- stunnel-users - stunnel.org

Re: [stunnel-users] stunnel 5.38 released
by Javier 26 Nov '16

26 Nov '16

Hi there. Dumb error I just found. Dumb because I just found it and maybe it was earlier among us. Or maybe it is "a feature". But I'd swear it worked as expected in the past. Testing the new SNI option I made a mistake and I had to edit and reload the configuration file. Nothing strange until here. The problem is comming because I load a custom .conf file as "stunnel.exe file.conf" for the server mode, so when a parsing error is found, Stunnel lose the track of the custom .conf file and when you reload the corrected configuration through the "Reload configuration" menu option, it doesn't load the custom .conf but the default stunnel.conf. But before reloading, the "Edit configuration" menu option points correctly to the correct configuration file and opens it to edit. Only "Reload configuration" lose the track of the file. This is happening in the windows environment (just if it wasn't clear enough by the .exe extension ;) ). Windows 2000 (yet). I can't tested versions beyond. Regards.

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] Help in setting stunnel in server mode to over come TLSV2 compatibility
by Jose Alf. 25 Nov '16

25 Nov '16

Jothish, 1. You are using a very outdated version of OpenSSL (openssl 0.9.8 is EOL). I suggest you use a newer, supported version. 2. On a DOS Window, try this:openssl dhparam -rand randfile1;randfile2;randfile3 1024 where randfile1,randfile2.... are existing files or directories to use as entrophy sources. If you're on Linux you can use dd if=/dev/urandom count=2 | openssl dhparam -rand - 1024 This will print something like this:WARNING: can't open config file: c:\openssl-vc/ssl/openssl.cnf Loading 'screen' into random state - done 0 semi-random bytes loaded Generating DH parameters, 1024 bit long safe prime, generator 2 This is going to take a long time ..+.. bla, bla....++* unable to write 'random state' -----BEGIN DH PARAMETERS----- MIGHAoGBAJJ+QAYkKQd0pG1lxZKDYVZaURkTINQho8CWCUYOMp2ZEwZeMrEv+kjd PVb4Ilnah1TmZQOxu1v8HtSWmKpclhlTDKjmDbhznUFkQhmRGjxXDCfrhnvNI4hV kOB/3lGcWo50ttf+ZqNaXd0lKf9YfnjkRUSUtrHiMRL9CdecxQXbAgEC -----END DH PARAMETERS----- Now, cut from ---BEGIN... all the way to PARAMETERS--- and add it to your cert PEM file. 3. Try again, your check command: openssl dhparam -inform PEM -in ./training_client.pem -check -textShould print something like: DH Parameters: (1024 bit) prime: 00:92:7e:40:06:24:29:07:74:a4:6d:65:c5:92:83: ... 31:12:fd:09:d7:9c:c5:05:db generator: 2 (0x2) DH parameters appear to be ok. -----BEGIN DH PARAMETERS----- MIGHAoGBAJJ+QAYkKQd0pG1lxZKDYVZaURkTINQho8CWCUYOMp2ZEwZeMrEv+kjd ....-----END DH PARAMETERS----- 4. Now, try connecting from SFDC to tibco and let us know. SaludosJose From: "jothish.chokkalingam(a)accenture.com" <jothish.chokkalingam(a)accenture.com> To: josealf(a)rocketmail.com Cc: cbrowne(a)cbcs-usa.com; stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 6:45 AM Subject: RE: [stunnel-users] Help in setting stunnel in server mode to over come TLSV2 compatibility #yiv9373448809 #yiv9373448809 -- _filtered #yiv9373448809 {font-family:Wingdings;panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;} _filtered #yiv9373448809 {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv9373448809 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv9373448809 {font-family:Consolas;panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}#yiv9373448809 #yiv9373448809 p.yiv9373448809MsoNormal, #yiv9373448809 li.yiv9373448809MsoNormal, #yiv9373448809 div.yiv9373448809MsoNormal {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;color:black;}#yiv9373448809 a:link, #yiv9373448809 span.yiv9373448809MsoHyperlink {color:#0563C1;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv9373448809 a:visited, #yiv9373448809 span.yiv9373448809MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:#954F72;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv9373448809 p {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:11.0pt;color:black;}#yiv9373448809 pre {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:10.0pt;color:black;}#yiv9373448809 p.yiv9373448809MsoListParagraph, #yiv9373448809 li.yiv9373448809MsoListParagraph, #yiv9373448809 div.yiv9373448809MsoListParagraph {margin-top:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:.5in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;color:black;}#yiv9373448809 span.yiv9373448809HTMLPreformattedChar {font-family:Consolas;color:black;}#yiv9373448809 span.yiv9373448809EmailStyle20 {color:windowtext;}#yiv9373448809 span.yiv9373448809EmailStyle21 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv9373448809 span.yiv9373448809EmailStyle22 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv9373448809 span.yiv9373448809EmailStyle23 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv9373448809 .yiv9373448809MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered #yiv9373448809 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv9373448809 div.yiv9373448809WordSection1 {}#yiv9373448809 _filtered #yiv9373448809 {} _filtered #yiv9373448809 {} _filtered #yiv9373448809 {} _filtered #yiv9373448809 {} _filtered #yiv9373448809 {} _filtered #yiv9373448809 {} _filtered #yiv9373448809 {} _filtered #yiv9373448809 {} _filtered #yiv9373448809 {} _filtered #yiv9373448809 {}#yiv9373448809 ol {margin-bottom:0in;}#yiv9373448809 ul {margin-bottom:0in;}#yiv9373448809 Jose, For the issue as mentioned in below down mail I am following below two approaches, 1. Move the TLSv1.2 enabled traffic to an intermediate port and then to target port which has TLS1 enabled, in that ssl handshake from intermediate to target port getting below error. While triaging with openssl command, it is observed that the DH parameters are not proper. So we are trying to add the dh parameters C:\Users\robin.johnson\Documents\SSL\SSL>C:\openssl-0.9.8k_X64\bin\openssl dhparam -inform PEM -in ./training_client.pem -check -text unable to load DH parameters 1800:error:0906D06C:PEM routines:PEM_read_bio:no start line:.\crypto\pem\pem_lib.c:650:Expecting: DH PARAMETERS stunnel.logà2016.11.23 23:08:32 LOG3[131]: SSL_connect: 14082174: error:14082174:SSL routines:ssl3_check_cert_and_algorithm:dh key too small 2. Using https service in stunnel traffic is received by TLS V1.1 divert to non ssl enabled port. Thanks and Regards, Jothish TIBCO TSD Ph. : +91 44 39263958 Mobile : +91 9884040171 Support : +91 9962007110 OC : jothish.chokkalingam Group mail:- Telstra.psm.tsd.tibco(a)accenture.com From: Josealf.rm [mailto:josealf@rocketmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 4:36 PM To: Chokkalingam, Jothish <jothish.chokkalingam(a)accenture.com> Cc: cbrowne(a)cbcs-usa.com; stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] Help in setting stunnel in server mode to over come TLSV2 compatibility Can you please elaborate? If you want us to help, you need to provide enough information. Regards Jose El 24/11/2016, a las 5:03 a.m., <jothish.chokkalingam(a)accenture.com> <jothish.chokkalingam(a)accenture.com> escribió: Jose, J you are right.i was trying but I thought it will work as a client and it worked as a workaround. But will check for the dh key small error while forwarding the traffic with SSL from intermediate port to another port. Thanks and Regards, Jothish TIBCO TSD Ph. : +91 44 39263958 Mobile : +91 9884040171 Support : +91 9962007110 OC : jothish.chokkalingam Group mail:- Telstra.psm.tsd.tibco(a)accenture.com From: Josealf.rm [mailto:josealf@rocketmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 2:48 PM To: Chokkalingam, Jothish <jothish.chokkalingam(a)accenture.com> Cc: cbrowne(a)cbcs-usa.com; stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] Help in setting stunnel in server mode to over come TLSV2 compatibility Jothish, Stunnel in server mode is what you need, with 99.9% confidence. When you write: [https] Accept=443 Connect=local host:80 Client=no Stunnnel will expect TLS connections on port 443 and will forward then to your normal web server running on loopback port 80. Is that clear? Regards, Jose El 24/11/2016, a las 2:29 a.m., <jothish.chokkalingam(a)accenture.com> <jothish.chokkalingam(a)accenture.com> escribió: Is there a way to forward a Secure connection from one port to non secure port using stunnel. I am googling but unable to find. If you have can you let me know Thanks and Regards, Jothish TIBCO TSD Ph. : +91 44 39263958 Mobile : +91 9884040171 Support : +91 9962007110 OC : jothish.chokkalingam Group mail:- Telstra.psm.tsd.tibco(a)accenture.com From: stunnel-users [mailto:stunnel-users-bounces@stunnel.org]On Behalf Of Carter Browne Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 9:30 PM To: stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] Help in setting stunnel in server mode to over come TLSV2 compatibility There are other tools for performing port forwarding with less overhead (I believe tappipe is one), although I make use stunnel to do this extensively. In order forward a secure connection from one port to another is a two step process with stunnel: A sample configuration segment would be: [SFDC reverse in] client = no accept = 8008 connect = localhost:48008 [SFDC reverse out] client = yes accept = localhost:48008 connect = localhost:8009 On 11/23/2016 10:18 AM, Rodney Lott wrote: Hi, there. I'm no stunnel expert, but here's my $0.05 (we have no pennies in Canada anymore ;-) ): - I would try including the key as well as the cert in your stunnel config - I would enable debug on the openssl s_client call to see if it will indicate why it is reseting. Same with your SFDC client to get more info. - Question: is the "WARNING: can't open config file" message below indicative of a permissions or path problem? - Question: Is the stunnel cert and key compatible with the TIBCO server's certificate? They need to be using certs generated from the same key source, don't they? - You might want to fix the SSL version in the stunnel config file (i.e. sslVersion = TLSv1.2) Good luck with your debugging. Rodney On 2016-11-22 07:43 PM, jothish.chokkalingam(a)accenture.com wrote: HI all, There is a problem we have currently connecting tibco client to SFDC sever via TLS v1.2 and that’s solved by using stunnel in client mode. And the communication from SFDC client to tibco server applications w.r.t TLS V1.2 I am unable to solve using stunnel. Below is the configuration in stunnel in server end to divert the traffic from 8008 to 8009, can you help here with the logs is the stunnel configuration is correct or there any missed/need to alter. [SFDC reverse proxy test] debug=7 ;client = yes accept = 8008àport used by sfdc client to connect to TIBCO server connect = localhost:8009 àTibco server that’s running cert = stunnel.pem 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG7[118]: Service [SFDC reverse proxy test] started 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG7[118]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG5[118]: Service [SFDC reverse proxy test] accepted connection from 101.167.198.14:54477 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG6[118]: Peer certificate not required 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG7[118]: SSL state (accept): before/accept initialization 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG3[118]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG5[118]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to SSL, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG7[118]: Local descriptor (FD=696) closed 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG7[118]: Service [SFDC reverse proxy test] finished (0 left) PFB the openssl snap shot looks odd C:\Program Files (x86)\stunnel\bin>openssl s_client -connect localhost:8008 -prexit -showcerts WARNING: can't open config file: /devel/win32/openssl/openssl.cnf CONNECTED(0000016C) Thanks and Regards, Jothish TIBCO TSD Ph. : +91 44 39263958 Mobile : +91 9884040171 Support : +91 9962007110 OC : jothish.chokkalingam Group mail:- Telstra.psm.tsd.tibco(a)accenture.com This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned by our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment of internal compliance with Accenture policy. ______________________________________________________________________________________ www.accenture.com _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users _______________________________________________ stunnel-users mailing list stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] Help in setting stunnel in server mode to over come TLSV2 compatibility
by Josealf.rm 24 Nov '16

24 Nov '16

Can you please elaborate? If you want us to help, you need to provide enough information. Regards Jose > El 24/11/2016, a las 5:03 a.m., <jothish.chokkalingam(a)accenture.com> <jothish.chokkalingam(a)accenture.com> escribió: > > Jose, > J you are right.i was trying but I thought it will work as a client and it worked as a workaround. But will check for the dh key small error while forwarding the traffic with SSL from intermediate port to another port. > > Thanks and Regards, > Jothish > TIBCO TSD > Ph. : +91 44 39263958 > Mobile : +91 9884040171 > Support : +91 9962007110 > OC : jothish.chokkalingam > Group mail:- Telstra.psm.tsd.tibco(a)accenture.com > > From: Josealf.rm [mailto:josealf@rocketmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 2:48 PM > To: Chokkalingam, Jothish <jothish.chokkalingam(a)accenture.com> > Cc: cbrowne(a)cbcs-usa.com; stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org > Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] Help in setting stunnel in server mode to over come TLSV2 compatibility > > Jothish, > > Stunnel in server mode is what you need, with 99.9% confidence. > > When you write: > > [https] > Accept=443 > Connect=local host:80 > Client=no > > Stunnnel will expect TLS connections on port 443 and will forward then to your normal web server running on loopback port 80. > > Is that clear? > > Regards, > Jose > > El 24/11/2016, a las 2:29 a.m., <jothish.chokkalingam(a)accenture.com> <jothish.chokkalingam(a)accenture.com> escribió: > > > Is there a way to forward a Secure connection from one port to non secure port using stunnel. I am googling but unable to find. If you have can you let me know > > Thanks and Regards, > Jothish > TIBCO TSD > Ph. : +91 44 39263958 > Mobile : +91 9884040171 > Support : +91 9962007110 > OC : jothish.chokkalingam > Group mail:- Telstra.psm.tsd.tibco(a)accenture.com > > From: stunnel-users [mailto:stunnel-users-bounces@stunnel.org] On Behalf Of Carter Browne > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 9:30 PM > To: stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org > Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] Help in setting stunnel in server mode to over come TLSV2 compatibility > > There are other tools for performing port forwarding with less overhead (I believe tappipe is one), although I make use stunnel to do this extensively. > > In order forward a secure connection from one port to another is a two step process with stunnel: > > A sample configuration segment would be: > > [SFDC reverse in] > > client = no > > accept = 8008 > > connect = localhost:48008 > > > [SFDC reverse out] > client = yes > accept = localhost:48008 > connect = localhost:8009 > > On 11/23/2016 10:18 AM, Rodney Lott wrote: > Hi, there. > > I'm no stunnel expert, but here's my $0.05 (we have no pennies in Canada anymore ;-) ): > - I would try including the key as well as the cert in your stunnel config > - I would enable debug on the openssl s_client call to see if it will indicate why it is reseting. Same with your SFDC client to get more info. > - Question: is the "WARNING: can't open config file" message below indicative of a permissions or path problem? > - Question: Is the stunnel cert and key compatible with the TIBCO server's certificate? They need to be using certs generated from the same key source, don't they? > - You might want to fix the SSL version in the stunnel config file (i.e. sslVersion = TLSv1.2) > > Good luck with your debugging. > > Rodney > > On 2016-11-22 07:43 PM, jothish.chokkalingam(a)accenture.com wrote: > HI all, > > There is a problem we have currently connecting tibco client to SFDC sever via TLS v1.2 and that’s solved by using stunnel in client mode. And the communication from SFDC client to tibco server applications w.r.t TLS V1.2 I am unable to solve using stunnel. Below is the configuration in stunnel in server end to divert the traffic from 8008 to 8009, can you help here with the logs is the stunnel configuration is correct or there any missed/need to alter. > > [SFDC reverse proxy test] > debug=7 > ;client = yes > accept = 8008àport used by sfdc client to connect to TIBCO server > connect = localhost:8009 àTibco server that’s running > cert = stunnel.pem > 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG7[118]: Service [SFDC reverse proxy test] started > 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG7[118]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket > 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG5[118]: Service [SFDC reverse proxy test] accepted connection from 101.167.198.14:54477 > 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG6[118]: Peer certificate not required > 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG7[118]: SSL state (accept): before/accept initialization > 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG3[118]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected > 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG5[118]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to SSL, 0 byte(s) sent to socket > 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG7[118]: Local descriptor (FD=696) closed > 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG7[118]: Service [SFDC reverse proxy test] finished (0 left) > > PFB the openssl snap shot looks odd > C:\Program Files (x86)\stunnel\bin>openssl s_client -connect localhost:8008 -prexit -showcerts > WARNING: can't open config file: /devel/win32/openssl/openssl.cnf > CONNECTED(0000016C) > > Thanks and Regards, > Jothish > TIBCO TSD > Ph. : +91 44 39263958 > Mobile : +91 9884040171 > Support : +91 9962007110 > OC : jothish.chokkalingam > Group mail:- Telstra.psm.tsd.tibco(a)accenture.com > > > > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned by our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment of internal compliance with Accenture policy. > ______________________________________________________________________________________ > > www.accenture.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > stunnel-users mailing list > stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org > https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > stunnel-users mailing list > stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org > https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users > > _______________________________________________ > stunnel-users mailing list > stunnel-users(a)stunnel.org > https://www.stunnel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users

1 0

Help in setting stunnel in server mode to over come TLSV2 compatibility
by jothish.chokkalingam＠accenture.com 24 Nov '16

24 Nov '16

HI all, There is a problem we have currently connecting tibco client to SFDC sever via TLS v1.2 and that's solved by using stunnel in client mode. And the communication from SFDC client to tibco server applications w.r.t TLS V1.2 I am unable to solve using stunnel. Below is the configuration in stunnel in server end to divert the traffic from 8008 to 8009, can you help here with the logs is the stunnel configuration is correct or there any missed/need to alter. [SFDC reverse proxy test] debug=7 ;client = yes accept = 8008-->port used by sfdc client to connect to TIBCO server connect = localhost:8009 -->Tibco server that's running cert = stunnel.pem 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG7[118]: Service [SFDC reverse proxy test] started 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG7[118]: Option TCP_NODELAY set on local socket 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG5[118]: Service [SFDC reverse proxy test] accepted connection from 101.167.198.14:54477 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG6[118]: Peer certificate not required 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG7[118]: SSL state (accept): before/accept initialization 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG3[118]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG5[118]: Connection reset: 0 byte(s) sent to SSL, 0 byte(s) sent to socket 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG7[118]: Local descriptor (FD=696) closed 2016.11.23 08:31:56 LOG7[118]: Service [SFDC reverse proxy test] finished (0 left) PFB the openssl snap shot looks odd C:\Program Files (x86)\stunnel\bin>openssl s_client -connect localhost:8008 -prexit -showcerts WARNING: can't open config file: /devel/win32/openssl/openssl.cnf CONNECTED(0000016C) Thanks and Regards, Jothish TIBCO TSD Ph. : +91 44 39263958 Mobile : +91 9884040171 Support : +91 9962007110 OC : jothish.chokkalingam Group mail:- Telstra.psm.tsd.tibco(a)accenture.com ________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the e-mail by you is prohibited. Where allowed by local law, electronic communications with Accenture and its affiliates, including e-mail and instant messaging (including content), may be scanned by our systems for the purposes of information security and assessment of internal compliance with Accenture policy. ______________________________________________________________________________________ www.accenture.com

4 4

uninstall.exe
by Michael Curran 22 Nov '16

22 Nov '16

With the distrubuted version of stunnel, there is an uninstall.exe Are there any options for this uninstaller, so I can automate removal and upgrade processes ? Like a /quiet or /Q ?? Which uninstaller application is this based off of?

1 0

Connection failure on IPv4-only box with IPv6-address in RR DNS record
by Michael Weiser 18 Nov '16

18 Nov '16

Hi, the server I connect to using stunnel has just been upgraded to IPv6. In the process an AAAA record was added to its DNS entry. The box I run stunnel on is IPv4-only, meaning, the kernel does not have any IPv6 support at all. The DNS stub resolver is still looking for AAAA records though. Consequently stunnel connections now fail about half of the time with error: 2016.11.18 20:10:57 LOG3[ui]: remote socket: Address family not supported by protocol (97) >From looking at client.c I can see that stunnel supports trying all target addresses in turn but will bail if the socket cannot be created: for(ind_try=0; ind_try<c->connect_addr.num; ind_try++) { c->fd=s_socket(c->connect_addr.addr[ind_cur].sa.sa_family, SOCK_STREAM, 0, 1, "remote socket"); if(c->fd==INVALID_SOCKET) longjmp(c->err, 1); [...] if(s_connect(c, &c->connect_addr.addr[ind_cur], [...] continue; /* next IP */ } [...] return fd; /* success! */ So I guess the problem would go away if I enabled IPv6 in the kernel of my client box: s_socket() would succeed but connect() would fail with ENETUNREACH. But couldn't stunnel just continue with the next IP if s_socket() failed with EAFNOSUPPORT? -- Thanks, Michael

1 0

Deactivate expiry date check, Have CA check with verify = 3
by Mark Shine 18 Nov '16

18 Nov '16

Hello, I would like to setup stunnel but the certificate from my other tunnel is expired. How would I tell stunnel to ignore verification of expiry date of the certificate coming from stunnel client mode to the stunnel server mode? I want to be able to verify the certificate but ignore the expiry date. Not disable cert check all the way I have a stunnel setup by someone else that has done this exact thing but I have no clue how they did it. Stunnel seems to use openssl for the verification so I guess the question should be how to bypass openssl expiry check. Please see the below link for my issue on stackexchange. http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/323997/stunnel-how-to-ignore-the-ce… [http://cdn.sstatic.net/Sites/unix/img/apple-touch-icon@2.png?v=32fb07f7ce26…]<http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/323997/stunnel-how-to-ignore-the-ce…> Stunnel: How to ignore the cert expiry date<http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/323997/stunnel-how-to-ignore-the-ce…> unix.stackexchange.com I would like to setup stunnel but the certificate from my other tunnel is expired. How would I tell stunnel to ignore verification of expiry date of the certificate coming from stunnel client mode ...

1 0

Windows builds
by Michael Curran 16 Nov '16

16 Nov '16

Hello -- Are there some solid instructions for building stunnel on windows? I am using Microsoft VS 2015 and the 64-bit compilers -- This is the basic error I am running into, but could be that stunnel wont work with 64-bit? C:\stunnel_build\stunnel-5.36.tar\stunnel-5.36\src>.\makew32.bat W32 ENVIRONMENT OK Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 14.00.24210.0 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Detected target: win64 cl /MD /W3 /O2 /nologo /I"\devel\win64\openssl\include" /DUNICODE /D_UNICODE -Fo..\obj\win64\stunnel.obj -c ..\src\stunnel.c stunnel.c c:\stunnel_build\stunnel-5.36.tar\stunnel-5.36\src\common.h(414): fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'openssl/opensslconf.h': No such file or directory NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0\VC\BIN\amd64\cl.EXE"' : return code '0x2' Stop.

2 2

Stunnel-5.x on windows 10
by Michael Curran 15 Nov '16

15 Nov '16

I have a method with VS to compile Stunnel as 64-bit for use with Windows Are there any decent instructions for compiling it as 64-bit? Michael Curran | Systems Architect Office: 614-568-2285 Mobile: 614-403-6320 ConnectSolutions | 126 Post St. Ste. 400 | San Francisco, CA 94108

1 0

Assistance needed debugging Stunnel AWS EC2 Interface
by Donald F. Coffin 15 Nov '16

15 Nov '16

I am using stunnel as a proxy to support SoapUI mock services which are used to test an SSL based application. The SoapUI and stunnel proxy are running on an AWS Ubuntu 14.04 EC2 Instance communicating to a Tomcat server running on a second AWS Ubuntu 14.04 EC2 Instance. The target application uses a wildcard SSL Certificate and works successfully when accessed using a desktop browser (Chrome or Firefox). The issue I am encountering is that the stunnel connection logs a "SSL closed on SSL_read" message as soon as the cipher suite is negotiated as shown in the following stunnel.log: 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: Clients allowed=2000 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG5[5287:140430154716992]: stunnel 4.53 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu platform 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG5[5287:140430154716992]: Compiled with OpenSSL 1.0.1e 11 Feb 2013 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG5[5287:140430154716992]: Running with OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG5[5287:140430154716992]: Update OpenSSL shared libraries or rebuild stunnel 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG5[5287:140430154716992]: Threading:PTHREAD SSL:+ENGINE+OCSP Auth:LIBWRAP Sockets:POLL+IPv6 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG5[5287:140430154716992]: Reading configuration from file /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: Compression not enabled 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: Snagged 64 random bytes from /home/ubuntu/.rnd 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to /home/ubuntu/.rnd 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: PRNG seeded successfully 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG6[5287:140430154716992]: Initializing service section [resourceServer] 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG4[5287:140430154716992]: Insecure file permissions on /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: Certificate: /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: Certificate loaded 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: Key file: /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: Private key loaded 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: Verify directory set to /etc/ssl/certs 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: Added /etc/ssl/certs revocation lookup directory 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: SSL options set: 0x00000004 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG6[5287:140430154716992]: Initializing service section [tpserver] 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG4[5287:140430154716992]: Insecure file permissions on /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: Certificate: /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: Certificate loaded 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: Key file: /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: Private key loaded 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: Verify directory set to /etc/ssl/certs 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: Added /etc/ssl/certs revocation lookup directory 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: Could not load DH parameters from /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: Using hardcoded DH parameters 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: DH initialized with 2048-bit key 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: ECDH initialized with curve prime256v1 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: SSL options set: 0x00000004 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG5[5287:140430154716992]: Configuration successful 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: Service [resourceServer] (FD=12) bound to 127.0.0.1:8080 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5287:140430154716992]: Service [tpserver] (FD=13) bound to 127.0.0.1:8444 2016.11.14 21:34:19 LOG7[5293:140430154716992]: Created pid file /var/run/stunnel4.pid 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG7[5293:140430154716992]: Service [resourceServer] accepted (FD=3) from 127.0.0.1:41256 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG7[5293:140430154827520]: Service [resourceServer] started 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG7[5293:140430154827520]: Waiting for a libwrap process 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG7[5293:140430154827520]: Acquired libwrap process #0 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG7[5293:140430154827520]: Releasing libwrap process #0 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG7[5293:140430154827520]: Released libwrap process #0 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG7[5293:140430154827520]: Service [resourceServer] permitted by libwrap from 127.0.0.1:41256 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG5[5293:140430154827520]: Service [resourceServer] accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:41256 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG6[5293:140430154827520]: connect_blocking: connecting 52.43.245.161:8443 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG7[5293:140430154827520]: connect_blocking: s_poll_wait 52.43.245.161:8443: waiting 10 seconds 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG5[5293:140430154827520]: connect_blocking: connected 52.43.245.161:8443 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG5[5293:140430154827520]: Service [resourceServer] connected remote server from 172.31.44.97:34077 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG7[5293:140430154827520]: Remote socket (FD=15) initialized 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG7[5293:140430154827520]: SNI: host name: 52.43.245.161 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG7[5293:140430154827520]: Starting certificate verification: depth=2, /C=US/O=GeoTrust Inc./CN=GeoTrust Global CA 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG6[5293:140430154827520]: CERT: Verification not enabled 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG5[5293:140430154827520]: Certificate accepted: depth=2, /C=US/O=GeoTrust Inc./CN=GeoTrust Global CA 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG7[5293:140430154827520]: Starting certificate verification: depth=1, /C=US/O=GeoTrust Inc./CN=RapidSSL SHA256 CA 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG6[5293:140430154827520]: CERT: Verification not enabled 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG5[5293:140430154827520]: Certificate accepted: depth=1, /C=US/O=GeoTrust Inc./CN=RapidSSL SHA256 CA 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG7[5293:140430154827520]: Starting certificate verification: depth=0, /CN=*.greenbuttonalliance.org 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG6[5293:140430154827520]: CERT: Verification not enabled 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG5[5293:140430154827520]: Certificate accepted: depth=0, /CN=*.greenbuttonalliance.org 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG6[5293:140430154827520]: SSL connected: new session negotiated 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG6[5293:140430154827520]: Negotiated TLSv1/SSLv3 ciphersuite: AES128-SHA (128-bit encryption) 2016.11.14 21:34:25 LOG6[5293:140430154827520]: Compression: null, expansion: null 2016.11.14 21:34:45 LOG7[5293:140430154827520]: SSL closed on SSL_read 2016.11.14 21:34:45 LOG7[5293:140430154827520]: Sent socket write shutdown 2016.11.14 21:34:56 LOG7[5293:140430154827520]: Socket closed on read 2016.11.14 21:34:56 LOG7[5293:140430154827520]: Sending close_notify alert 2016.11.14 21:34:56 LOG6[5293:140430154827520]: SSL_shutdown successfully sent close_notify alert 2016.11.14 21:34:56 LOG5[5293:140430154827520]: Connection closed: 342 byte(s) sent to SSL, 250 byte(s) sent to socket 2016.11.14 21:34:56 LOG7[5293:140430154827520]: Remote socket (FD=15) closed 2016.11.14 21:34:56 LOG7[5293:140430154827520]: Local socket (FD=3) closed 2016.11.14 21:34:56 LOG7[5293:140430154827520]: Service [resourceServer] finished (0 left) The stunnel.conf file contains the following configuration: ; ************************************************************************** ; * Service defaults may also be specified in individual service sections * ; ************************************************************************** CApath = /etc/ssl/certs ; ************************************************************************** ; * Logging * ; ************************************************************************** debug = 7 output = /home/ubuntu/Git/energyos/OpenESPI-GreenButtonCMDTest/SOAPUI/stunnel.log ; ************************************************************************** ; * Service definitions (at least one service has to be defined) * ; ************************************************************************** ; ************************************************************************** ; * Resource Server * ; ************************************************************************** [resourceServer] accept=localhost:8080 connect=52.43.245.161:8443 ciphers=AES128-SHA client = yes cert=/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem verify=0 [tpserver] accept=127.0.0.1:8444 connect=localhost:8081 cert=/etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem verify=0 client=no ciphers=AES128-SHA Are there any additional stunnel logging options or debugging techniques you can recommend to help determine why the session is being closed? Does stunnel support wildcard based certificates (i.e. *.greenbuttonalliance.org)? Best regards, Don Donald F. Coffin Technical Manager Green Button Alliance 2335 Dunwoody Crossing Suite E Dunwoody, GA 30338-8221 http://www.greenbuttonalliance.org <http://www.greenbuttonalliance.org/> (949) 636-8571 Mobile

1 0