[stunnel-users] Stunnel->Stunnel Failure Behavior...

[Michal Trojnara]

Matt Wise wrote:
> Any thoughts on this? I'm still trying to figure out the behavior by  
> reading the source code, but I'm not a big C programmer.. :/
>>> Feb 22 21:41:24 staging-i-123.xxx stunnel: LOG3[10717:3073788784]:  
>>> connect_blocking: getsockopt 123.123.123.123:2182: Connection  
>>> refused (111)
>>> Feb 22 21:41:25 staging-i-123.xxx stunnel: LOG3[10717:3073788784]:  
>>> connect_blocking: getsockopt 123.123.123.123:2182: Connection  
>>> refused (111)
>>> Feb 22 21:41:25 staging-i-123.xxx stunnel: LOG3[10717:3073788784]:  
>>> connect_blocking: getsockopt 123.123.123.123:2182: Connection  
>>> refused (111)

I tried really hard, but I couldn't reproduce your issue in my lab.   
For me it works as it was supposed to do.

Please include the output of "stunnel - version".  Maybe there is  
something specific with your OS or configuration.

Mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.stunnel.org/pipermail/stunnel-users/attachments/20120313/428d365d/attachment.sig>