On 2011-10-11, Michal Trojnara Michal.Trojnara@mirt.net wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:25:04 +0000 (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
It's going to look a ridiculous if I have four instances like that configured and end up with _24_ stunnel processes.
It's even more ridiculous to start four instances of stunnel instead of a single instance with four sections... 8-)
Each instance must start and stop independently, and the program that's starting each instance has no knowlege of the existence of the other instances let alone what the configuration needs to be for them.