[stunnel-users] TIMEOUTclose exceeded: closing

[Brian Wilkins]

What happens if you remove TIMEOUTclose and accept the default?

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Michael Wittig <michael.wittig at cinovo.de>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am using stunnes 4.54, my config looks like this:
>
> chroot = /opt/stunnel/jail/
> setuid = stunnel
> setgid = stunnel
> pid = /stunnel.pid
> socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1
> socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1
> syslog = yes
> debug = local1.warning
> fips = no
>
> [http]
> cert = /opt/stunnel/www.crt
> key = /opt/stunnel/www.key
> sslVersion = all
> options = NO_SSLv2
> renegotiation = no
> accept  = 192.168.72.10:443
> connect = 192.168.71.10:80
> TIMEOUTclose = 0
> xforwardedfor = yes
>
> My log is full with:
>
> Oct 25 14:49:33 www stunnel: LOG3[15114:140668359968512]: transfer:
> s_poll_wait: TIMEOUTclose exceeded: closing
> Oct 25 14:49:36 www stunnel: LOG3[15114:140668360591104]: transfer:
> s_poll_wait: TIMEOUTclose exceeded: closing
> Oct 25 14:50:08 www stunnel: LOG3[15114:140668360812288]: transfer:
> s_poll_wait: TIMEOUTclose exceeded: closing
> Oct 25 14:50:13 www stunnel: LOG3[15114:140668360591104]: transfer:
> s_poll_wait: TIMEOUTclose exceeded: closing
>
>
> The doc suggests to "set to 0 for buggy MSIE" the mailing list tells me "You
> requested close timeout of 0 seconds and that's exactly what you get."
> But i still don't understand why this is an error and what can I do to get
> rid of it? Or is it okay to don't look for errors in the log?
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> stunnel-users mailing list
> stunnel-users at stunnel.org
> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.stunnel.org/pipermail/stunnel-users/attachments/20121025/35d15307/attachment.html>