Mike
Thi is probably better idea.
I quickly reviewed TAP/TUN usage and found no significnat disadvantage of using TAP instead of TUN.
Regards
--- "Michal Trojnara" Michal.Trojnara@mobi-com.net ---
Masateru KUWATA wrote:
Just a quick comment - is this designed for only L3 traffic? It is likel that TUNEPIPE encapsulates TUN traffic in TCP and carry to the otehr end through SSL.
If it is a case, can you think about TAP device to be supported as well? I see a lot of demand to carry "Ethernet traffic" over IP rather than L3 traffic. (OpenVPN also supports both)
What about switchint to TAP (L2) completly? Are there any drawbacks of this approach?
Best regards, Mike
stunnel-users mailing list stunnel-users@mirt.net http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
Masateru KUWATA Computer & Communications Consulting