-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Dear Users,
I have performed a major rewrite of the stunnel installer for Windows. It now allows installing stunnel for all users (as before), and also for the current user (in the user's home directory). It also no longer installs all the files into a single directory. The installer attempts to automatically migrate the previous layout into the new one. https://www.stunnel.org/downloads/beta/stunnel-5.23b4-installer.exe Please give it a try and let me know your comments and any bugs you can find.
Mike
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 19:11:09 +0200 Michal Trojnara Michal.Trojnara@mirt.net wrote:
Dear Users,
I have performed a major rewrite of the stunnel installer for Windows. It now allows installing stunnel for all users (as before), and also for the current user (in the user's home directory). It also no longer installs all the files into a single directory. The installer attempts to automatically migrate the previous layout into the new one. https://www.stunnel.org/downloads/beta/stunnel-5.23b4-installer.exe Please give it a try and let me know your comments and any bugs you can find.
Mike
Hi, not much feedback, at least publicly to the list ;)
I'll give mine, even it is not the best regarding to the installer itself.
This is becuse since a few versions I extract the files from the installer, as it is not strictly needed to run stunnel, so I can't report anything about the installer itself.
But I liked how the contents now are categorized. That helps a lot to extract instead the old way with all engines and main files mixed.
In the other hand, it's a normal installer, as others out there that give the option for separate profile installs. No problems to run on Windows 2000, at least.
Regards.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 19.08.2015 00:19, Javier wrote:
This is becuse since a few versions I extract the files from the installer, as it is not strictly needed to run stunnel, so I can't report anything about the installer itself.
This is interesting. Which files o you extract? OpenSSL? I guess there are better sources for it.
But I liked how the contents now are categorized. That helps a lot to extract instead the old way with all engines and main files mixed.
I'm glad you like it.
In the other hand, it's a normal installer, as others out there that give the option for separate profile installs. No problems to run on Windows 2000, at least.
My point was to make the installer more like "a normal" one. 8-)
Mike
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 10:09:37 +0200 Michal Trojnara Michal.Trojnara@mirt.net wrote:
On 19.08.2015 00:19, Javier wrote:
This is becuse since a few versions I extract the files from the installer, as it is not strictly needed to run stunnel, so I can't report anything about the installer itself.
This is interesting. Which files o you extract? OpenSSL? I guess there are better sources for it.
stunnel.exe, libeay32.dll, ssleay32.dll, stunnel.html, zlib.dll, tstunnel.exe (I don't use this, but just in case some day... ;-)) VC+ + 9 libraries as don't change, no.
I don't extract OpenSSL.exe, I have a full install for verifications and creation of certificates, check ciphers, ...
Also, this might sound more strange, I modify stunnel.html to add a stylesheet (dark background, light text) to avoid burn my retinas (sorry, full white backgrounds kill my eyes). I could do with browser css but I went the harder way…
That's all if I haven't left anything.
As you said "interesting". Maybe weird.
-
Javier -
Michal Trojnara