[stunnel-users] Temporary failure in name resolution, (Michal Trojnara)

[Michal Trojnara]

Phil Wieland wrote:
> Can I be really cheeky and ask one more question?
> Why does the problem not go away when my resolver is available -  
> Shouldn't stunnel look again for this stuff after getting a  
> temporary error?

Stunnel first tries to resolve addresses while reading configuration  
file (before chroot), and than if the initial attempt failed, stunnel  
makes another attempt while opening each connection (after chroot).   
The latter method failed, because you didn't have resolver  
configuration files within your chroot directory.

Mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.stunnel.org/pipermail/stunnel-users/attachments/20110508/8ea0fd81/attachment.sig>