Hello, I use stunnel on FreeBSD 11.1. I install it from ports. Yesterday I updated to stunnel 5.43. However it stopped working. I investigated the problem and found the issue- instead on all network interfaces, "accept" listens on 127.0.0.1 :
sockstat -4 USER COMMAND PID FD PROTO LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS stunnel stunnel 43945 7 tcp4 127.0.0.1:2222 *:* stunnel stunnel 43945 8 tcp4 127.0.0.1:3128 *:* stunnel stunnel 43945 9 tcp4 127.0.0.1:8080 *:* stunnel stunnel 43945 10 tcp4 127.0.0.1:1616 *:*
A workaround is to modify "accept = 0.0.0.0:3128" explicitly to listen on 0.0.0.0. Is this a bug or expected behaviour?
Best regards, Bez Spam
On 14 Nov 2017, at 11:33 pm, Bezspam bezspam@protonmail.com wrote:
Hello, I use stunnel on FreeBSD 11.1. I install it from ports. Yesterday I updated to stunnel 5.43. However it stopped working. I investigated the problem and found the issue- instead on all network interfaces, "accept" listens on 127.0.0.1 :sockstat -4 USER COMMAND PID FD PROTO LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS stunnel stunnel 43945 7 tcp4 127.0.0.1:2222 *:* stunnel stunnel 43945 8 tcp4 127.0.0.1:3128 *:* stunnel stunnel 43945 9 tcp4 127.0.0.1:8080 *:* stunnel stunnel 43945 10 tcp4 127.0.0.1:1616 *:*
A workaround is to modify "accept = 0.0.0.0:3128" explicitly to listen on 0.0.0.0. Is this a bug or expected behaviour? Best regards, Bez Spam
I had the same issue after upgrading to 5.43 - nothing could connect. No information about connections was in the log. It started up OK, but nothing happened.
Didn’t get to investigate it like you did Bez, I had to quickly go to back to version 5.42 to get things working again. Compiled same way, same configuration - only difference was upgraded to version 5.43.
Mac OS X 10.7.5
James.
-
Bezspam -
James Brown