[stunnel-users] Problem with huge stunnel.conf
Paul
rfc9001 at gmail.com
Sun Dec 19 11:52:36 CET 2004
> The problem is that Windows only supports 64 file descriptors in a single
> FD_SET structure by default:
As many would need stunnel to run with more than 31 apps (64
descriptor) wouldnt this be an ideal candidate for a configurable
parameter (global options) in stunnel.conf?.
Anyways CIM Massy i did recompile it with a bigger FD_SET and it
worked just fine for me.
Interestingly in Linux, as it implements fd_set with bit mask, i dont
think stunnel will be able to support more than 16 pairs of apps (32
descriptors) unless there is some code change explicitly.
Thanks and Regards,
Paul
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 16:19:43 +0100, Michal Trojnara
<Michal.Trojnara at mobi-com.net> wrote:
> "" <mlk141 at wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> > And it does only work for the first 31 pairs of "services".
> [cut]
> > It does not seem to be a W2K problem since it works with the 64 first
> > services.
>
> The problem is that Windows only supports 64 file descriptors in a single
> FD_SET structure by default:
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/winsock/winsock/maximum_number_of_sockets_supported_2.asp
>
> You can build stunnel with a bigger FD_SET. It's not used by default
> because of increased memory consumption. Please let me know if you need my
> help.
>
> Best regards,
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> stunnel-users mailing list
> stunnel-users at mirt.net
> http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
>
More information about the stunnel-users
mailing list