[stunnel-users] Stunnel 4.53 for win32 - without config file

Brian Wilkins bwilkins at gmail.com
Thu Jun 14 21:56:37 CEST 2012


So why not autogenerate it ? What does a key have to do with configurations
? Just use stunnel for your purpose, scrub, and then regenerate every time.
Or point the configuration to an encrypted volume ? I am confused.

Brian



On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Steve Marvin <smarvin at pobox.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 20:40:12 +0200, Pierre DELAAGE wrote:
>
> >putting config file in a folder properly protected by permissions set is
> >the best way to do that.
> >I always wonder why some people want to use stunnel without leaving any
> >trace on their (?) server machine:
> >many of those are just trying to open backdoors on systems...
>
> >"security reasons"...hmm...just bad excuse.
>
>
> Some people have a requirement not to have the private key in an
> unencrypted file on disk. At least my project does.
>
> -----------------
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> stunnel-users mailing list
> stunnel-users at stunnel.org
> http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.stunnel.org/pipermail/stunnel-users/attachments/20120614/3352314b/attachment.html>


More information about the stunnel-users mailing list