[stunnel-users] limited number of ports

[Brian Wilkins]

Yes, you can. I currently do it.
On Apr 5, 2013 12:19 PM, "Javier" <meresponde2001-stn at yahoo.es> wrote:

> On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 12:52:09 -0400
> Brian Wilkins <bwilkins at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It is possible to setup stunnel as separate services. I don't
> > know if this would be a suitable workaround for you.
>
> Hi,
>
> Since, I can't recall the version (edit: probably since 4.16 as
> Michal stated in the link below), it is not possible to run more
> than one instance of stunnel. You can just create service level
> configurations in the conf file and nothing else. (Previously I,
> myself, had 2 conf files for client and server too)
>
> If there are only allowed 64 services (and therefore ports), I
> think it might be considered as a new feature to add or as a bug.
>
> I never need such ammount of services, but could be interesting to
> fix and allow more. I wouldn't say 65535 minus 1028 but a few more
> ;-)
>
> Regards.
>
> https://www.stunnel.org/pipermail/stunnel-users/2011-August/003178.html
> _______________________________________________
> stunnel-users mailing list
> stunnel-users at stunnel.org
> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.stunnel.org/pipermail/stunnel-users/attachments/20130405/a6e67a91/attachment.html>