stunnel-users April 2015

stunnel-users@stunnel.org

14 participants
16 discussions

Stunnel 4 failing to connect to gmail
by Asif Iqbal 11 Dec '20

11 Dec '20

I am faling to connect to gmail. Not sure what that bind error means. iqbala@ghar:~$ sudo stunnel4 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Snagged 64 random bytes from /home/iqbala/.rnd 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to /home/iqbala/.rnd 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: RAND_status claims sufficient entropy for the PRNG 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: PRNG seeded successfully 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Certificate: /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Certificate loaded 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Key file: /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: Private key loaded 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: SSL context initialized for service ssmtp 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG5[3839:3083650736]: stunnel 4.22 on i486-pc-linux-gnu with OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG5[3839:3083650736]: Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE Sockets:POLL,IPv6 Auth:LIBWRAP 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG6[3839:3083650736]: file ulimit = 1024 (can be changed with 'ulimit -n') 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG6[3839:3083650736]: poll() used - no FD_SETSIZE limit for file descriptors 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG5[3839:3083650736]: 500 clients allowed 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: FD 10 in non-blocking mode 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: FD 11 in non-blocking mode 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: FD 12 in non-blocking mode 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG7[3839:3083650736]: SO_REUSEADDR option set on accept socket 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG3[3839:3083650736]: Error binding ssmtp to 74.125.93.111:587 2008.12.15 13:53:17 LOG3[3839:3083650736]: bind: Cannot assign requested address (99) Here is how my conf file looks like iqbala@ghar:~$ cat /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf | egrep -v "^;|^$" cert = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem foreground = yes sslVersion = SSLv3 chroot = /var/lib/stunnel4/ setuid = stunnel4 setgid = stunnel4 pid = /stunnel4.pid socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 debug = 7 output = /var/log/stunnel4/stunnel.log client = yes [ssmtp] accept = smtp.gmail.com:587 connect = 25 Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu

5 9

stunnel and hosts.allow
by Yousef Alhashemi 05 Jul '16

05 Jul '16

Hi, This may be a little bit off-topic, but does anyone here use stunnel with pan? My connections to stunnel (in pan) are always refused by libwrap. I was looking for the right rule to add to /etc/hosts.allow but nothing seems to work aside from "ALL : ALL" (which is obviously not good) and "nntps: KNOWN". Is the latter reasonable? The hosts_access(5) manpage is confusing to say the least. It mentions that daemon (the first token on any line) is the name of the daemon running the process, which would be "stunnel" in my case, but using "stunnel : LOCAL" or even "stunnel : ALL" doesn't work. The rule that seems to work, as mentioned, is "nntps : KNOWN" ("nntps" being the group name in stunnel.conf). What's even more confusing to me is that "nntps : LOCAL" does not work either. Nor does "nntps : localhost 127.0.0.1", "nntps : localhost", "nntps : 127.0.0.1", or "nntps : 192.168.1.". Pan is running on the same machine as stunnel so all connections must be coming from localhost. Why do these rules not trigger? Either way, I'd like to know the "least permissive" hosts.allow rule that would allow me to connect to my news provider from pan, and/or whether "nntps : KNOWN" is a safe option. Thanks, Yousef

3 6

Segfault in stunnel
by Miroslaw Pietrzyk 03 May '15

03 May '15

Hi, I have a problem with one of the stunnel installation (debian7). After some time of operation automatically turns itself off with the message: (...) Apr 24 21:03:45 routerpri kernel: [177332.400502] stunnel[34426]: segfault at 0 ip 00007f1f99ca9e20 sp 00007f1f99c16c68 error 4 in stunnel[7f1f99c94000+24000] (...) Apr 24 21:21:36 routerpri kernel: [178402.360532] stunnel[34795]: segfault at 0 ip 00007f84d6b8be20 sp 00007f84d6b49c68 error 4 in stunnel[7f84d6b76000+24000] (...) Apr 24 21:23:31 routerpri kernel: [178517.215345] stunnel[34908]: segfault at 0 ip 00007f150c5b3e20 sp 00007f150c58cc68 error 4 in stunnel[7f150c59e000+24000] (...) stunnel 5.15 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu platform Compiled/running with OpenSSL 1.0.1e 11 Feb 2013 stunnel.conf: pid = /var/run/stunnel.pid socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 debug = 7 output = /var/log/stunnel.log syslog = yes client = no fips = no verify = 0 CAfile = /etc/stunnel/SubCA2.crt CRLfile = /etc/stunnel/SubCA2_CRL.pem [service_1] accept = 192.168.1.10:1000 connect = 192.168.1.10:1234 cert = /etc/stunnel/cert1.crt key = /etc/stunnel/cert1_key.pem ciphers = HIGH:!SSLv2:!ADH:!Exp:!aNULL:!eNULL:!NULL sslVersion = TLSv1.2 When I use the lower level of encryption for example SSLv3, problem occurs after a longer period of normal operation. I will only add that the problem has also appeared on the previous version 4.54, which I was updating to the newest. Do you have any idea what could be causing the problem. Regards Mirek

2 2

stunnel 5.17 release
by Michal Trojnara 29 Apr '15

29 Apr '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Users, I have released version 5.17 of stunnel. The ChangeLog entry: Version 5.17, 2015.04.29, urgency: HIGH: * Bugfixes - Fixed a NULL pointer dereference causing the service to crash. This bug was introduced in stunnel 5.15. Home page: https://www.stunnel.org/ Download: https://www.stunnel.org/downloads.html SHA-256 hashes: c3e79e582621a0827125e35e1c00450190104fc02dc3c5274cb02b05859fd472 stunnel-5.17.tar.gz 07a508de3807663f71e4793fd5edb4c57b6c82b4c9008753f8f6c85a17acbeea stunnel-5.17-installer.exe 49d2cc11aefe2062576a0bbfafa3beb5ae541683d90972c6ed457b19a455c346 stunnel-5.17-android.zip Best regards, Mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVQSIlAAoJEC78f/DUFuAU5XEP/R2d2gXCeKk7d/466dOYF//A YlXC6oDbs7OB8qEHH3u5u5hl8WIZJOmbPb79APSJKd7ESREoRk97UBJZYoH+QuEB CHOs0czty5IE2QyMibHJZ4Zed23q/QHrTRL9GpZd8EPkmiRG/dq7M+vC0gJJuF+N 4CPCNj464ATtjFB3mPju+wQinnWj8s57kNAazifAQNvM/jhdJOMH+BOvXIGEwUlt iZ8MBwO707j81UWkSFANxn1GMTOoJY2pTTAmJr/eKun9sLbuN7v4ec8Mtwdcj16P 5CeXD1g7gOK5q2FizIUWfBD38nPRVBXMqfSAkjtezwqZJb1K4bfa505E4SY3bKzL CJstbH206rQriqhpV4hrsuGVmb6M7lt57zAJZ746NQtlRm1gLdf/56JclsHqmkqo Z6zAuXRAiarkn88OsERp8r84Y4l8q/D8dkZwYPObSCT+SAMimPzLxhu9sjIKsb1I lSFNS2P9sEw/MhM9yQGfyC0GKzQWrQIONFHP2iCS8+ySEc+6/1b9tB9oiOcsAL1c edWV3m5SQzG7TbsbtApRy6Pvb30O7/5zAJOiBN6Yf5OQ8OyjL4M9+ZKd75qQxsQj IEZNJW/caVz9QwNWc2BQtaUVy7RC0CaTmbebsoQWlKQmzosXMU2QgC/WJ3jQdslz Vc3C3rKKvwGPw1DZLX95 =tC15 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

startup issues
by Coviello, Paul 24 Apr '15

24 Apr '15

Hi, Well I got it started on VMS and wanted to put it in debug mode, so I shut it down made my changes to the conf file and now well I can't start it with the command procedure. I even tried the old conf and same thing... $ @STUNNEL_STARTUP_SERVER Is the private key (in the PEM file) encrypted? [Y/N]: Y Enter the password to decrypt the key (please use paired double quotes with it): ""XXXXXXXXX"" Starting up a Stunnel %RUN-S-PROC_ID, identification of created process is 209FCA70 Stunnel server failed to start up-- check the configuration, etc. Nothing is logged... But if I do the following $ stunnel STUNNEL_SERVER.CONF And the output to the screen... 2015.04.24 10:35:24 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: Snagged 64 random bytes from sys$common:[sysmgr].rnd 2015.04.24 10:35:24 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to sys$common:[sysmgr].rnd 2015.04.24 10:35:24 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: RAND_status claims sufficient entropy for the PRNG 2015.04.24 10:35:24 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: PRNG seeded successfully 2015.04.24 10:35:24 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: Certificate: stunnel.pem 2015.04.24 10:35:24 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: Certificate loaded 2015.04.24 10:35:24 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: Key file: stunnel.pem Enter PEM pass phrase: 2015.04.24 10:35:31 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: Private key loaded 2015.04.24 10:35:31 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: SSL context initialized for service telnet This is where it sits unless I do a ctrl-c to cancel and get back to the system prompt. And when I do my telnet session I cannot connect. Well I connect but no prompts for me to login But now I have log output! :) 2015.04.24 10:08:31 LOG5[547326662:2071228096]: stunnel undefined on vax-openvms with OpenSSL 0.9.8h 28 May 2008 2015.04.24 10:08:31 LOG5[547326662:2071228096]: Threading:PTHREAD Sockets:POLL,IPv4 2015.04.24 10:08:31 LOG6[547326662:2071228096]: file ulimit = 512 (can be changed with 'ulimit -n') 2015.04.24 10:08:31 LOG6[547326662:2071228096]: poll() used - no FD_SETSIZE limit for file descriptors 2015.04.24 10:08:31 LOG5[547326662:2071228096]: 250 clients allowed 2015.04.24 10:08:31 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: FD 5 in non-blocking mode 2015.04.24 10:08:31 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: FD 4 in non-blocking mode 2015.04.24 10:08:31 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: FD 6 in non-blocking mode 2015.04.24 10:08:31 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: SO_REUSEADDR option set on accept socket 2015.04.24 10:08:31 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: telnet bound to 0.0.0.0: 2015.04.24 10:15:00 LOG3[547326662:2071228096]: Received signal 2; terminating 2015.04.24 10:18:18 LOG5[547326662:2071228096]: stunnel undefined on vax-openvms with OpenSSL 0.9.8h 28 May 2008 2015.04.24 10:18:18 LOG5[547326662:2071228096]: Threading:PTHREAD Sockets:POLL,IPv4 2015.04.24 10:18:18 LOG6[547326662:2071228096]: file ulimit = 512 (can be changed with 'ulimit -n') 2015.04.24 10:18:18 LOG6[547326662:2071228096]: poll() used - no FD_SETSIZE limit for file descriptors 2015.04.24 10:18:18 LOG5[547326662:2071228096]: 250 clients allowed 2015.04.24 10:18:18 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: FD 5 in non-blocking mode 2015.04.24 10:18:18 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: FD 4 in non-blocking mode 2015.04.24 10:18:18 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: FD 6 in non-blocking mode 2015.04.24 10:18:18 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: SO_REUSEADDR option set on accept socket 2015.04.24 10:18:19 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: telnet bound to 0.0.0.0: 2015.04.24 10:21:08 LOG6[547326662:2071228096]: going to accept mode 2015.04.24 10:21:08 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: telnet accepted FD=7 from 192.168.20.140:59281 2015.04.24 10:21:08 LOG6[547326662:2071228096]: accepted connection 2015.04.24 10:21:08 LOG7[547326662:8966656]: telnet started 2015.04.24 10:21:08 LOG7[547326662:8966656]: FD 7 in non-blocking mode 2015.04.24 10:21:08 LOG7[547326662:8966656]: TCP_NODELAY option set on local socket 2015.04.24 10:21:08 LOG5[547326662:8966656]: telnet accepted connection from 0.0.0.0: 2015.04.24 10:21:08 LOG7[547326662:8966656]: SSL state (accept): before/accept initialization 2015.04.24 10:21:30 LOG3[547326662:8966656]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected 2015.04.24 10:21:30 LOG5[547326662:8966656]: Connection reset: 0 bytes sent to SSL, 0 bytes sent to socket 2015.04.24 10:21:30 LOG7[547326662:8966656]: telnet finished (0 left) 2015.04.24 10:21:31 LOG6[547326662:2071228096]: going to accept mode 2015.04.24 10:21:31 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: telnet accepted FD=7 from 192.168.20.140:59283 2015.04.24 10:21:31 LOG6[547326662:2071228096]: accepted connection 2015.04.24 10:21:31 LOG7[547326662:8966656]: telnet started 2015.04.24 10:21:31 LOG7[547326662:8966656]: FD 7 in non-blocking mode 2015.04.24 10:21:31 LOG7[547326662:8966656]: TCP_NODELAY option set on local socket 2015.04.24 10:21:31 LOG5[547326662:8966656]: telnet accepted connection from 0.0.0.0: 2015.04.24 10:21:31 LOG7[547326662:8966656]: SSL state (accept): before/accept initialization 2015.04.24 10:21:32 LOG3[547326662:8966656]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected 2015.04.24 10:21:32 LOG5[547326662:8966656]: Connection reset: 0 bytes sent to SSL, 0 bytes sent to socket 2015.04.24 10:21:32 LOG7[547326662:8966656]: telnet finished (0 left) 2015.04.24 10:21:33 LOG6[547326662:2071228096]: going to accept mode 2015.04.24 10:21:33 LOG7[547326662:2071228096]: telnet accepted FD=7 from 192.168.20.140:59284 2015.04.24 10:21:33 LOG6[547326662:2071228096]: accepted connection 2015.04.24 10:21:33 LOG7[547326662:8966656]: telnet started 2015.04.24 10:21:33 LOG7[547326662:8966656]: FD 7 in non-blocking mode 2015.04.24 10:21:33 LOG7[547326662:8966656]: TCP_NODELAY option set on local socket 2015.04.24 10:21:33 LOG5[547326662:8966656]: telnet accepted connection from 0.0.0.0: 2015.04.24 10:21:33 LOG7[547326662:8966656]: SSL state (accept): before/accept initialization 2015.04.24 10:21:34 LOG3[547326662:8966656]: SSL_accept: Peer suddenly disconnected 2015.04.24 10:21:34 LOG5[547326662:8966656]: Connection reset: 0 bytes sent to SSL, 0 bytes sent to socket 2015.04.24 10:21:34 LOG7[547326662:8966656]: telnet finished (0 left) Paul J Coviello Senior System Administrator CCS Corporate Headquarters Two Wells Avenue, Newton, MA 02459 617.965.2000, Ext. 4004 [cid:image001.png@01D07E7A.602FCE40] [cid:image002.gif@01D07E7A.602FCE40] CCS Commercial, LLC | CCS Resources, Inc. | ClaimAssist, LLC | Credit Control Services, Inc. Customer Contact Solutions, LLC | Enterprise Associates, LLC

2 4

Fwd: Comments/questions to Debian patches
by Michal Trojnara 24 Apr '15

24 Apr '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Users, Peter Pentchev, the Debian package maintainer for the "stunnel4" package, does not reply to my emails. I hope he is still alive and well, just too busy to maintain the package. I decided to share with you my comments to the patches that are applied to the Debian package. Hopefully, someone will find them useful. Mike - -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Comments/questions to Debian patches Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 21:13:25 +0100 From: Michal Trojnara <Michal.Trojnara(a)mirt.net> To: Peter Pentchev <roam(a)ringlet.net> Hi Peter, Just a few comments/questions to improve the quality of Debian package. I'll be glad to discuss if you disagree with my opinions. 01-fix-paths.patch The patch description is quite outdated. Translation from sbin to bin was performed upstream in stunnel 4.21 released 27 Oct 2007. 8-) I guess: /usr/bin/stunnel -fd 10 \ should be: /usr/bin/stunnel4 -fd 10 \ Probably this should be added to the next patch: 02-rename-binary.patch 05-logrotate-warning-in-sample-conf.patch Good idea. I'll add it to stunnel 5.07. 08-client-example.patch I've already added this example in stunnel 5.02. Your patch adds it once again. Just remove it. 10-no-zlib-compression.patch I'm completely confused by this patch. According to my tests it only makes stunnel reporting different errors when a user tries to enable compression on Debian. Why would anyone need this patch? 11-no-rle-compression.patch IMHO OpenSSL bugs should be fixed in OpenSSL, and not in stunnel. YMMV 12-restore-pidfile-default.patch I strongly disagree with this approach, as it breaks configuration file compatibility with the upstream. Debian should instead rewrite stunnel.conf when upgrading from stunnel 4.xx. 14-lsb-init-functions.patch 8-) 15-upstream-systemd-libs.patch This (and more) will be included in stunnel 5.07. 16-upstream-sslv23-method.patch This will be included in stunnel 5.07. Mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVNsCAAAoJEC78f/DUFuAUpfUP/j13koMgtnVLfsACIqUEaZw3 1uADOP/Dugqbn/QcwSqWAlcTrf7So98AQrB88xAhN8C3fwP375GmcNmPgJx4RRme fU/Wo0aFaCq0JOReiQkNiyj3pqf+J2NxZlZM5ZpzzpA80x8AlyLqBwPfBAtxgYNJ rb5AyIoGPkzfXM8OSz8YJXZtgXT4lrSCE5djlWHHBqy9ioUZCEuyVXeT5Y90sXOg wOA/EX3fTKEJZckoiNoTPAh9pLZ9M29lLM7wLEu5BFWwh/TtHk0ZFADo3Kzi/+4G Q6h9236DmH1NHA/FzMfFbKEYz/0yeOUMfet8LsRNNRRrFJEp+miMemSYajGMA3IT UVW4UNOa+CppVgkRpVMGfl/Lw53GP63xbLIRuZs17py03hNBHz2pyZneWWKTJEun xJQC4QJ3Z3YYXd71jpHIKjcDBXmIzcG8Z9QylaTywk8MBBBpjuRTXkIAlWWj2Iyk LVRsAgtooUKlQzUoAoseRygDv+Wbp/qVNL1Zogy7PmfORmqZOz08jRpDlXFgjPjR evGztgApTR+FSMO9f052z/Sql0chb5mhtdAtdBKpRE3CgtIrCHfcalSOyeCleHJK NMEbqfed9Oq2WA0/W89ilGtJWRH4v0GnYCfbYhbSoXp9DytdHPbhRUsiJL8LO34b 1cuMSsQ9LjF+3WyRie4m =SrZs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 2

Redis with stunnel, need to reset a client connection if the remote server drops
by Cocytus 20 Apr '15

20 Apr '15

Hello all, I've spent some time digging through the archives, but have yet to turn up a solution to the issue I'm having. We're using Redis instances on 'cloud' resources, and have successfully gotten stunnel setup as a server on these nodes. Additionally an internal process runs and connects to a local stunnel client that then connects to the remote cloud instance. This is working well enough at the moment, however there is one issue I'm bumping into. If the remote EC2 node goes dark for a bit (ie: reboot), the local stunnel client will reconnect, however the internal process which is establishing its connection to the local stunnel client does not get disconnected and therefore doesn't know that redis became unavailable and needs to re-subscribe to the redis stream. I need to invalidate the established session when the remote reconnects. Can this be accomplished with either a TIMEOUT value or session statement? Below is a sample of the configuration: ########### [some-ec2-node.com] client = yes verify = 2 CApath = /etc/ssl/certs sslVersion = TLSv1 accept = 127.0.0.1:10008 connect = some-ec2-node.com:6379 ########### $ stunnel4 -version stunnel 4.53 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu platform Compiled with OpenSSL 1.0.1e 11 Feb 2013 Running with OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014 Update OpenSSL shared libraries or rebuild stunnel Threading:PTHREAD SSL:+ENGINE+OCSP Auth:LIBWRAP Sockets:POLL+IPv6 Global options: debug = daemon.notice pid = /var/run/stunnel4.pid RNDbytes = 64 RNDfile = /dev/urandom RNDoverwrite = yes Service-level options: ciphers = ALL:!SSLv2:!aNULL:!EXP:!LOW:-MEDIUM:RC4:+HIGH curve = prime256v1 session = 300 seconds sslVersion = TLSv1 for client, all for server stack = 65536 bytes TIMEOUTbusy = 300 seconds TIMEOUTclose = 60 seconds TIMEOUTconnect = 10 seconds TIMEOUTidle = 43200 seconds verify = none -- Josh

2 1

stunnel 5.16 release
by Michal Trojnara 19 Apr '15

19 Apr '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Users, I have released version 5.16 of stunnel. This release only fixes a compilation issue with old versions of gcc. The Win32/Android binaries are basically the same as for version 5.15. The ChangeLog entry: Version 5.16, 2015.04.19, urgency: MEDIUM: * Bugfixes - Fixed compilation with old versions of gcc. Home page: https://www.stunnel.org/ Download: https://www.stunnel.org/downloads.html SHA-256 hashes: b6b7e93fb2626eaabae1c8474e1dfa23962cfde8fa35c8602289fcaa4f53608d stunnel-5.16.tar.gz a701e6421c3020cc832ecb0e3a897c427a3838e0e180999ed8d905a9283fbb97 stunnel-5.16-installer.exe 2e559cc300b678fb2d05c2d2d3dc13d16cb44915f0165bea6290f741fccaa54c stunnel-5.16-android.zip Best regards, Mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVM7KGAAoJEC78f/DUFuAUWwoQAJUnjUpyNLhjUQxRwScKjgNx AJ5OPZHXwVjX+xvtSSOjlkK/pk5l4SaEbNtq6hwMGliDpowXXDGXeYwNbmACXGuM sZWzdTUC69WKLQcwfTmn5BmsPQtczaCDQdyBVGSII4qg0mFIU4e1GYT0t8od7OcU n17nnRCLEaS2xlDwR5ImMuRjD+BdpEgZdiRXqtJkyjX8+aSRsEtSVjDBJ5wtsYNN 9pyMp8xU+7+sxX5GiLQ8+IcqcUq+W53nMJQZmN5vQ8O2ShxuBeZYdvembPhybvlE NrnfmjvDtl6A0iFs8ZhRRPTJZTKqj88UGhn49g3eQBH+CbNK08GalWCwR/uX8yFb +Z801mNIxJQrPnSlSaWLDPGNQ9GBqxliui1IR+Biv1KpmcPWBDAOI+Y7Hqyy1/5r MUDT9GB4HLZTC6aWtR0IyG30w3CvUmNr+sENu91ewvl0I1Z04yWyK+wQ3L3CbWyk aVBaNmt09pR8zgU9nvw8aAE2MLJ5oCgoangGpO6rEL0frh7TZhzD9sOMMVefKZDY rPPApyOiphH+3nnh9EiM357S9saXJMFe8/gNh6+lNXmYJ0ngMcPybz9mNV+RbbZU P1itA5RYBAwDTEJcpvATEj8ni9YPdDdFVmMrvC7ay5KZo0HWHxH23ryShBN9XYjC diuX4vtV2LMVYV5dlmAj =Eer2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Rewriting HTTP host header
by Veit Guna 19 Apr '15

19 Apr '15

Hi. After disabling SSLv3 I've got the same problem as: https://www.stunnel.org/pipermail/stunnel-users/2014-October/004814.html Sadly, he never got an answer. So I ask again, is it possible that stunnel could set the HTTP Host header to match the "connect = " setting? This way, Apache would accept that request instead of returning BAD REQUEST with AH02032. Thanks Veit

2 1

openvms and stunnel
by Coviello, Paul 17 Apr '15

17 Apr '15

Hello I'm trying to setup stunnel 4.20 yes it is an old version but the only one on HP's website for VMS. I need a little help in the conf files. Since I will be using telnet, do I need to put in each machines ip address that will be connecting? So in the example below do I create a listing of connects? [telnet] accept = 999 connect = 192.168.0.1:993 Thanks Paul Paul J Coviello Senior System Administrator CCS Corporate Headquarters Two Wells Avenue, Newton, MA 02459 617.965.2000, Ext. 4004 [cid:image001.png@01D071ED.C6122490] [cid:image002.gif@01D071ED.C6122490] CCS Commercial, LLC | CCS Resources, Inc. | ClaimAssist, LLC | Credit Control Services, Inc. Customer Contact Solutions, LLC | Enterprise Associates, LLC

4 21

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

stunnel-users April 2015