[stunnel-users] Possible signal handling bug in fork mode
Philippe Anctil
philippe.anctil at gmail.com
Tue Feb 16 17:45:39 CET 2016
Hi,
In fork mode, sending a sigterm signal to a child is caught by the parent.
I suspect it has something to do with signal_pipe being shared by the child
and parent after the fork.
Here I sent a signal to the parent while a child process was also running.
The parent shut down as expected. After sending sigterm, the child remains.
Processes before sigterm:
UID PID PPID C STIME TTY STAT TIME CMD
user 1423 1 0 10:32 ? Ss 0:00
/usr/local/stunnel/bin/stunnel.bin /usr/local/stunnel/etc/server.conf
user 1921 1423 0 10:37 ? S 0:00 \_
/usr/local/stunnel/bin/stunnel.bin /usr/local/stunnel/etc/server.conf
selected pid 1423
Processes after:
UID PID PPID C STIME TTY STAT TIME CMD
user 1921 1 0 10:37 ? S 0:00
/usr/local/stunnel/bin/stunnel.bin /usr/local/stunnel/etc/server.conf
Here I sent the signal to the child. The parent shut down and the child
completed normally.
Processes before:
UID PID PPID C STIME TTY STAT TIME CMD
user 1276 1 0 10:31 ? Ss 0:00
/usr/local/stunnel/bin/stunnel.bin /usr/local/stunnel/etc/server.conf
user 1309 1276 0 10:31 ? S 0:00 \_
/usr/local/stunnel/bin/stunnel.bin /usr/local/stunnel/etc/server.conf
selected pid 1309
Processes after:
UID PID PPID C STIME TTY STAT TIME CMD
user 1309 1 0 10:31 ? S 0:00
/usr/local/stunnel/bin/stunnel.bin /usr/local/stunnel/etc/server.conf
I know I should be trying threads. I will eventually. I can only switch
once I validate it can sustain our level of traffic. Fork has done that
flawlessly for many years now.
Best regards,
--
Philippe Anctil
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.stunnel.org/pipermail/stunnel-users/attachments/20160216/87be77c8/attachment.html>
More information about the stunnel-users
mailing list