[stunnel-users] Session is active but I cannot connect
Carter Browne
cbcs at comcast.net
Thu Apr 9 17:04:34 CEST 2015
In your before setting, your client should have been to connect to your
test server:
[jdbc]
client = yes
accept = 127.0.0.1:2404
connect=my_server_name:2404
In your after setting, the accept and connect ports cannot be the same port.
On 4/9/2015 10:51 AM, daninho dj wrote:
> Hi Jose,
>
> Thanks for mail. The problem is that when I change the accept port on
> the server, stunnel doesn't start:
>
> *Before:*
>
> _Server:_
>
> [test]
> accept = 2404
> connect = 2406
>
> _Client:_
>
> [jdbc]
> client = yes
> accept = 127.0.0.1:2404 <http://127.0.0.1:2404>
> connect = /my_server_name/:2406
>
> *After:*
>
> I edited the stunnel.conf on the server:
>
> [test]
> accept = 2406
> connect = 2406
>
> Then trying to start the service:
>
> */etc/init.d/stunnel start*
> *Starting stunnel (SSL tunnel) startproc: exit status of parent of
> /usr/sbin/stunnel: 1*
> * please see /var/log/rc.stunnel.log for details failed*
>
> /var/log/rc.stunnel.log is empty but in the log specified in the
> stunnel.conf I have the following:
>
> tail -10 /var/log/stunnel/stunnel.log
> 2015.04.09 16:42:36 LOG5[22524:139805264570112]: Threading:PTHREAD
> SSL:ENGINE Sockets:POLL,IPv6 Auth:LIBWRAP
> 2015.04.09 16:42:36 LOG6[22524:139805264570112]: file ulimit = 262144
> (can be changed with 'ulimit -n')
> 2015.04.09 16:42:36 LOG6[22524:139805264570112]: poll() used - no
> FD_SETSIZE limit for file descriptors
> 2015.04.09 16:42:36 LOG5[22524:139805264570112]: 128000 clients allowed
> 2015.04.09 16:42:36 LOG7[22524:139805264570112]: FD 10 in non-blocking
> mode
> 2015.04.09 16:42:36 LOG7[22524:139805264570112]: FD 11 in non-blocking
> mode
> 2015.04.09 16:42:36 LOG7[22524:139805264570112]: FD 12 in non-blocking
> mode
> 2015.04.09 16:42:36 LOG7[22524:139805264570112]: SO_REUSEADDR option
> set on accept socket
> 2015.04.09 16:42:36 LOG3[22524:139805264570112]: Error binding test to
> 0.0.0.0:2406 <http://0.0.0.0:2406>
> 2015.04.09 16:42:36 LOG3[22524:139805264570112]: bind: Address already
> in use (98)
>
>
> Same thing happens when I try to change the ports on the client. Any
> idea how this problem can be solved?
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Daninho
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 4:12 PM, <josealf at rocketmail.com
> <mailto:josealf at rocketmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> The accept port on the server Config must be the same as the
> connect port on the client config.
> The connect port on the server must be the port used by the
> application/service you try to secure, usually bound to the
> loopback interfase, as you probably don't want to allow unsecure
> connections.
> On the client the accept port is the port your client application
> will connect to.
>
> Hope this helps to clarify a bit.
>
> Regards
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: daninho dj <daninho.dj at gmail.com <mailto:daninho.dj at gmail.com>>
> Sender: "stunnel-users" <stunnel-users-bounces at stunnel.org
> <mailto:stunnel-users-bounces at stunnel.org>>
> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 14:28:25
> To: <stunnel-users at stunnel.org <mailto:stunnel-users at stunnel.org>>
> Subject: [stunnel-users] Session is active but I cannot connect
>
> _______________________________________________
> stunnel-users mailing list
> stunnel-users at stunnel.org <mailto:stunnel-users at stunnel.org>
> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
>
>
>
>
> --
> daninho <http://daninhodj.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> stunnel-users mailing list
> stunnel-users at stunnel.org
> https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
--
Carter Browne
cbrowne at cbcs-usa.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.stunnel.org/pipermail/stunnel-users/attachments/20150409/053f80d2/attachment.html>
More information about the stunnel-users
mailing list