On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:59:16PM +0100, delaage.pierre@free.fr wrote:

Quoting Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>:

You might want to fix your mailer's idea of quoting, since I did not write what you yourself wrote :) You wrote:

For persistent connexion, use ssh tunneling instead of stunnel.

Unless, of course, you are trying to communicate with a third-party product that speaks SSL - if either the client or the server is not under your control, there's no way to make them use multiplexed SSH connections instead of SSL :) But if it's just stunnel on both sides, then yes, SSH tunneling may be a better choice for multiplexing, although it has its own problems - most often related to connection keepalive, especially if there is some kind of firewalling gateway on the path. G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@space.bg roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 Hey, out there - is it *you* reading me, or is it someone else?