32 stunnel: LOG5[2892:258]: Connection reset: 56 bytes > >> > sent to SSL, 0 bytes send to socket > >> > > >> > ----------------------------- > >> > > >> > On server I see this debug... > >> > > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:08 LOG7[2596:4068]: 7033 accepted FD=196 from > >> > 1.2.3.60:10252 > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:08 LOG7[2596:4068]: Creating a new thread > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:4068]: New thread created > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: 7033 started > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: FD 196 in non-blocking mode > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: TCP_NODELAY option set on local > >> socket > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG5[2596:2372]: 7033 connected from 1.2.3.60:10252 > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: SSL state (accept): before/accept > >> > initialization > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read > >> > client hello A > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write > >> > server hello A > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write > >> > certificate A > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write > >> > server done A > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 flush > >> data > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read > >> > client key exchange A > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 read > >> > finished A > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write > >> > change cipher spec A > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 write > >> > finished A > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: SSL state (accept): SSLv3 flush > >> data > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: 3 items in the session cache > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: 0 client connects > >> (SSL_connect()) > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: 0 client connects that finished > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: 0 client renegotiations > >> requested > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: 5 server connects > >> (SSL_accept()) > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: 5 server connects that finished > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: 0 server renegotiations > >> requested > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: 1 session cache hits > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: 1 session cache misses > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: 1 session cache timeouts > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG6[2596:2372]: SSL accepted: new session > >> negotiated > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG6[2596:2372]: Negotiated ciphers: AES256-SHA > >> > SSLv3 Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=AES(256) Mac=SHA1 > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: FD 180 in non-blocking mode > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: 7033 connecting 127.0.0.1:10000 > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:09 LOG7[2596:2372]: connect_wait: waiting 10 seconds > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:19 LOG6[2596:2372]: connect_wait: s_poll_wait timeout > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:19 LOG5[2596:2372]: Connection reset: 0 bytes sent to > >> > SSL, 0 bytes sent to socket > >> > 2006.10.24 14:43:19 LOG7[2596:2372]: 7033 finished (0 left) > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > stunnel-users mailing list > >> > stunnel-users(a)mirt.net > >> > http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > stunnel-users mailing list > stunnel-users(a)mirt.net > http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users > > > >

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

stunnel-users