Hi,
The difference is that, on WCE, for stunnel code, it is
straigthforward to access the "unique profile" stunnel.conf, WITHOUT
in fact dealing with envvars,
rather than 1/ decode %VARNAME% tokens in conf file and then ask env
for replacement...
well...ok..we can create stubs as well for getenv etc... but is is
much more complicated.
For W32 platforms, communicating with a server with env vars can
open issues.
BUT working in "local user sandbox", folders etc...is more secure
than modifying system files by everyone through envvars.
More generally, I agree that a per user conf can be useful ONLY IF
each user is able, and "directed to" start HIS/HER STUNNEL by HAND,
in a user space process.
But to achieve this....stunnel is ALREADY ready to go by using the
command line like this "stunnel myownconfig.conf", of course having
"my" own copy of stunnel executable.
So there is no real need to have an embeddef feature in stunnel for
conf file customization per user.
And, once again, as conf file are just "text files", it is quite
easy to create a bunch of such from a template, by text editiong
tools : sed on win32 is really powerful, or win32 perl engine, or
whatever scripting language you prefer.
Yours sincerely,
Pierre
Le 31/05/2016 14:24, Dmitry Bakshaev a
écrit :