I&#39;m sorry, if my previous mail explained the problem differently. <br><br>Stunnel does load balancing when multiple connect statements are specified in a section as in the below mail.<br><br>The scenario is something like <a href="http://mirt.net/pipermail/stunnel-users/2006-May/001139.html">http://mirt.net/pipermail/stunnel-users/2006-May/001139.html</a> and explained below<br>
<br>N servers each running a service of the same service-program (e.g: ip1:2345, ip2:2345, ... ipN:2345)<br>A management server running on a different server (ipM:6789) is required to connect to all or a subset of the above servers through stunnel based on the user request.<br>
<br>I couldn&#39;t find this feature supported by stunnel in the man page.<br><br>I would appreciate if you provide any information on this.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Narendra.<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">

<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA1<br>
<br>
Narendra Prasad Madanapalli wrote:<br>
&gt; connect = ip1:5678,ip2:5678,ip3:5678,...ipn:5678<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Anyone can please let me know the steps to configure the stunnel if<br>
&gt; the support is already in place or provide your thoughts on the new<br>
&gt; support?<br>
<br>
<br>
Use multiple &quot;connect&quot; options within a single section:<br>
connect = ip1:5678<br>
connect = ip2:5678<br>
connect = ip3:5678<br>
...<br>
connect = ipn:5678<br>
<br>
Reading The Fine Manual would answer your question.  It&#39;s not that<br>
hard to read the manual for &quot;connect&quot; before proposing any extensions<br>
for this option.<br></blockquote></div><br><br>Thanks,<br>Narendra.<br>