[stunnel-users] tunpipe

[Masateru KUWATA]

Mike

Thi is probably better idea.

I quickly reviewed TAP/TUN usage and found no significnat disadvantage of using TAP instead of TUN.

Regards

--- "Michal Trojnara" <Michal.Trojnara at mobi-com.net> ---

>Masateru KUWATA wrote:
>> Just a quick comment - is this designed for only L3 traffic?
>> It is likel that TUNEPIPE encapsulates TUN traffic in TCP and 
>> carry to the otehr end through SSL.
>> 
>> If it is a case, can you think about TAP device to be 
>> supported as well? I see a lot of demand to carry "Ethernet 
>> traffic" over IP rather than L3 traffic. (OpenVPN also supports both)
>
>What about switchint to TAP (L2) completly?  Are there any drawbacks of this
>approach?
>
>Best regards,
>    Mike
>
>_______________________________________________
>stunnel-users mailing list
>stunnel-users at mirt.net
>http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users


Masateru KUWATA
Computer & Communications Consulting