John H Hoffmann wrote:
upgraded to latest sTunnel v 5.36.
In restarting sTunnel I immediately got a 'server down' error
[ ] Service [pop3s] (FD=432) bound to 0.0.0.0:995
[!] bind: Permission denied (WSAEACCES) (10013)
[!] Error binding service [comcast-pop3] to 127.0.0.1:995
You probably have in the stunnel.conf something similar to:
[pop3s] accept=995 {...}
[comcast-pop3] accept=127.0.0.1:995 {...}
accept=995 == 0.0.0.0:995 == (all localhost IPv4 addresses):995
Which includes 127.0.0.1:995
When the [comcast-pop3] service tries to bind to port 995 it fails because it is already bound at the [pop3s] service.
Gishpuppy | To change the delivery settings for this email, click here: http://www.gishpuppy.com/cgi-bin/edit.py?email=gmane.bl4@gishpuppy.com
I agree with This too. Commenting the Comcast stanzas should fix the issue. However, as explained by the user, the config file was working with an older stunnel version (circa 2013). Perhaps that version did not check the error condition...
Regards Jose
El 19/10/2016, a las 1:21 p.m., gmane.bl4@gishpuppy.com escribió:
John H Hoffmann wrote:
upgraded to latest sTunnel v 5.36.
In restarting sTunnel I immediately got a 'server down' error
[ ] Service [pop3s] (FD=432) bound to 0.0.0.0:995
[!] bind: Permission denied (WSAEACCES) (10013)
[!] Error binding service [comcast-pop3] to 127.0.0.1:995
You probably have in the stunnel.conf something similar to:
[pop3s] accept=995 {...}
[comcast-pop3] accept=127.0.0.1:995 {...}
accept=995 == 0.0.0.0:995 == (all localhost IPv4 addresses):995
Which includes 127.0.0.1:995
When the [comcast-pop3] service tries to bind to port 995 it fails because it is already bound at the [pop3s] service.
Gishpuppy | To change the delivery settings for this email, click here: http://www.gishpuppy.com/cgi-bin/edit.py?email=gmane.bl4@gishpuppy.com _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list stunnel-users@stunnel.org https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users