[stunnel-users] doubts with stunnel.conf
Gabriel Monnerat
gabrielmonnerat at gmail.com
Tue Aug 9 17:40:21 CEST 2011
On 09-08-2011 12:38, Gabriel Monnerat wrote:
> Now I have this in log:
>
> 2011.08.09 11:56:18 LOG5[23690:139807064278800]: Service
> varnish_SOFTINST-51 accepted connection from 10.0.235.44:58876
> 2011.08.09 11:56:19 LOG5[23690:139807064278800]: connect_blocking:
> connected 2a01:e34:ec03:8610:*:*:*:*:15000
> 2011.08.09 11:56:19 LOG5[23690:139807064278800]: Service
> varnish_SOFTINST-51 connected remote server from
> 2001:0:4137:9e76:0:134:4525:79a7:54770
> 2011.08.09 11:56:19 LOG5[23690:139807064278800]: Connection closed: 56
> bytes sent to SSL, 460 bytes sent to socket
> 2011.08.09 11:56:29 LOG5[23690:139807064278800]: Service
> varnish_SOFTINST-51 accepted connection from 10.0.235.44:58888
> 2011.08.09 11:56:29 LOG5[23690:139807064278800]: connect_blocking:
> connected 2a01:e34:ec03:8610:*:*:*:*:15000
> 2011.08.09 11:56:29 LOG5[23690:139807064278800]: Service
> varnish_SOFTINST-51 connected remote server from
> 2001:0:4137:9e76:0:134:4525:79a7:54782
> 2011.08.09 11:56:30 LOG5[23690:139807064278800]: Connection closed: 56
> bytes sent to SSL, 460 bytes sent to socket
>
> Is this a expected behaviour?
>
> If I try access via browser I have this message...
>
> /Bad Request
>
> Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand /
>
> Because in my case, my architecture is:
>
> Apache > varnish > stunnel > backend
>
> And the varnish have problems to access the stunnel
This problem was fixed adding this parameters to stunnel.conf:
sslVersion = SSLv3
socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1
socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1
--
Gabriel M. Monnerat
More information about the stunnel-users
mailing list