[stunnel-users] segfault with v5.55

[Mark Brookes]

> Do you think I should also compile it with the latest OpenSSL 1.1.1d ?
Yes, you can do that.

Our issue specifically related to 1.1.0k Its interesting you have seen
a similar/the same issue with 1.1.1c.
By all means try it against 1.1.1d. I think we would all be very
interested to see if you have a similar/same issue when building
against 1.1.1d.


On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 at 10:29, Francois Robinette <frobinette at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Mark!
>
> I will try it... For the record, I compiled stunnel against OpenSSL 1.1.1c
>
> Do you think I should also compile it with the latest OpenSSL 1.1.1d ?
>
> Thanks again!
> ________________________________
> From: Mark Brookes <mark at loadbalancer.org>
> Sent: November 8, 2019 3:47 AM
> To: Francois Robinette <frobinette at hotmail.com>
> Cc: stunnel-users at stunnel.org <stunnel-users at stunnel.org>
> Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] segfault with v5.55
>
> The stunnel guys have worked tirelessly to get this resolved. Its an
> interaction of openssl 1.1.0k and Stunnel. I think essentially openssl
> is doing something strange. They came up with a fix and its currently
> in the https://www.stunnel.org/downloads/beta/stunnel-5.56b1.tar.gz
> beta. You should give it a try and see if its resolves your issue.
>
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 19:36, Francois Robinette <frobinette at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I've seen other having the same issue without resolution so far...
> > But we do have the same issue:
> >
> > stunnel[7886]: segfault at 21 ip 00007f70aa1efcea sp 00007f6fa7797978 error 6 in libpthread-2.12.so[7f70aa1e5000+17000]
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > stunnel-users mailing list
> > stunnel-users at stunnel.org
> > https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users
>
>
>
> --
>
> Mark Brookes
> Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
> www.loadbalancer.org
>
>
> +44 (0)330 380 1064
> mark at loadbalancer.org



--

Mark Brookes
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
www.loadbalancer.org


+44 (0)330 380 1064
mark at loadbalancer.org