[stunnel-users] Stunnel v4.25 vs v4.20
James Moe
jimoe at sohnen-moe.com
Mon Jun 30 21:12:12 CEST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 06/26/08 11:33 am, James Moe wrote:
> Hello,
> I upgraded to v4.25 and stunnel aborts right away. v4.20 works just fine.
>
> 2008.06.26 11:31:01 LOG3[282:8553]: Error binding pop3.sma.com_L110-R995
> to 127.0.0.1:110
> 2008.06.26 11:31:01 LOG3[282:8553]: bind: Address family not supported by
> protocol family (47)
>
Ah! "47" is a standard C library error code.
In <stunnel.c> bind() fails in 4.25 where it succeeded in 4.20. Is there
some problem with the text "pop3.sma.com_L110-R995"?
Except for replacing "exit(1)" with "die(1)" I see no difference in the
code in <stunnel.c> between the two versions. So why does v4.25 fail?
- --
jimoe (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (OS/2)
iD8DBQFIaTAMzTcr8Prq0ZMRAqrPAJ9E9+7DMYr8tCL0OQqfJFiHOS6TUQCgixYK
PhGw9GN/OV8aiQfPCUqgxzY=
=kcyv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the stunnel-users
mailing list