Elodie BOSSIER wrote:
Why you don't implement X-FORWARDED-FOR into stunnel ?
I didn't implement this feature yet, because: 1. It's hard to do it right. 2. I'm the breadwinner for my family. I'm too busy with things I do for a living.
The patch have only 219 lines, could you help me please to addapt it to the version 4.41 and/or add this feature into Stunnel please ?
I'm not going to apply this patch, because: 1. It does not support chains of proxies: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/X-Forwarded- For#Format 2. It does not support HTTP persistent connections (only modifies the first request of each connection): https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/HTTP_persistent_connection 3. The code is ugly. 4. It does not have a GPL-compatible, non-copyleft license.
Thanks so much ...
You're welcome.
Mike