[stunnel-users] RFC 2487 test in smtp_server not reliable

[Michal Trojnara]

On 2006-08-22, at 10:55, Hans Werner Strube wrote:
> Instead of waiting, a better method would
> be to have a finer timeout resolution than 1 sec in 
> s_poll_wait(...,...);
> setting the timeout to 1 (sec) would be too embarrassing for TLS
> connections. But this would require major changes in the sources.

I'm going to do it the hard way and add another parameter to 
s_poll_wait() function.

IMHO the timeout should be between 100ms and 500ms.  What do you think?

Hans: Once again thank you very much for your help.  You're great!

Best regards,
     Mike