[stunnel-users] Session is active but I cannot connect

Carter Browne cbcs at comcast.net
Thu Apr 9 17:04:34 CEST 2015


In your before setting, your client should have  been to connect to your 
test server:

[jdbc]
client = yes
accept = 127.0.0.1:2404
connect=my_server_name:2404

In your after setting, the accept and connect ports cannot be the same port.



On 4/9/2015 10:51 AM, daninho dj wrote:
> Hi Jose,
>
> Thanks for mail. The problem is that when I change the accept port on 
> the server, stunnel doesn't start:
>
> *Before:*
>
> _Server:_
>
> [test]
> accept = 2404
> connect = 2406
>
> _Client:_
>
> [jdbc]
> client = yes
> accept = 127.0.0.1:2404 <http://127.0.0.1:2404>
> connect = /my_server_name/:2406
>
> *After:*
>
> I edited the stunnel.conf on the server:
>
> [test]
> accept = 2406
> connect = 2406
>
> Then trying to start the service:
>
> */etc/init.d/stunnel start*
> *Starting stunnel (SSL tunnel) startproc:  exit status of parent of 
> /usr/sbin/stunnel: 1*
> *  please see /var/log/rc.stunnel.log for details failed*
>
> /var/log/rc.stunnel.log is empty but in the log specified in the 
> stunnel.conf I have the following:
>
> tail -10 /var/log/stunnel/stunnel.log
> 2015.04.09 16:42:36 LOG5[22524:139805264570112]: Threading:PTHREAD 
> SSL:ENGINE Sockets:POLL,IPv6 Auth:LIBWRAP
> 2015.04.09 16:42:36 LOG6[22524:139805264570112]: file ulimit = 262144 
> (can be changed with 'ulimit -n')
> 2015.04.09 16:42:36 LOG6[22524:139805264570112]: poll() used - no 
> FD_SETSIZE limit for file descriptors
> 2015.04.09 16:42:36 LOG5[22524:139805264570112]: 128000 clients allowed
> 2015.04.09 16:42:36 LOG7[22524:139805264570112]: FD 10 in non-blocking 
> mode
> 2015.04.09 16:42:36 LOG7[22524:139805264570112]: FD 11 in non-blocking 
> mode
> 2015.04.09 16:42:36 LOG7[22524:139805264570112]: FD 12 in non-blocking 
> mode
> 2015.04.09 16:42:36 LOG7[22524:139805264570112]: SO_REUSEADDR option 
> set on accept socket
> 2015.04.09 16:42:36 LOG3[22524:139805264570112]: Error binding test to 
> 0.0.0.0:2406 <http://0.0.0.0:2406>
> 2015.04.09 16:42:36 LOG3[22524:139805264570112]: bind: Address already 
> in use (98)
>
>
> Same thing happens when I try to change the ports on the client. Any 
> idea how this problem can be solved?
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Daninho
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 4:12 PM, <josealf at rocketmail.com 
> <mailto:josealf at rocketmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     The accept port on the server Config must be the same as the
>     connect port on the client config.
>     The connect port on the server must be the port used by the
>     application/service you try to secure, usually bound to the
>     loopback interfase, as you probably don't want to allow unsecure
>     connections.
>     On the client the accept port is the port your client application
>     will connect to.
>
>     Hope this helps to clarify a bit.
>
>     Regards
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: daninho dj <daninho.dj at gmail.com <mailto:daninho.dj at gmail.com>>
>     Sender: "stunnel-users" <stunnel-users-bounces at stunnel.org
>     <mailto:stunnel-users-bounces at stunnel.org>>
>     Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 14:28:25
>     To: <stunnel-users at stunnel.org <mailto:stunnel-users at stunnel.org>>
>     Subject: [stunnel-users] Session is active but I cannot connect
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     stunnel-users mailing list
>     stunnel-users at stunnel.org <mailto:stunnel-users at stunnel.org>
>     https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> daninho <http://daninhodj.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> stunnel-users mailing list
> stunnel-users at stunnel.org
> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

-- 
Carter Browne
cbrowne at cbcs-usa.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.stunnel.org/pipermail/stunnel-users/attachments/20150409/053f80d2/attachment.html>


More information about the stunnel-users mailing list