stunnel-users

stunnel-users@stunnel.org

5 participants
3293 discussions

RE: stunnel and OpenSSL v0.9.8 - tunneling the UDP. Possible?
by rz1a＠mail.ru 20 Aug '05

20 Aug '05

Hello Michal, OK. Securing a plain UDP will suffice at first! Are there any plans to use DTLS? Thank you in advance. -- Best regards, Tony

1 0

stunnel and OpenSSL v0.9.8 - tunneling the UDP. Possible?
by rz1a＠mail.ru 19 Aug '05

19 Aug '05

Hello stunnel-users, OpenSSL from v0.9.8 onwards (I'm told) supports a thing called DTLS. On the OpenSSL's list I was told that it's the tool one needs to use for UDP tunneling. Are there any plans to use this OpenSSL's functionality in the stunnel? I need to securely tunnel the UDP traffic, namely multicasted datagramms. -- Best regards, Tony.

2 1

stunnel on windows
by Paul Cottingham 19 Aug '05

19 Aug '05

Folks, I'm in need of some help in setting up stunnel on windows, I get either Error reading certificate file: {path}/stunnel.pem {path}/stunnel.pem: No such process (3) So I am assuming the second error {path}/stunnel.pem: No such process (3) the path statement is correct and therefore something else is not correct but I have no idea where and what Regards Paul

1 0

Stunnel HTTPS Client Issue
by Salar Madadi 19 Aug '05

19 Aug '05

Hello, We are having a problem with our application using STUNNEL and are stuck. I have detailed the issue below with more detailed info about our setup. I am not very familiar with the SSL protocol so I am having trouble identifying the differences between the log samples I posted to determine what the issue may be. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Salar Madadi - Latest Developments Inc. Problem Description ************************************ We are using Stunnel to provide an HTTPS client for use with the UPS ShipXML service. Our application is an xBase++ 1.82 service using the XB2.NET library, running on a windows 2003 server. The application opens a connection to stunnel, which then connects to the UPS https server to send and retrieve an xml response with shipping data. UPS made a change to their service last week related to load balancing and our application has not worked since then. When we send an XML document to UPS we receive the exact same XML document back as if it has been bounced instead of the proper response. Our setup was working until they made the change and they have no idea what is going on. Stunnel Version ***************************************** The problem initially happened with stunnel v. 4.05 and openSSL v. 0.9.7c. I have also tried it with stunnel v. 4.11 and openSSL v. 0.9.7f and the same result occurs. Stunnel.conf settings *********************************** #Stunnel server configuration file key=stunnel.pem #up this number to 7 to get full log details #leave it at 3 to just get critical error messages debug=7 output=test.log client=yes verify=0 [psuedo-https] accept = 8080 connect = www.ups.com:443 TIMEOUTclose = 0 Stunnel log samples ************************************** Here are some log samples. The first is a log sample of when it was working. The second is one when it stopped working and the third is from when it was still not working using the latest version of stunnel/openssl. LOG 1 - Working 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:2796]: psuedo-https accepted FD=216 from 127.0.0.1:3349 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:2796]: FD 216 in non-blocking mode 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:2796]: Creating a new thread 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:2796]: New thread created 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: psuedo-https started 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG5[184:1840]: psuedo-https connected from 127.0.0.1:3349 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: FD 208 in non-blocking mode 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: psuedo-https connecting 153.2.228.50:443 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: remote connect #1: EWOULDBLOCK: retrying 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: waitforsocket: FD=208, DIR=write 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: waitforsocket: ok 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: Remote FD=208 initialized 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: SSL state (connect): before/connect initialization 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write client hello A 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: waitforsocket: FD=208, DIR=read 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: waitforsocket: ok 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server hello A 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG5[184:1840]: VERIFY IGNORE: depth=1, /C=US/O=RSA Data Security, Inc./OU=Secure Server Certification Authority 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG5[184:1840]: VERIFY IGNORE: depth=1, /C=US/O=RSA Data Security, Inc./OU=Secure Server Certification Authority 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG5[184:1840]: VERIFY IGNORE: depth=0, /C=US/ST=New Jersey/L=Mahwah/O=United Parcel Service/OU=Internet Systems/CN=www.ups.com 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server certificate A 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server done A 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write client key exchange A 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write change cipher spec A 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write finished A 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 flush data 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: waitforsocket: FD=208, DIR=read 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: waitforsocket: ok 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read finished A 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: 3 items in the session cache 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: 3 client connects (SSL_connect()) 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: 3 client connects that finished 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: 0 client renegotiatations requested 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: 0 server connects (SSL_accept()) 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: 0 server connects that finished 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: 0 server renegotiatiations requested 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: 0 session cache hits 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: 0 session cache misses 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG7[184:1840]: 0 session cache timeouts 2005.05.24 23:37:39 LOG6[184:1840]: Negotiated ciphers: RC4-SHA SSLv3 Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=RC4(128) Mac=SHA1 2005.05.24 23:37:40 LOG7[184:1840]: SSL alert (read): warning: close notify 2005.05.24 23:37:40 LOG7[184:1840]: SSL closed on SSL_read 2005.05.24 23:37:40 LOG7[184:1840]: SSL write shutdown (output buffer empty) 2005.05.24 23:37:40 LOG7[184:1840]: Socket write shutdown (output buffer empty) 2005.05.24 23:37:40 LOG7[184:1840]: SSL alert (write): warning: close notify 2005.05.24 23:37:40 LOG6[184:1840]: SSL_shutdown successfully sent close_notify 2005.05.24 23:37:40 LOG7[184:1840]: Socket closed on read 2005.05.24 23:37:40 LOG5[184:1840]: Connection closed: 726 bytes sent to SSL, 648 bytes sent to socket 2005.05.24 23:37:40 LOG7[184:1840]: psuedo-https finished (0 left) LOG 2 - NOT WORKING 2005.08.15 15:46:07 LOG7[2636:3432]: psuedo-https accepted FD=180 from 127.0.0.1:3141 2005.08.15 15:46:07 LOG7[2636:3432]: FD 180 in non-blocking mode 2005.08.15 15:46:07 LOG7[2636:3432]: Creating a new thread 2005.08.15 15:46:07 LOG7[2636:3432]: New thread created 2005.08.15 15:46:07 LOG7[2636:1316]: psuedo-https started 2005.08.15 15:46:07 LOG5[2636:1316]: psuedo-https connected from 127.0.0.1:3141 2005.08.15 15:46:07 LOG7[2636:1316]: FD 172 in non-blocking mode 2005.08.15 15:46:07 LOG7[2636:1316]: psuedo-https connecting 65.171.127.243:443 2005.08.15 15:46:07 LOG7[2636:1316]: remote connect #1: EWOULDBLOCK: retrying 2005.08.15 15:46:07 LOG7[2636:1316]: waitforsocket: FD=172, DIR=write 2005.08.15 15:46:07 LOG7[2636:1316]: waitforsocket: ok 2005.08.15 15:46:07 LOG7[2636:1316]: remote connect #2: EINVAL: ok 2005.08.15 15:46:07 LOG7[2636:1316]: Remote FD=172 initialized 2005.08.15 15:46:07 LOG7[2636:1316]: SSL state (connect): before/connect initialization 2005.08.15 15:46:07 LOG7[2636:1316]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write client hello A 2005.08.15 15:46:07 LOG7[2636:1316]: waitforsocket: FD=172, DIR=read 2005.08.15 15:46:12 LOG7[2636:1316]: waitforsocket: ok 2005.08.15 15:46:12 LOG7[2636:1316]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read server hello A 2005.08.15 15:46:12 LOG7[2636:1316]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 read finished A 2005.08.15 15:46:12 LOG7[2636:1316]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write change cipher spec A 2005.08.15 15:46:12 LOG7[2636:1316]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write finished A 2005.08.15 15:46:12 LOG7[2636:1316]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 flush data 2005.08.15 15:46:12 LOG7[2636:1316]: 17 items in the session cache 2005.08.15 15:46:12 LOG7[2636:1316]: 230 client connects (SSL_connect()) 2005.08.15 15:46:12 LOG7[2636:1316]: 230 client connects that finished 2005.08.15 15:46:12 LOG7[2636:1316]: 0 client renegotiatations requested 2005.08.15 15:46:12 LOG7[2636:1316]: 0 server connects (SSL_accept()) 2005.08.15 15:46:12 LOG7[2636:1316]: 0 server connects that finished 2005.08.15 15:46:12 LOG7[2636:1316]: 0 server renegotiatiations requested 2005.08.15 15:46:12 LOG7[2636:1316]: 213 session cache hits 2005.08.15 15:46:12 LOG7[2636:1316]: 0 session cache misses 2005.08.15 15:46:12 LOG7[2636:1316]: 0 session cache timeouts 2005.08.15 15:46:12 LOG6[2636:1316]: Negotiated ciphers: AES256-SHA SSLv3 Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=AES(256) Mac=SHA1 2005.08.15 15:46:14 LOG7[2636:1316]: SSL_read returned WANT_: retrying 2005.08.15 15:46:14 LOG7[2636:1316]: SSL_read returned WANT_: retrying 2005.08.15 15:46:14 LOG7[2636:1316]: SSL alert (read): warning: close notify 2005.08.15 15:46:14 LOG7[2636:1316]: SSL closed on SSL_read 2005.08.15 15:46:14 LOG7[2636:1316]: SSL write shutdown (output buffer empty) 2005.08.15 15:46:14 LOG7[2636:1316]: Socket write shutdown (output buffer empty) 2005.08.15 15:46:14 LOG7[2636:1316]: SSL alert (write): warning: close notify 2005.08.15 15:46:14 LOG6[2636:1316]: SSL_shutdown successfully sent close_notify 2005.08.15 15:46:14 LOG5[2636:1316]: Connection closed: 738 bytes sent to SSL, 5754 bytes sent to socket 2005.08.15 15:46:14 LOG7[2636:1316]: psuedo-https finished (0 left) LOG 3 - NOT WORKING WITH LATEST VERSION OF STUNNEL/OPENSSL 2005.08.18 20:45:13 LOG7[2212:3324]: psuedo-https accepted FD=164 from 127.0.0.1:1076 2005.08.18 20:45:13 LOG7[2212:3324]: Creating a new thread 2005.08.18 20:45:13 LOG7[2212:3324]: New thread created 2005.08.18 20:45:13 LOG7[2212:3388]: psuedo-https started 2005.08.18 20:45:13 LOG7[2212:3388]: FD 164 in non-blocking mode 2005.08.18 20:45:13 LOG5[2212:3388]: psuedo-https connected from 127.0.0.1:1076 2005.08.18 20:45:13 LOG7[2212:3388]: FD 188 in non-blocking mode 2005.08.18 20:45:13 LOG7[2212:3388]: psuedo-https connecting 153.2.228.50:443 2005.08.18 20:45:13 LOG7[2212:3388]: connect_wait: waiting 10 seconds 2005.08.18 20:45:13 LOG7[2212:3388]: connect_wait: connected 2005.08.18 20:45:13 LOG7[2212:3388]: Remote FD=188 initialized 2005.08.18 20:45:16 LOG5[2212:3388]: VERIFY IGNORE: depth=1, /C=US/O=RSA Data Security, Inc./OU=Secure Server Certification Authority 2005.08.18 20:45:16 LOG5[2212:3388]: VERIFY IGNORE: depth=1, /C=US/O=RSA Data Security, Inc./OU=Secure Server Certification Authority 2005.08.18 20:45:16 LOG5[2212:3388]: VERIFY IGNORE: depth=0, /C=US/ST=New Jersey/L=Mahwah/O=United Parcel Service/OU=Internet System/OU=Terms of use at www.verisign.com/rpa (c)05/CN=www.ups.com 2005.08.18 20:45:17 LOG6[2212:3388]: SSL connected: new session negotiated 2005.08.18 20:45:17 LOG6[2212:3388]: Negotiated ciphers: RC4-SHA SSLv3 Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=RC4(128) Mac=SHA1 2005.08.18 20:45:20 LOG7[2212:3388]: SSL_read returned WANT_READ: retrying 2005.08.18 20:45:20 LOG7[2212:3388]: SSL_read returned WANT_READ: retrying 2005.08.18 20:45:20 LOG7[2212:3388]: SSL closed on SSL_read 2005.08.18 20:45:20 LOG7[2212:3388]: Socket write shutdown 2005.08.18 20:45:20 LOG7[2212:3388]: SSL write shutdown 2005.08.18 20:45:20 LOG6[2212:3388]: SSL_shutdown successfully sent close_notify 2005.08.18 20:45:20 LOG5[2212:3388]: Connection closed: 738 bytes sent to SSL, 8248 bytes sent to socket 2005.08.18 20:45:20 LOG7[2212:3388]: psuedo-https finished (0 left) Output of stunnel.exe -version ************************************* stunnel 4.11 on x86-pc-mingw32-gnu WIN32+IPv6 with OpenSSL 0.9.7f 22 Mar 2005 Global options cert = stunnel.pem ciphers = ALL:!ADH:+RC4:@STRENGTH debug = 5 key = stunnel.pem RNDbytes = 64 RNDoverwrite = yes service = stunnel session = 300 seconds taskbar = yes verify = none Service-level options TIMEOUTbusy = 300 seconds TIMEOUTclose = 60 seconds TIMEOUTconnect = 10 seconds TIMEOUTidle = 43200 seconds 2005.08.18 21:06:04 LOG3[2508:3100]: Server is down

2 1

Win32 Local Privilege Escalation when Stunnel installed as a System service
by Ian 18 Aug '05

18 Aug '05

Hi, There is a trivial to exploit Local Privilege Escalation when stunnel is installed as a system service on windows. Who should I inform of this so a fix can be made? Thanks Ian --

5 4

stunnel Bug Tracking System
by Michal Trojnara 10 Aug '05

10 Aug '05

Dear Users, I've installed a Bug Tracking System for stunnel. You can enter bugs and feature requests here: http://stunnel.mirt.net/flyspray/ Best regards, Mike

1 0

stunnel for postgresql in windows
by babu 10 Aug '05

10 Aug '05

Hi all, I have seen stunnel example for mysql. how to use stunnel for postgresql in windows.. Thanks babu --------------------------------- To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre.

2 2

nonblocking: Operation not supported by this device (19)
by Tuc＠T-B-O-H 09 Aug '05

09 Aug '05

Hi, This morning I stopped using the splash screen on boot on my FreeBSD 4.11 system, using stunnel 4.11 and now when I use stunnel I get: "stunnel[PID]: nonblocking: Operation not supported by device (19)" Why would changing if I use a splash screen or not make this difference?! Thanks, Tuc

1 0

Any examples of Stunnel usage in "enterprise environments"?
by Claus Lund 06 Aug '05

06 Aug '05

Hi everybody, I was just wondering if there are any public examples of widespread Stunnel usage in an enterprise environments? I'm a UNIX admin where I work and we are currently working on trying to find a solution for encrypting all network traffic to and from the UNIX machines (all the clients are using Windows boxes). We are running a variety of services on the boxes including Samba, homegrown services for our 3-tier app, Oracle, DB2 etc... I already have proof of concept setups for every network service that we offer but I think some "real-world examples" would go a long to convince my boss (and the Windows admins) that Stunnel is a viable option for us. Thank you in advance, Claus

2 1

Re: [stunnel-users] Stunnel dumping core
by Andrew Gay 05 Aug '05

05 Aug '05

> Envelope-to: gay@localhost > Delivery-date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 16:49:55 +0100 Michael Tronjara wrote: > Politeness is required on this list. *plonk* > > Mike Michael, might I suggest your understanding of that word differs from the majority of us on this list. Many times people have written in pointing out problems with stunnel crashing, dumping core, locking up, yet all you can offer is 'never report problems with older versions', 'you have no right to complain', etc etc, and now you have the arrogance to tell us all we have no clue how to report bugs. I get the feeling you are upset because so many of us discover problems with this software. Andrew

4 6

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

stunnel-users