3 Feb
2009
3 Feb
'09
12:49 p.m.
Tom Shaw wrote:
Any possibility of getting
X-Forwarded-For
incorporated into the baseline?
I reviewed some patches for this functionality, and they were vulnerable to buffer overflows resulting in remote code execution. They also didn't support keep-alive-mechanism of HTTP/1.1. Some day I'm could add this functionality.
The functionality is on my TODO list, anyway: http://stunnel.mirt.net/?page=todo_sdf
Best regards, Mike