- stunnel-users - stunnel.org

help with stunnel port forwarding
by vinod bhasi 23 Jul '08

23 Jul '08

Hi, Please help me with stunnel port forwarding . My apache is running at port 8000 .I want this to be forwarded to 80 so that normal users dont need to specify the port number . Can anyone help me with the configuration in both client and server side .Im confused as stunnel wont run with same port used by apache. Any help will be appreciated Thanks in advancve Vinod Bhasi Did you know? You can CHAT without downloading messenger. Go to http://in.webmessenger.yahoo.com/

2 1

Re: [stunnel-users] stunnel-users Digest, Vol 48, Issue 13
by Patrick Dung 21 Jul '08

21 Jul '08

Message: 3 Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:34:22 +0200 From: Micha? Trojnara <Michal.Trojnara(a)mobi-com.net> Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] Problem with Solaris 10u5 x86 and Stunnel 4.25 To: stunnel-users(a)mirt.net Message-ID: <2a3f79f5f6dd65f2ced02b2e9929368b(a)mirt.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" http://stunnel.mirt.net/pipermail/stunnel-users/2008-June/002021.html Mike On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 01:53:17 -0700 (PDT), Patrick Dung <patrick_dkt(a)yahoo.com.hk> wrote: > Hi > > I use this to compile stunnel: > The gcc and openssl is from Solaris SFW. > > # export CC=/usr/sfw/bin/gcc > # ./configure --with-threads=pthread --with-ssl=/usr/sfw > --localstatedir=/var > > After installing and starting stunnel, I found there are mutiple stunnel > processes. > There is a PID file which store one of the stunnel process. > I have tried to kill that PID, stunnel is bring down. > But there other stunnel processes running. > > Any ideas? > > Regards > Patrick > > > > > _______________________________________________ > stunnel-users mailing list > stunnel-users(a)mirt.net > http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users I see. Thanks for reply. Yesterday, I have tried to compile stunnel with Sun Studio. It got problem linking with libwrap, so I turned off libwrap support. And it compile (without knowing there is a libwrap patch) and there is only one single running stunnel process. Regards Patrick

1 0

stunnel exits silently on startup
by Luis López de Quintana 21 Jul '08

21 Jul '08

Problem: stunnel doesn't run: ldq@ldq:~$ stunnel4 /etc/stunnel.cnf ldq@ldq:~$ ps aux | grep stunnel ldq 15683 0.0 0.0 2332 1392 pts/0 S+ 11:08 0:00 man stunnel ldq 25289 0.0 0.0 1776 608 pts/1 S+ 11:59 0:00 grep stunnel stunnel.cnf: ldq@ldq:~$ cat /etc/stunnel.cnf client = yes debug = debug [nntps] accept = 127.0.0.1:1109 connect = news.giganews.com:443 Version: stunnel 4.140-5ubuntu1 libc6 ldq@ldq:~$ uname -a Linux ldq 2.6.18.5 SMP Thu May 8 01:31:23 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- LdQ

2 2

Problem with Solaris 10u5 x86 and Stunnel 4.25
by Patrick Dung 19 Jul '08

19 Jul '08

Hi I use this to compile stunnel: The gcc and openssl is from Solaris SFW. # export CC=/usr/sfw/bin/gcc # ./configure --with-threads=pthread --with-ssl=/usr/sfw --localstatedir=/var After installing and starting stunnel, I found there are mutiple stunnel processes. There is a PID file which store one of the stunnel process. I have tried to kill that PID, stunnel is bring down. But there other stunnel processes running. Any ideas? Regards Patrick

1 0

Config Sanity Check
by Caplan, Michael 19 Jul '08

19 Jul '08

Hi There, I am working through an issue with a script that builds a socket connection to stunnel. Stunnel is being used to relay to an Apache web server. I'm building a localhost TCP connection on port 54322, and writing my HTTP data. When reading data back from the socket connection in my script I'm sometimes getting nothing, and other times getting the proper result. I can confirm that the web server is always receiving the request and returning a proper response. Wireshark shows SSL data being transmitted and received, so stunnel is doing its thing. However, the response does not seem to be relayed to my script on the other side of stunnel *sometimes*. My hunch is that I am doing something wrong with my script, but I am hoping that an stunnel guru can rule out any oddities with my stunnel setup. My config is below as well as the output of my log file. Any thoughts? Thanks! Mike cert = connector.pem debug = 7 output = c:\ssl.log ; Some performance tunings socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 [registerserver] client = yes accept =54321 connect =www.int.ddx.com:443 [connector2server] client = yes accept =54322 connect =asd.int.ddx.com:443 [server2connector] accept = 54323 connect = 9000 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Snagged 64 random bytes from C:/.rnd 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to C:/.rnd 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: RAND_status claims sufficient entropy for the PRNG 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: PRNG seeded successfully 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Certificate: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Certificate loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Key file: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Private key loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: SSL context initialized for service registerserver 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Certificate: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Certificate loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Key file: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Private key loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: SSL context initialized for service connector2server 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Certificate: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Certificate loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Key file: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Private key loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: SSL context initialized for service server2connector 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Certificate: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Certificate loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Key file: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: Private key loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG7[13648:13748]: SSL context initialized for service test 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG5[13648:13748]: stunnel 4.25 on x86-pc-mingw32-gnu with OpenSSL 0.9.8h 28 May 2008 2008.07.18 21:41:41 LOG5[13648:13748]: Threading:WIN32 SSL:ENGINE Sockets:SELECT,IPv6 2008.07.18 21:41:46 LOG7[13476:13096]: Snagged 64 random bytes from C:/.rnd 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to C:/.rnd 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: RAND_status claims sufficient entropy for the PRNG 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: PRNG seeded successfully 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Certificate: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Certificate loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Key file: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Private key loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: SSL context initialized for service registerserver 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Certificate: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Certificate loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Key file: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Private key loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: SSL context initialized for service connector2server 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Certificate: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Certificate loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Key file: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Private key loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: SSL context initialized for service server2connector 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Certificate: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Certificate loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Key file: connector.pem 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: Private key loaded 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG7[13476:13096]: SSL context initialized for service test 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG5[13476:13096]: stunnel 4.25 on x86-pc-mingw32-gnu with OpenSSL 0.9.8h 28 May 2008 2008.07.18 21:41:47 LOG5[13476:13096]: Threading:WIN32 SSL:ENGINE Sockets:SELECT,IPv6 Please consider the environment before printing this email. E-mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code. By reading the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full responsibility for taking protective action against such code. Henry Schein is not liable for any loss or damage arising from this message. The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.

1 0

Difference between verify level 2 and 3
by Sandeep Kumar 16 Jul '08

16 Jul '08

Hi, I searched a lot on google, in the archives, and in the FAQ page, but could not find the differences between verify levels 2 and 3, other than the one line explanation given on the FAQ/man page. Specifically, I want to ask: 1. Is verify level 3 same as 2, but asks for client certificates as well? (Seems unlikely but still..) 2. Since verify level 2 also demands CApath/CAfile to be present, then it also is ultimately verifying against locally installed certs, which is supposed to be level 3's behaviour? Thanks & regards, Sandeep Kumar http://web.iiit.ac.in/~sandeep_kr

2 2

stunnel-portforwarding
by vinod bhasi 16 Jul '08

16 Jul '08

Hi All, I am a newbie as far as stunnel is concerned. I need help urgently on how to do port forwarding with Stunnel. Any help is appreciated. Thanks and Regards, Vinod Bhasi Save all your chat conversations. Find them online at http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/webmessengerpromo.php

1 0

SSL with SMTP problem - sTunnel 4.25 Windows
by dscycler 14 Jul '08

14 Jul '08

I am using sTunnel 4.25 for Windows to send and receive e-mail from a GoldMine client. sTunnel has worked well over the years but am having an issue with a particular mail host, Live Office. They have implemented SMTP SSL on port 25. The debug log is as follows: 2008.07.14 13:45:11 LOG7[2136:5356]: smtp accepted FD=224 from 127.0.0.1:1907 2008.07.14 13:45:11 LOG7[2136:5356]: Creating a new thread 2008.07.14 13:45:11 LOG7[2136:5356]: New thread created 2008.07.14 13:45:11 LOG7[2136:4944]: smtp started 2008.07.14 13:45:11 LOG7[2136:4944]: FD 224 in non-blocking mode 2008.07.14 13:45:11 LOG5[2136:4944]: smtp accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:1907 2008.07.14 13:45:11 LOG7[2136:4944]: FD 232 in non-blocking mode 2008.07.14 13:45:11 LOG7[2136:4944]: smtp connecting 64.70.94.196:25 2008.07.14 13:45:11 LOG7[2136:4944]: connect_wait: waiting 10 seconds 2008.07.14 13:45:11 LOG7[2136:4944]: connect_wait: connected 2008.07.14 13:45:11 LOG5[2136:4944]: smtp connected remote server from 127.0.0.1:1908 2008.07.14 13:45:11 LOG7[2136:4944]: Remote FD=232 initialized 2008.07.14 13:45:11 LOG7[2136:4944]: SSL state (connect): before/connect initialization 2008.07.14 13:45:11 LOG7[2136:4944]: SSL state (connect): SSLv3 write client hello A 2008.07.14 13:45:11 LOG7[2136:4944]: SSL alert (write): fatal: handshake failure 2008.07.14 13:45:11 LOG3[2136:4944]: SSL_connect: 1408F10B: error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version number 2008.07.14 13:45:11 LOG5[2136:4944]: Connection reset: 0 bytes sent to SSL, 0 bytes sent to socket 2008.07.14 13:45:11 LOG7[2136:4944]: smtp finished (0 left) I am looking for help to troubleshoot the connection problem. Is this an sTunnel issue or a mail server issue? Are there conf file settings to address the issue? Thanks, DavidS

1 0

Re: [stunnel-users] stunnel-users Digest, Vol 48, Issue 8
by Pietro Di Primo 10 Jul '08

10 Jul '08

Thank you for reply. I tryied it but it doesn't work because my client run some separated subprocesses and are them that contact the server so, if an extern process try to connect to 127.0.0.1:<the_found_port> while one of that subprocess has finished and the next is not yet started, it will be able to do it and also my subprocess will be pending (i tryed it). Hope i was able to explain the situation. Any suggestion? Thanks in advace > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 13:26:03 +0200 (CEST) > From: "Pietro Di Primo" <pietro.diprimo(a)ct.infn.it> > Subject: [stunnel-users] client-server tunnelling > To: stunnel-users(a)mirt.net > Message-ID: > <2553.193.206.208.201.1215602763.squirrel(a)imapfis.ct.infn.it> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 > > Hi, I have a client server application, and want to tunnel it in this way: > a script select a free port in a random way, write the stunnel.conf file. > with "accept=<the_found_port>" and "connect=<my_server>" and run my client > application passing to 127.0.0.1:<the_found_port> as server address. > The problem is that i need to be sure that no other client or user can > access <the_found_port> while the application is running. > I guess that it should be possible to do it, but i wasn't able to. > > Can anybody help me? > > Thanks > > > -- > --- > > Ing. Pietro Di Primo > INFN - Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare > Grid Computing Research Area > Via S. Sofia 78 95123 CATANIA (Italy) > Voice : +39 095 378-5446/5517 > Fax. : +39 095 378 5518 > Mobile : +39 320 8591527 > E-mail : pietro.diprimo(a)ct.infn.it > Skype : pietrodiprimo > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 14:08:23 +0200 > From: Micha? Trojnara <Michal.Trojnara(a)mobi-com.net> > Subject: Re: [stunnel-users] client-server tunnelling > To: stunnel-users(a)mirt.net > Message-ID: <6ba9f1b703149916bb1a61fb68a1e377(a)mirt.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > > Pietro Di Primo wrote: >> Hi, I have a client server application, and want to tunnel it in this > way: >> a script select a free port in a random way, write the stunnel.conf >> file. >> with "accept=<the_found_port>" and "connect=<my_server>" and run my > client >> application passing to 127.0.0.1:<the_found_port> as server address. >> The problem is that i need to be sure that no other client or user can >> access <the_found_port> while the application is running. >> I guess that it should be possible to do it, but i wasn't able to. > > Simply bind the specific network interface with: > accept=127.0.0.1:<the_found_port> > > Best regards, > Mike > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > stunnel-users mailing list > stunnel-users(a)mirt.net > http://stunnel.mirt.net/mailman/listinfo/stunnel-users > > > End of stunnel-users Digest, Vol 48, Issue 8 > ******************************************** > -- --- Ing. Pietro Di Primo INFN - Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Grid Computing Research Area Via S. Sofia 78 95123 CATANIA (Italy) Voice : +39 095 378-5446/5517 Fax. : +39 095 378 5518 Mobile : +39 320 8591527 E-mail : pietro.diprimo(a)ct.infn.it Skype : pietrodiprimo

1 0

client-server tunnelling
by Pietro Di Primo 09 Jul '08

09 Jul '08

Hi, I have a client server application, and want to tunnel it in this way: a script select a free port in a random way, write the stunnel.conf file. with "accept=<the_found_port>" and "connect=<my_server>" and run my client application passing to 127.0.0.1:<the_found_port> as server address. The problem is that i need to be sure that no other client or user can access <the_found_port> while the application is running. I guess that it should be possible to do it, but i wasn't able to. Can anybody help me? Thanks -- --- Ing. Pietro Di Primo INFN - Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Grid Computing Research Area Via S. Sofia 78 95123 CATANIA (Italy) Voice : +39 095 378-5446/5517 Fax. : +39 095 378 5518 Mobile : +39 320 8591527 E-mail : pietro.diprimo(a)ct.infn.it Skype : pietrodiprimo

1 0