On 09-08-2011 11:35, Michal Trojnara wrote:
    Gabriel Monnerat wrote:
      
      [varnish_SOFTINST-51]
        
        accept = 10.0.235.44:26012
        
        connect = [2a01:e34:ec03:*:*:*:*:*]:15000
        
      
      [cut]
      
      2011.08.09 00:19:59
        LOG3[12724:140272018409232]: Error resolving
        
        '[2a01:e34:ec03:*:*:*:*:*]': Neither nodename nor servname known
        
        (EAI_NONAME)
        
      
      [cut]
      
      Please, someone can help me? maybe I am
        doing stupid things..
        
      
      
      1. Skip square brackets from IP address.
      
    
    Yes. Thanks
    2. Change "*" to numbers.  8-)
      
    
    :)
    
    Now I have this in log:
    
    
    2011.08.09 11:56:18 LOG5[23690:139807064278800]: Service
    varnish_SOFTINST-51 accepted connection from 10.0.235.44:58876
    
    2011.08.09 11:56:19 LOG5[23690:139807064278800]: connect_blocking:
    connected 2a01:e34:ec03:8610:*:*:*:*:15000
    
    2011.08.09 11:56:19 LOG5[23690:139807064278800]: Service
    varnish_SOFTINST-51 connected remote server from
    2001:0:4137:9e76:0:134:4525:79a7:54770
    
    2011.08.09 11:56:19 LOG5[23690:139807064278800]: Connection closed:
    56 bytes sent to SSL, 460 bytes sent to socket
    
    2011.08.09 11:56:29 LOG5[23690:139807064278800]: Service
    varnish_SOFTINST-51 accepted connection from 10.0.235.44:58888
    
    2011.08.09 11:56:29 LOG5[23690:139807064278800]: connect_blocking:
    connected 2a01:e34:ec03:8610:*:*:*:*:15000
    
    2011.08.09 11:56:29 LOG5[23690:139807064278800]: Service
    varnish_SOFTINST-51 connected remote server from
    2001:0:4137:9e76:0:134:4525:79a7:54782
    
    2011.08.09 11:56:30 LOG5[23690:139807064278800]: Connection closed:
    56 bytes sent to SSL, 460 bytes sent to socket
    
    
    Is this a expected behaviour?
    
    
    If I try access via browser I have this message...
    
    
    Bad Request
      
      
      Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand
    
    
    
    Because in my case, my architecture is:
    
    
    Apache > varnish > stunnel > backend
    
    
    And the varnish have problems to access the stunnel
    
    Thanks.
    
    
      
      Mike
      
      _______________________________________________
      
      stunnel-users mailing list
      
      stunnel-users@stunnel.org
      
      http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
      
    
    
    
    -- 
Gabriel M. Monnerat